Do new brooms sweep clean? Striving for ‘A Just Europe’ in the Territorial Agenda 2030

References

• Austrian Presidency of the Council of the European Union. 2018. Austrian Presidency`s Directors General Seminar “Setting the Course for the Future of Territorial and Urban Policies at European level” on 13 November 2018 in Vienna, Summary report, 44. Accessed 1 September 2023. https://www.oerok.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Bilder/2.Reiter-Raum_u._Region/4.Europ-Raumentwicklung/2019_Dokumente_EU_Ratsvorsitz/EU_Vorsitz_2018_zu_TA_UA_GD-Seminar_am_13-11-18_Seminardokumentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Accessed 24 November 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/agenda-reformed-cohesion-policy-place-based-approach-meeting-european-union_en.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. 2018. “Geography and the Priority of Injustice.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2): 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1365581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMI & BBSR - Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community & Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development. 2020. Atlas for the Territorial Agenda 2030. Accessed 15 September 2022. https://www.atlasta2030.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• BMI - Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community. 2020. Implementing the Territorial Agenda 2030. Examples for a Territorial Approach in Policy Design and Delivery. Accessed 15 September 2022. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/TerritorialAgenda_OngoingExamples_201109.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., F. Holstein, and M. Toptsidou. 2015. Report on the Assessment of Territorial Cohesion and the Territorial Agenda 2020 of the European Union. Luxembourg: Luxembourg Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructures on Behalf of the EU Trio Presidency. https://amenagement-territoire.public.lu/dam-assets/fr/eu-presidency/Events/26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City/Background-Reports-_-Studies/Report-on-the-Assessment-of-Territorital-Cohesion-and-the-TA2020-_Spatial-Foresight_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bret, B. 2018. “Spatial Justice and Geographic Scales.” justice Spatiale | Spatial Justice 7: 1–14. https://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/JSSJ12_BRET_VA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2006. “Towards Justice in Planning: A Reappraisal.” European Planning Studies 14 (2): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500418192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities. 1999. European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Accessed 3 February 2023. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/ESDP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CoR – European Committee of the Regions. 2017. Opinion - The future of Cohesion Policy beyond 2020 "For a strong and effective European cohesion policy beyond 2020", 11-12. 05.2017, Rapporteur: Michael Schneider, COR-2016-01814-00-00-AC-TRA (EN) 1/20. Accessed 1 September 2023. https://cor.europa.eu/en/our-work/Pages/OpinionTimeline.aspx?opId=CDR-1814-2016.
   Google Scholar
• CoR – European Committee of the Regions. 2019. Opinion - The CoR's contribution to the renewed Territorial Agenda, with special emphasis on community-led local development, 7-9.10.2019, Rapporteur Radim Ssršeň, COR-2019-01897-00-00-AC-TRA (EN) 2/11. Accessed 1 September 2023. https://cor.europa.eu/en/our-work/Pages/OpinionTimeline.aspx?opId=CDR-1897-2019.
   Google Scholar
• CPMR. 2019. Manifesto: Regions at the Heart of a Reformed European Union, 47th CPMR General Assembly 16-18 October 2019, Palermo (Sicily, Italy). Last accessed 1 September 2023. https://cpmr.org/wpdm-package/cpmr-manifesto-regions-at-the-heart-of-a-reformed-european-union/?wpdmdl=23146&ind=1571754884163.
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, G. 2017. “The Territorial Dimension of EU Policies and Spatial Inequalities.” In Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy. Cohesion, Development, Impact Assessment and Cooperation, edited by E. Medeiros, 44–60. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., and N. Alvandipour. 2020. “A Genealogy of the Five Schools of Justice in Planning Thought.” Habitat International 101 (2020): 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102189.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2020. “Territorial Agenda 2030 and ‘A Just Europe’.” MORO Informationen 14 (9): 13–17. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/EN/publications/ministries/BMI/2020/moro-info-14-9.html;jsessionid = 46FDE0D66C17828757898C4C76CCEACB.live21303.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., and E. Brooks. 2014. “When Does Unequal Become Unfair? Judging Claims of Environmental Injustice.” Environment and Planning A 46 (11): 2686–2702. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130346p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., H. Poelman, and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2020. “The Geography of EU Discontent.” Regional Studies 54 (6): 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Lanchas, J., A. Sojka, and F. Di Pietro. 2021. “Of Losers and Laggards: The Interplay of Material Conditions and Individual Perceptions in the Shaping of EU Discontent.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 14 (3): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, P., K. Böhme, and J. Zaucha. 2014. “EU Territory and Policy-Making: From Words to Deeds to Promote Policy Integration.” European Journal of Spatial Development 12 (4): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2022. New European Bauhaus under Cohesion Policy: €50 Million Call for Innovative Projects in Cities, IP/22/6003, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6003.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. 2004. A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation: Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Accessed 18 November 2022. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4d47a6ba-9800-4d09-b2f1-b4557bbf1354.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. 2019. Press Remarks by President Von Der Leyen on the Occasion of the Adoption of the European Green Deal Communication, SPEECH/19/6749; Brussels. Retrieved 24 January 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_19_6749.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. 2020a. The European Green Deal Investment Plan and Just Transition Mechanism explained. Accessed 06 September 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_24.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. 2020b. European Semester 2020. Overview of Investment Guidance on the Just Transition Fund 2021–2027 per Member State (Annex D). Accessed 06 September 2022. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2020-european-semester-overview-investment-guidance-just-transition-fund-2021-2027-member-state_en.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. 2021. Commission Staff Document on the Territorial Just Transition Plans. Accessed 09 December 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/funding/just-transition-fund/swd_territ_just_trans_plan_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service. 2020. A Renewed Territorial Agenda for the EU; Briefing. Accessed 24 January 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/659390/EPRS_BRI(2020)659390_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2019. European Territorial Reference Framework: Synthesis Report, ESPON 2020 Programme, Luxembourg. Accessed 1 September 2023. www.espon.eu/etrf.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2010. The Just City. Cornell University Express: Ithaca and London.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2002. “Positioning European Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 10 (7): 897–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431022000013284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2007. “Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society.” European Planning Studies 15 (4): 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701232079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2009. “A Turning Point in the Development of European Spatial Planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’.” Progress in Planning 71 (1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2010. Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of age? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaugitsch, G., E. Dallhammer, C.-H. Hsiung, F. Holstein, F. Besana, S. Zillmer, S. Kruljac, and A. Ulied. 2020. State of the Art and Challenges ahead for Territorial Impact Assessments, Committee of the Regions, Commission for Territorial Cohesion Policy and EU Budget. http://www.cor.europa.eu, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 1998. “Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedural Justice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 (1): 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9801800102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INTERACT. 2020. Policy Objective 5 – Bringing Territoriality into Interreg, Accessed 24 January 2023. https://www.interact-eu.net/events/bringing-territoriality-interreg-policy-objective-5.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, K. 2011. “Social or Spatial Justice? Marcuse and Soja on the Right to the City.” City 15 (2): 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568723.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., S. Moisio, M. Weckroth, M. Woods, J. Luukkonen, F. Meyer, and J. Miggelbrink. 2019. “Re-conceptualising Territorial Cohesion Through the Prism of Spatial Justice: Critical Perspectives on Academic and Policy Discourses.” In Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation. New Geographies of Europe, edited by T. Lang and F. Görmar, 97–119. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, T., and F. Görmar (eds.). 2019. Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation - Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindekilde, L. 2014. “Discourse and Frame Analysis: In-Depth Analysis of Qualitative Data in Social Movement Research.” In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by D. della Porta, 195–227. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lüer, C., and K. Böhme. 2020. “Reenergizing European Spatial Planning.” Planning Practice & Research, 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1852675 (published online: 30 Nov 2020).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., M. Shucksmith, and E. Brooks. 2021. “The Concept of Spatial Justice and the European Union’s Territorial Cohesion.” European Planning Studies 30 (5): 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2009. “Spatial Justice: Derivative but Causal of Social Injustice.” Justice Spatiale | Spatial Justice 1: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, T. S., M. Saraiva, G. Santinha, and P. Guerra. 2018. “Re-Thinking Territorial Cohesion in the European Planning Context.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (4): 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2012. “Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations.” Political Studies Review 10 (3): 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morange, M., and A. Quentin. 2018. “Spatial Justice, Critical Thinking and Normativity in the Social Sciences.” justice Spatiale | Spatial Justice 12: 1–22. https://www.jssj.org/article/justice-spatiale-pensee-critique-et-normativite-en-sciences-sociales/.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S. 2019. “The Just City. Three Background Issues: Institutional Justice and Spatial Justice, Social Justice and Distributive Justice, Concept of Justice and Conceptions of Justice.” Planning Theory 19 (3): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219877670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSPTD - Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development. 2011. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 - Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Accessed 06 December 2022. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/territorial_agenda_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MSPTD - Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion. 2020. Territorial Agenda 2030. A Future for all Places. Accessed 15 September 2022. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/TA2030_jun2021_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MUDTCEU - Ministers of Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion of the European Union. 2007. Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Accessed 06 December 2022. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/Territorial_Tgenda_EU_2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neto Henriques, C., S. Dragović, C. Auer, and I. Gomes. 2020. “The Territorial Agenda 2030: Towards a Common Language? A Review of a Conceptual Framework.” EUROPE XXI 38 (2020): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2020.38.8.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., M. Werner, and M. Jones. 2022. “A Dialogue on Uneven Development: A Distinctly Regional Problem.” Regional Studies 57 (7): 1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2116417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., V. Béal, N. Cauchi-Duval, R. Franklin, N. Kinossian, T. Lang, T. Leibert, et al. 2023. “‘Left Behind Places’: A Geographical Etymology.” Regional Studies, 13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972 (published online: 09 Feb 2023).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., and D. Schön. 1991. “Frame-reflective Policy Discourse.” In Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, edited by C. Wagner, C. Weiss, B. Wittrock, and H. Wollmann, 262–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., and D. Schön. 1993. “Reframing Policy Discourse.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 145–166. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to do About it).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. 2019. “Tailored Polities in the Shadow of the State’s Hierarchy. The CLLD Implementation and a Future Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies 27 (4): 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. 2009. “The City and Spatial Justice.” Justice Spatiale | Spatial Justice 1: 1–5. https://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-1en4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, S. M., and T. L. Harper. 2005. “Rawls’s ‘Justice as Fairness’: A Moral Basis for Contemporary Planning Theory.” Planning Theory 4 (2): 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095205054603.
   Google Scholar
• Territorial thinkers. 2019. Territorial inequality: a new priority for Europe. Arguments for place-sensitive policies and investments, Territorial Thinkers’ Briefing Number 06, https://territorialthinkers.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., and W. Nicholls. 2017. “Planning for Social Justice: Strategies, Dilemmas, Tradeoffs.” Planning Theory 16 (1): 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215599027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weck, S., A. Madanipour, and P. Schmitt. 2022. “Place-based Development and Spatial Justice.” European Planning Studies 30 (5): 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weckroth, M., and S. Moisio. 2020. “Territorial Cohesion of What and Why? The Challenge of Spatial Justice for EU’s Cohesion Policy.” Social Inclusion 8 (4): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. 2016. “Tracing Policy Movements: Methods for Studying Learning and Policy Circulation.” Environment and Planning A 48 (2): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15605329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018. Rethinking Lagging Regions. Using Cohesion Policy to Deliver on the Potential of Europe’s Regions. Washington, DC: World Bank Report on the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar