Judging veracity impairs eyewitnesses' memory of a perpetrator

REFERENCES

• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers’ reactions to receivers’ suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1–24. 10.1080/03637759109376211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. G. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25–40. 10.1080/03637759109376212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A. S., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303–325. 10.1080/03637759409376340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, K. A. (2008). Estimating the impact of estimator variables on eyewitness identification: A fruitful marriage of practical problem solving and psychological theorizing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 815–826. doi:10.1002/acp.1485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687–706. 10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. M., Russell, E. J., Peace, K. A., & Christie J. ( 2013). Of guns and geese: A meta-analytic review of the “weapon focus” literature. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 19, 35–66. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, J. A., Feldman, R. S., & Tyler, J. M. (2004). When accurate beliefs lead to better lie detection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 764–780. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Global Deception Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74. doi:10.1177/0022022105282295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2001). Deception detection based on repeated interrogations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 85–101. 10.1348/135532501168217
   Google Scholar
• Hope, L., & Wright, D. (2007). Beyond unusual? Examining the role of attention in the weapon focus effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 951–961. doi:10.1002/acp.1307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, D. C. (2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 338–353. doi:10.1037/a0021804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, R. K., & Levine, T. R. (2011). The effect of suspicion on deception detection accuracy: Optimal level or opposing effects? Communication Reports, 24, 51–62. doi:10.1080/08934215.2011.615272
   Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus”. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 55–62. 10.1007/BF01044839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect deceit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137–149. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCornack, S. A., & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 219–230. 10.1080/03637759009376197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (1998). The effects of suspicion on the recall of cues used to make veracity judgments. Communication Reports, 11, 57–64. 10.1080/08934219809367685
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69, 144–157. doi:10.1080/714041710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. L., Ross, S. J., & Truelove, R. S. (2006). Do weapons automatically capture attention? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 871–893. doi:10.1002/acp.1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. L., & Staller, J. B. (2012). A perpetrator's accent impairs witnesses’ memory for physical appearance. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 140–150. doi:10.1037/h0093968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., McCabe, S., Woodworth, M., & Peace, K. A. (2007). “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration” … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 297–309. doi:10.1348/135532506X143958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2010). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508–514. doi:10.1348/135532509X4331SI
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S. L. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal behavior as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477–488. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Content versus source cue information as a basis for credibility judgments: The impact of task involvement. Social Psychology, 41, 93–104. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiff, J. B., Kim, H. J., & Ramesh, C. N. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326–345. 10.1177/009365092019003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., & Hick, R. F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self-generated serious and trivial situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 321–332. doi:10.1348/135532506X116101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toris, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1063–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Knight S. (2006). Police officers’, social workers’, teachers’, and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents, and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297–312. doi:10.1348/135532505X60816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177. doi:10.1080/14639220210123806
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455. doi:10.1518/001872008X288394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar