558
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reviving strategic spatial planning for the challenges ahead

Pages 2318-2326 | Received 27 Jun 2023, Accepted 27 Jun 2023, Published online: 06 Jul 2023

References

  • Aaen, S., S. Kerndrup, and I. Lyhne. 2016. “Beyond Public Acceptance of Energy Infrastructure: How Citizens Make Sense and Form Reactions by Enacting Networks of Entities in Infrastructure Development.” Energy Policy 96: 576–586. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.031.
  • Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
  • Albrechts, L. 2010. “More of the Same is not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37 (6): 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068.
  • Albrechts, L. 2015. “Ingredients for a More Radical Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42 (3): 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p.
  • Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” disP - The Planning Review 49 (3): 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001.
  • Albrechts, L., A. Balducci, and J. Hillier. Eds. 2017. Situated Practices of Strategic Spatial Planning. An International Perspective. London: Routledge.
  • Albrechts, L., P. Healey, and K Kunzmann. 2003. “Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2): 113–129. doi:10.1080/01944360308976301.
  • Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2013. “The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning.” Planning Practice and Research 28 (1): 6–26. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699223.
  • Cowell, R. 2010. “Wind Power, Landscape and Strategic, Spatial Planning – the Construction of ‘Acceptable Locations’ in Wales.” Land use Policy 27 (2): 222–232. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006.
  • Cowell, R., and P. Devine-Wright. 2018. “A ‘Delivery-Democracy Dilemma’? Mapping and Explaining Policy Change for Public Engagement with Energy Infrastructure.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 20 (4): 499–517. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1443005.
  • Danish Government. 2022a. Aftale Mellem Regeringen (Socialdemokratiet), Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti og Det Konservative Folkeparti om: Opfølgning på Evaluering af Planloven m.v. 15. Juni 2022. Copenhagen: Danish Government.
  • Danish Government. 2022b. Klimaaftale om Grøn Strøm og Varme. Et Grønnere og Sikrere Danmark. Copenhagen: Danish Government.
  • Danish Ministry of Interior Affairs and Housing (2022). Forslag til Landsplanredegørelse 2022. Planlægning for Grøn Strøm til Fremtidens Danmark. Copenhagen: Ministry of Interior Affairs and Housing.
  • Danish Ministry of the Environment. 1992. Danmark på vej mod år 2018. Analyse og Vision. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.
  • Ellis, G., R. Cowell, C. Warren, P. Strachan, and J. Szarka. 2009. “Wind Power: Is There A “Planning Problem”? Expanding Wind Power: A Problem of Planning, or of Perception? The Problems Of Planning – A Developer’s Perspective Wind Farms: More Respectful and Open Debate Needed, Not Less Planning: Problem “Carrier” or Problem “Source”? “Innovative” Wind Power Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (4): 521–547. doi:10.1080/14649350903441555.
  • Grange, K. 2014. “In Search of Radical Democracy: The Ideological Character of Current Political Advocacies for Culture Change in Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (11): 2670–2685. doi:10.1068/a130257p.
  • Healey, P. 2006. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Healey, P., A. Khakee, and A. Motte eds. 1997. Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. London: UCL Press.
  • Hillier, J. 2011. “Strategic Navigation Across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning.” Town Planning Review 82 (5): 503–527. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.30.
  • Kaufman, J., and H. Jacobs. 1987. “A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1080/01944368708976632.
  • Klosterman, R. E. 1985. “Arguments for and Against Planning.” Town Planning Review 56 (1): 5–20. doi:10.3828/tpr.56.1.e8286q3082111km4.
  • Liljenfeldt, J. 2015. “Legitimacy and Efficiency in Planning Processes – (How) Does Wind Power Change the Situation?” European Planning Studies 23 (4): 811–827. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.979766.
  • Mäntysalo, R., K. Jarenko, K. Nilsson, and I. Saglie. 2015. “Legitimacy of Informal Strategic Urban Planning – Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway.” European Planning Studies 23 (2): 349–366. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861808.
  • Mäntysalo, R., I. Saglie, and G. Cars. 2011. “Between Input Legitimacy and Output Efficiency: Defensive Routines and Agonistic Reflectivity in Nordic Land-use Planning.” European Planning Studies 19 (12): 2109–2126. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.632906.
  • Monno, V. 2010. “When Strategy Meets Democracy: Exploring the Limits of the ‘Possible’ and the Value of the ‘Impossible’.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning, edited by M. Cerreta, G. Concilo, and V. Monno, 161–183. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Newman, P. 2008. “Strategic Spatial Planning: Collective Action and Moments of Opportunity.” European Planning Studies 16 (10): 1371–1383. doi:10.1080/09654310802420078.
  • Olesen, K. 2014. “The Neoliberalisation of Strategic Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory 13 (3): 288–303. doi:10.1177/1473095213499340.
  • Olesen, K. 2017. “Talk to the Hand: Strategic Spatial Planning as Persuasive Storytelling of the Loop City.” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 978–993. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1296936.
  • Olesen, K. 2020. “Infrastructure Imaginaries: The Politics of Light Rail Projects in the age of Neoliberalism.” Urban Studies 57 (9): 1811–1826. doi:10.1177/0042098019853502.
  • Olesen, K. 2020. “Transforming the Geography of the Welfare State Through Neoliberal Spatial Strategies: The Case of Denmark.” In Handbook on the Changing Geographies of the State: New Spaces of Geopolitics, edited by S. Moisio, N. Koch, A. E. G. Jonas, C. Lizotte, and J. Luukkonen, 444–456. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Olesen, K., and T. Richardson. 2012. “Strategic Planning in Transition: Contested Rationalities and Spatial Logics in Twenty-First Century Danish Planning Experiments.” European Planning Studies 20 (10): 1689–1706. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.713333.
  • Oliveira, E., S. Tobias, and A. Hersperger. 2018. “Can Strategic Spatial Planning Contribute to Land Degradation Reduction in Urban Regions?” State of the art and Future Research. Sustainability 10 (4): 949. doi:10.3390/su10040949.
  • Trygg, K., and H. Wenander. 2022. “Strategic Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development – Swedish Planners’ Institutional Capacity.” European Planning Studies 30 (10): 1985–2001. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2001792.
  • Waterhout, B., F. Othengrafen, and O. Sykes. 2013. “Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration.” Planning Practice and Research 28 (1): 141–159. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699261.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.