No evidence for feature overwriting in visual working memory

REFERENCES

• Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. [Software] R Paket Version 0.999357-35. URL http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Brockdorff, N., & Lamberts, K. (2000). A feature-sampling account of the time course of old–new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D. (1977). Primacy versus recency in retention of information and opinion change. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., & Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN. International Journal of Psychology (Special Issue: Short-Term/Working Memory), 34, 301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J. (2013). The neural binding problem(s). Cognitive Neurodynamics, 7(1), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, J., & Axmacher, N. (2011). The role of phase synchronisation in memory processes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(2), 105–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jünger, E. (2009). Merkmalsüberschreibung im visuellen Arbeitsgedächtnis [Feature overwriting in visual working memory]. Diploma thesis, University of Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, E. B., & Oberauer, K. (2005). Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall. Memory, 13, 333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrl, S., Merz, J., Burkhard, G., & Fischer, B. (1991). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT-A (Parallelform zum MWT-B). Erlangen: Perimed-Fachbuch-Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior research methods, 43(3), 679–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewhort, D. J. K., & Johns, E. E. (2000). The extralist-feature effect: A test of item matching in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 346–373.
   Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., & Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word length effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 541–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. (2008). How to say no: Single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 439–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., Pasiecznik, K., & Greaves, M. (2012). Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: The effect of item–distractor similarity in complex span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 665–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2001). Beyond resources - Formal models of complexity effects in age differences in working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 187–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obenauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2006). A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 601–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lange, E. B. (2008). Interference in verbal working memory: Distinguishing similarity-based confusion, feature overwriting, and feature migration. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 730–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lange, E. B. (2009). Activation and binding in verbal working memory: A dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 102–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? Psychological Review, 115, 544–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Saito, S., Logie, R. H., Morita, A., & Law, A. (2008). Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schweppe, J., Grice, M., & Rummer, R. (2011). What models of verbal working memory can learn from phonological theory: Decomposing the phonological similarity effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 256–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewes, U. (Ed.) (1991). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene-Revision 1991 (HAWIE-R). Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S. [Software] R Paket Version 7.2- 47. New York: Springer. URL http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofvalues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. [Software] R Paket Version 0.8.9. New York: Springer. URL http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar