Overcoming the limitations to co-production in shrinking cities: insights from Latvia, France, and the Netherlands

References

• Akmentiņa, L. 2020. “Participatory Planning in Post-Socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga.” Architecture and Urban Planning 16: 17–25. doi:10.2478/aup-2020-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2012. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by Using a Coproduction Perspective.” Planning Theory 12: 46–63. doi:10.1177/1473095212452722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audirac, I., F. Sylvie, and C. Martinez-Fernandez. 2010. “Shrinking Cities in a Time of Crisis.” Berkeley Planning Journal 23: 51–57. doi:10.5070/bp323111430.
   Google Scholar
• Bernt, M. 2009. “Partnerships for Demolition: The Governance of Urban Renewal in East Germany’s Shrinking Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33: 754–769. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00856.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernt, M. 2016. “The Limits of Shrinkage: Conceptual Pitfalls and Alternatives in the Discussion of Urban Population Loss.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40: 441–450. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosák, V., O. Slach, A. Nováček, and L. Krtička. 2020. “Temporary Use and Brownfield Regeneration in Post-Socialist Context: From Bottom-Up Governance to Artists Exploitation.” European Planning Studies 28: 604–626. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226067414.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review, 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., T. Steen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. Co-Production and Co-Creation. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138700116.
   Google Scholar
• Camarda, D., F. Rotondo, and F. Selicato. 2015. “Strategies for Dealing with Urban Shrinkage: Issues and Scenarios in Taranto.” European Planning Studies 23: 126–146. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.820099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS Statline. 2022. Accessed 13 June 2022. http://statline.cbs.nl
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat Social Participation and Integration Statistics in the European Union (EU). 2021. Accessed 20 February 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Social_participation_and_integration_statistics#Formal_and_informal_voluntary_activities
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801476907.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12: 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fol, S. 2012. “Urban Shrinkage and Socio-Spatial Disparities: Are the Remedies Worse Than the Disease?” Built Environment 38: 259–275. doi:10.2148/benv.38.2.259.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. Wright. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso Press. ISBN 9781859844663.
   Google Scholar
• Galuszka, J. 2019. “What Makes Urban Governance Co-Productive? Contradictions in the Current Debate on Co-Production.” Planning Theory 18: 143–160. doi:10.1177/1473095218780535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers, G. 2013. “Coping with Shrinkage in Europe’s Cities and Towns.” Urban Design International 18: 78–89. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers, G. 2014. “Policy Responses to Urban Shrinkage: From Growth Thinking to Civic Engagement.” European Planning Studies 22: 1507–1523. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.793655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Borgne, S. 2023. “Coping with Urban Shrinkage: The Role of Informal Social Capital in French Medium-Sized Shrinking Cities.” European Planning Studies. forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leetmaa, K., A. Kriszan, M. Nuga, and J. Burdack. 2015. “Strategies to Cope with Shrinkage in the Lower End of the Urban Hierarchy in Estonia and Central Germany.” European Planning Studies 23: 147–165. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.820100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C. 2017. “Unequal Citizenship in Unequal Cities: Participatory Urban Governance in Contemporary South Africa.” International Development Planning Review 39: 15–35. doi:10.3828/idpr.2017.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebmann, H., and R. Fröhlich. 2009. “Görlitz – Kultur Als Gegenstand Eines Strategischen Projektes Der Regenerierung.” In Regenerierung der Städte, edited by M. Kühn and H. Liebmann, 245–265. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91495-4_13.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Fernandez, C., S. Fol, I. Audirac, C. Martinez-Fernandez, T. Wiechmann, E. Cunningham-Sabot, H. Yahagi, and T. Weyman. 2015. “Shrinking Cities in Australia, Japan, Europe and the USA: From a Global Process to Local Policy Responses.” Progress in Planning 105: 1–48. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoga, A. 2022. “Changing Governance Processes to Make Way for Civic Involvement: The Case of Gebrookerbos in Heerlen, Netherlands.” Sustainability 14 (10126): 1–16. doi:10.3390/su141610126.
   Google Scholar
• Matyushkina, A. 2021. ““Force Majeure”: The Transformation of Cultural Strategy as a Result of Urban Shrinkage and Economic Crisis. The Case of Riga, Latvia.” Urbana 22: 63–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.47785/urbana.7.2021.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, R., S. Spronk, and C. Caswell. 2014. “Popular Participation, Equity, and Co-Production of Water and Sanitation Services in Caracas, Venezuela.” Water International 39: 201–215. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.886844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. 2008. “With and Beyond the State – Co-Production as a Route to Political Influence, Power and Transformation for Grassroots Organizations.” Environment and Urbanization 20: 339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morckel, V., and K. Terzano. 2019. “Legacy City Residents’ Lack of Trust in Their Governments: An Examination of Flint, Michigan Residents’ Trust at the Height of the Water Crisis.” Journal of Urban Affairs 41: 585–601. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1499415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedučin, D., M. Krklješ, and Z. Gajić. 2019. “Post-Socialist Context of Culture-Led Urban Regeneration – Case Study of a Street in Novi Sad, Serbia.” Cities 85: 72–82. doi:10.1016/J.CITIES.2018.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24: 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink, D., P. Rumpel, O. Slach, C. Cortese, A. Violante, P. Calza Bini, A. Haase, V. Mykhnenko, B. Nadolu, and C. Couch. 2012. Governance of Shrinkage – Lessons Learnt from Analysis for Urban Planning and Policy, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ročak, M. 2019. “Perspectives of Civil Society on Governance of Urban Shrinkage: The Cases of Heerlen (Netherlands) and Blaenau Gwent (Wales) Compared.” European Planning Studies 27: 699–721. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1549208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ročak, M., G. Hospers, and N. Reverda. 2016a. “Civic Action and Urban Shrinkage: Exploring the Link.” Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 9: 406–418.
   Google Scholar
• Ročak, M., G. Hospers, and N. Reverda. 2016b. “Searching for Social Sustainability: The Case of the Shrinking City of Heerlen, the Netherlands.” Sustainability 8: 382. doi:10.3390/su8040382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodhouse, S. 2006. Cultural Quarters: Principles and Practice. Bristol: Intellect Books. ISBN 9781841502137.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenis, M. 2022. “Free Riga: Roadmap from “Please Give Us Space” to House Guardian Services for Owners of Vacant Property.” Accessed 13 June 2022. https://urbact.eu/files/refill-magazine-4
   Google Scholar
• Schlappa, H. 2017. “Co-Producing the Cities of Tomorrow: Fostering Collaborative Action to Tackle Decline in Europe’s Shrinking Cities.” European Urban and Regional Studies 24: 162–174. doi:10.1177/0969776415621962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, D. 2021. “Co-Productive Tools for Transcending the Divide: Building Urban–Rural Partnerships in the Spirit of the New Leipzig Charter.” Land 10. doi:10.3390/land10090894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, M., M. Sicilia, and M. Howlett. 2018. “Understanding Co-Production as a New Public Governance Tool.” Policy and Society 37: 277–293. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., and P. Pinho. 2015. “Planning for Shrinkage: Paradox or Paradigm.” European Planning Studies 23: 12–32. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.820082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryjakiewicz, T., P. Ciesiółka, and E. Jaroszewska. 2012. “Urban Shrinkage and the Post-Socialist Transformation: The Case of Poland.” Built Environment 38: 196–213. doi:10.2148/benv.38.2.196.
   Google Scholar
• Thijssen, P., and W. Van Dooren. 2016. “Who You Are/Where You Live: Do Neighbourhood Characteristics Explain Co-Production?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82: 88–109. doi:10.1177/0020852315570554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., E. Sørensen, and A. Røiseland. 2019. “Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward.” Administration & Society 51: 795–825. doi:10.1177/0095399716680057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., T. Metze, C. Wyborn, N. Klenk, and E. Louder. 2019. “The Politics of Co-Production: Participation, Power, and Transformation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42: 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17: 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2014. “Co-Production and Collaboration in Planning – The Difference.” Planning Theory & Practice 15: 62–76. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.866266.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, T., and M. Bontje. 2015. “Responding to Tough Times: Policy and Planning Strategies in Shrinking Cities.” European Planning Studies 23: 1–11. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.820077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar