European planning studies at 30 – past, present and future

References

• Adler, S., and J. Brenner. 1992. “Gender and Space: Lesbians and Gay Men in the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16 (1): 24–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00463.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 1999. “Planners as Catalysts and Initiators of Change: The New Structure Plan for Flanders.” European Planning Studies 7 (5): 587–603. doi:10.1080/09654319908720540.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2013. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by Using a Coproduction Perspective.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 46–63. doi:10.1177/1473095212452722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2015. “Ingredients for a More Radical Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42 (3): 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2017. “Some Ontological and Epistemological Challenges.” In Situated Practices of Strategic Planning. An international perspective, edited by L. Albrechts, A. Balducci, and J. Hillier, 1–11. London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9781315679181.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” DisP - The Planning Review 49 (3): 16-27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., A. Barbanente, and V. Monno. 2019. “From Stage-Managed Planning Towards A More Imaginative and Inclusive Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (8): 1489-1506. doi:10.1177/2399654419825655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2009. “Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (3): 617–633. doi:10.1068/a40208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2010. “The Future of Spatial Planning – Why Less May be More.” Town & Country Planning 79: July/August 326–328.
   Google Scholar
• Artobolevskiy, S. 1993. “Regional Policy in Russia Today: The New Role of the State.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 379–382. doi:10.1080/09654319308720227.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., and P. Longley. 1994. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Booher, D. 2008. “Civic Engagement and the Quality of Urban Places.” Planning Theory and Practice 9 (3): 383–394. doi:10.1080/14649350802277092.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. 1993. “The Cultural Dimension in Comparative Research: Making Sense of Development Control in France.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 217-229. doi:10.1080/09654319308720210.
   Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 1997. The EU Compendium of Strategic Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities. https://op.europa.eu/s/yzPk.
   Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., G. Concilio, and V. Monno. eds. 2010. Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. 1985. “Coping with Uncertainty in Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 51 (1): 63–73. doi:10.1080/01944368508976801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2018. “Retrospect and Prospect: From a New Dark Age to a New Dawn of Planning Enlightenment.” European Planning Studies 26 (9): 1701–1713. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1499429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K. 1993. “The Local and the Global in the New Urban Politics: A Critical View.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11 (4): 433–448. doi:10.1068/d110433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Curbelo, J., and F. Alburquerque. 1993. “The Lagging Regions of the EC in the Face of Economic and Monetary Union.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 275–297. doi:10.1080/09654319308720222.
   Google Scholar
• Danielzyk, R., and G. Wood. 1993. “Restructuring Old Industrial and Inner Urban Areas: A Contrastive Analysis of State Policies in Great Britain and Germany.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 123–147. doi:10.1080/09654319308720205.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G. 1993. “Environmental Zoning: The Dutch Struggle Towards Integration.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 367–377. doi:10.1080/09654319308720226.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., and B. Waterhout. 2002. The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective. No Masterplan. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice. Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garreau, J. 1992. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1993a. “Forces Shaping Urban Europe.” Urban Studies 30 (6): 883–898. doi:10.1080/00420989320080831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1993b. “Planning in the 1990s: An International Agenda.” European Planning Studies 1 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1080/09654319308720191.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and M. Castells. 1994. Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L. 1992. “Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and its Implications for Non-Work Travel.” Built Environment 18 (4): 253–267. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23288518.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendinger, and S. Oosterlynck. 2013. “Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (1): 217–234. doi:10.1068/a45121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992a. “Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Town Planning Review 63 (2): 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992b. “A Planner’s Day Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1080/01944369208975531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1995. “Discourses of Integration: Making Frameworks for Democratic Urban Planning.” In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, edited by P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham, and A. Madanipour, 251–272. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997a. “The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe.” In Making Strategic Spatial Plans, edited by P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, and B. Needham, 3–19. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997b. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and R. Williams. 1993. “European Urban Planning Systems: Diversity and Convergence.” Urban Studies 30 (4-5): 701–720. doi:10.1080/00420989320081881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. 1994. What Planners Do. Power, Politics, and Persuasion. Chicago (IL): APA Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. 1993. Great Streets. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2000. “The Crisis of National Spatio-Temporal Fix and the Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capital.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 323–360. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, P. 1994. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstler, J. 1993. Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America's Man-Made Landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. 2016. “Transforming Transport Planning in the Postpolitical Era.” Urban Studies 53 (14): 3108–3124. doi:10.1177/0042098015602649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, R., I. Masser, and P. Nijkamp. 1993. “Missing Networks: The Case of European Freight Transport.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 351–366. doi:10.1080/09654319308720225.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. 1993. “Regional Environmental Planning: Progress and Possibilities in Western Europe.” European Planning Studies 1 (1): 69–90. doi:10.1080/09654319308720195.
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, L. 2010. “Notes on Strategic Processes in Land Use Planning.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Values, edited by M. Cerreta, G. Concilio, and V. Monno, 79–85. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Motte, A. 2006. La notion de planification stratégique spatialisée en Europe (1995-2005). Lyon: PUCA.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., A. Mehmood, D. MacCallum, and B. Leubolt, eds. 2017. Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations: The Role of Research. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://op.europa.eu/s/yzPt.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, J. 1993. “Changing Urban Systems in Post-Communist Societies in Central Europe: Analysis and Prediction.” Urban Studies 30 (6): 899-905. doi:10.1080/00420989320080841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, P. 1993. “Towards a Network of Regions: The United States of Europe.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 149–168. doi:10.1080/09654319308720206.
   Google Scholar
• Parysek, J. 1993. “Unemployment – A Socially Painful Stage in the Transition from a Centrally Planned to a Market Economy: The Case of Poland.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 231–240. doi:10.1080/09654319308720211.
   Google Scholar
• Piccinato, G. 1993. “Urban Landscapes and Spatial Planning in Industrial Districts: The Case of Veneto.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 181–198. doi:10.1080/09654319308720208.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A. 1993. “The SEM and Uneven Development: Automotive Production and the ‘Older’ Peripheral Regions of the UK.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 319–349. doi:10.1080/09654319308720224.
   Google Scholar
• Prodi, R. 1993. “The Single European Market: Institutions and Economic Policies.” European Planning Studies 1 (1): 13-23. doi:10.1080/09654319308720192.
   Google Scholar
• Raekstad, P., and S. Gradin. 2019. Prefigurative Politics: Building Tomorrow Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2013. Reviving Critical Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L., and A. Forsyth. 1992. “A Gender Agenda New Directions for Planning Theory.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1): 49–59. doi:10.1080/01944369208975534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1971. Beyond the Stable State. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2010. “Apocalypse Forever? Postpolitical Populism and the Spectre of Climate Change.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2-3): 213–232. doi:10.1177/0263276409358728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornley, A. 1993. “Ideology and the By-passing of the Planning System: Case Studies of Canary Wharf, London, and the Globe, Stockholm.” European Planning Studies 1 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1080/09654319308720209.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Uranga, M., and G. Etxebarria. 1993. “Networks and Spatial Dynamics: The Case of the Basque Country.” European Planning Studies 1 (3): 299–318. doi:10.1080/09654319308720223.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2007. Revisiting the Role of Urban Planning. Concept Paper for the 2009 Global Report on Human Settlements. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2006. “Against the Populist Temptation.” Critical Inquiry 32 (3): 551–574. doi:10.1086/505378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar