Plural planning theories: cherishing the diversity of planning

References

• Behrend, L., and M. Levin-Keitel. 2020. “Planning as Scientific Discipline? Digging Deep Toward the Bottom Line of the Debate.” Planning Theory 19 (3): 306–323. doi:10.1177/1473095219897283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dake, K. 1992. “Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk.” Journal of Social Issues 48 (4): 21–37. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 1997. Essential Injustice. When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land use Disputes. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2004. Die Neunte Stadt. Wilde Grenzen und Städteregion Ruhr 2030. Wuppertal: Müller + Busmann.
   Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2008. “Plan it Without a Condom!” Planning Theory 7 (3): 301–317. doi:10.1177/1473095208096885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2016. Land Policy. Planning and the Spatial Consequences of Property. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2021. “Social Distancing and Cultural Bias: On the Spatiality of COVID-19.” Journal of the American Planning Association 87 (2): 159–166. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1824617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and S. Ney. 1998. Missing Persons. A Critique of the Social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966/1992. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1992. Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1999. “Four Cultures: The Evolution of a Parsimonious Model.” GeoJournal 47: 411–415. doi:10.1023/A:1007008025151
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1982. In the Active Voice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., O. Sykes, and P. Batey. 2009. “Planning Theory or Planning Theories? The Hydra Model and its Implications for Planning Education.” Journal for Education in the Built Environment 4 (2): 29–54. doi:10.11120/jebe.2009.04020029
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2009. Dealing with Differences. Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. 2012. “Wicked Problems and Clumsy Solutions: Planning as Expectation Management.” Planning Theory 11 (3): 242–256. doi:10.1177/1473095212440427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning – Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Keitel, M., and L. Behrend. 2022. Die Topologie der Planungstheorien. Eine Systematisierung planerischen Wissens. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V. 1999. “Grid-group Cultural Theory: An Introduction.” GeoJournal 47: 395–409. doi:10.1023/A:1007024008646
   Google Scholar
• Pojani, D. 2022. Alternative Planning History and Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reckien, D. 2021. “What Can Local Climate Planning Learn from COVID-19? Transform the City – It Saves the Climate and Lowers the Risk of Pandemics.” Planning Theory & Practice 22 (4): 645–655. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1951578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. 2021. Theory in Planning Research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, M., and M. Thompson. 1990. Divided we Stand. Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Shahab, S., T. Hartmann, and A. Jonkman. 2021. “Strategies of Municipal Land Policies: Housing Development in Germany, Belgium, and Netherlands.” European Planning Studies 29 (6): 1132–1150. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1817867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., R. Ellis, and A. Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar