The role of textual semantic constraints in knowledge-based inference generation during reading comprehension: A computational approach

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). Role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1459–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26, 87–108. doi:10.1080/01638539809545040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. J., Bowden, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2000). Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310–336. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (1996). Predictive inferences occur on-line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times. Discourse Processes, 22, 57–78. doi:10.1080/01638539609544966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., Castillo, M. D., & Schmalhofer, F. (2006). Strategic influence on the time course of predictive inferences in reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casteel, M. A. (2007). Contextual support and predictive inferences: What do readers generate and keep available for use? Discourse Processes, 44, 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., Limber, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 220–234. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, S. (2007). How to use the LSA web site. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 57–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of antecedent typicality and distance. Language and Speech, 33, 103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevez, A., & Calvo, M. G. (2000). Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inferences. Memory, 8, 51–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1996). Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 22, 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W. (2007). Discourse coherence and LSA. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 167–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307. doi:10.1080/01638539809545029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R., & O’Brien, E. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39, 225–242. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 534–552. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446–463. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Welsch, D. M. (1991). The construction–integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 367–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., & Levine, W. H. (1999). Prevalence and persistence of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 593–604. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klin, C. M., Murray, J. D., Levine, W. H., & Guzmán, A. E. (1999). Forward inferences: From activation to long‐term memory. Discourse Processes, 27, 241–260. doi:10.1080/01638539909545062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1230–1246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassonde, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J. (2009). Contextual specificity in the activation of predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 46, 426–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse Processes, 34, 259–280. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Golding, J. M. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Golding, J. M., & Graesser, A. C. (1992). A test of the on-line status of goal-related inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 634–647. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90032-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Lea, R. B. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the “search after meaning” principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 279–298. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Klusewitz, M. A. (1993). College students’ conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 239–252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1–30. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., de Vega, M., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). Comprehension skill, inference making, and the role of knowledge. In F. Schmalhofer, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 233–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006).Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 147–171. doi:10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes, 16, 35–53. doi:10.1080/01638539309544828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during Reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. D., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. M. (1993). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464–473. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. D., & Burke, K. A. (2003). Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill. Discourse Processes, 35, 81–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488–496. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordman, L. G., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. 1992. Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573–590. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90029-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1991). The role of context in accessing antecedents in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, P. van den Broek, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 410–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peracchi, K. A., & O’Brien, E. J. (2004). Character profiles and the activation of predictive inferences. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1044–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1998). The limits of co-occurrence: Tools and theories in language research. Discourse Processes, 25, 363–377. doi:10.1080/01638539809545033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, G. R., Keenan, J. M., & Golding, J. M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399–415. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90064-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1996). Accessing global causes during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1208–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalhofer, F., McDaniel, M. A., & Keefe, D. (2002). A unified model for predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 33, 105–132. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3302_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A. J. C., & Sharkey, N. E. (1992). Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 543–572. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90028-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shears, C., & Chiarello, C. (2004). Knowledge-based inferences are not general. Discourse Processes, 38, 31–55. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3801_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shears, C., Miller, V., Ball, M., Hawkins, A., Griggs, J., & Varner, A. (2007). Cognitive demand differences in causal inferences: Characters’ plans are more difficult to comprehend than physical causation. Discourse Processes, 43, 255–278. doi:10.1080/01638530701226238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1–38. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90026-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199–228. doi:10.1080/01638539709545013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Ferreira, F. (1983). Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 437–448. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90282-7
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421–444. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4
   Google Scholar
• Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of facilitation for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 16, 283–298. doi:10.3758/BF03197039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. doi:10.1080/01638538909544717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–140). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C. R., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169–180. doi:10.1080/01638539309544835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co‐activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087. doi:10.3758/BF03206376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable meaning. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng,Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1990). On the control of inferences in text understanding. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 447–464). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., Magliano, J. P., & Larsen, B. (2005). Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39, 165–187. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar