Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once

REFERENCES

• Anderson, N. D., Craik, F. I. M., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: I. Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology and Aging, 13, 405–423. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.3.405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audacity Team. (1999). Audacity (2.0.3). Retrieved from http://audacity.sourceforge.net
   Google Scholar
• Arcurio, L. R., Gold, J. M., & James, T. W. (2012). The response of face-selective cortex with single face parts and part combinations. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2454–2459. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, G. B. (1993). Cognitive interference from background television: Structural effects on verbal and spatial processing. Communication Studies, 44(1), 56–70. doi:10.1080/10510979309368382
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518–540. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.518
   Google Scholar
• Barense, M. D., Henson, R. N., Lee, A. C., & Graham, K. S. (2010). Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus, 20, 389–401. doi:10.1002/hipo.20641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, K., & Dougherty, M. (2007). The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy. The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 347–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 286–291. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R., & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 429–433. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2005). When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception, 34, 1117–1134. doi:10.1068/p5192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2010). Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 448–461. doi:10.1037/a0016471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciaramelli, E., Ghetti, S., & Borsotti, M. (2009). Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation. Cortex, 45, 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. J. B., & Butler L. T. (2008). Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval. Memory, 16, 763–772. doi:10.1080/09658210802261116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coin, C., & Tiberghien, G. (1997). Encoding activity and face recognition. Memory, 5, 545–568. doi:10.1080/741941479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is “special” about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482–498. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., Davidson, P. S. R., Glisky, E. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2004). Contribution of frontal and temporal lobe function to memory interference from divided attention effects at retrieval. Neuropsychology, 18, 514–525. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Guild, E. (2009). Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 24–32. doi:10.1037/a0012870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155–176. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 731–744. doi:10.3758/BF03196429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2003). Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 18, 219–230. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., Moscovitch, M., Ziegler, M., & Grady, C. (2005). Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1115–1127. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., Pacurer, A., Moscovitch, M., & Grady, C. (2006). Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in young and old adults. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2452–2464. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, M. A., Wammes, J. D., & Hsiao, J. H. (2013). Representation of linguistic information determines its susceptibility to memory interference. Brain Sciences, 3, 1244–1260. doi:10.3390/brainsci3031244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are “spatial”—Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1023–1039. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Garrido, A. A., Ramos-Loyo, J., Gomez-Velazquez, F. R., Alvelais Alarcón, M., & Moises de la Serna Tuya, J. (2007). Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65, 141–151. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttentag, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1988). Adult age differences in memory for imagined and performed actions. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 107–108. doi:10.1093/geronj/43.4.P107
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J., & Marsh, R. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1483–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219–264. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, L., & Dewhurst, S. (2007). Divided attention at retrieval disrupts knowing but not remembering. Memory, 15, 664–674. doi:10.1080/09658210701467137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90282-2
   Google Scholar
• McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Isolating holistic processing in faces (and perhaps objects). In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 92–119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C., Bransford, J., & Franks, J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. E. (2004). The ups and downs of face perception: Evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 33, 387–398. doi:10.1068/p5188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, D. F., Betts, L. R., & Wilson, H. R. (2010). Decoding of faces and face components in face-sensitive human visual cortex. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 28. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00028
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2002). The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception. Cognition, 82, 225–257. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00160-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1975). Short-term retention of pictures and words: Evidence for dual coding systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(2), 95–102. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.1.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1976a). Differential distraction effects in short-term and long-term retention of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 541–547. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Siegel, A. W., & Dhawan, M. (1976b). Short-term retention of pictures and words as a function of type of distraction and length of delay interval. Memory & Cognition, 4, 11–15. doi:10.3758/BF03213249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., O’Brien, M., & Wasson, C. (2012). Cross-race (but not same-race) face identification is impaired by presenting faces in a group rather than individually. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 488–495. doi:10.1037/h0093933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17(1), 43–63. doi:10.1068/p170043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah M. J. (1991). Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 367–372. doi:10.3758/BF03212229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225–245. doi:10.1080/14640749308401045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1983). Ecphoric processes in episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302, 361–371. doi:10.1098/rstb.1983.0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Belle, G., De Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Busigny, T., & Rossion, B. (2010). Whole not hole: Expert face recognition requires holistic perception. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2620–2629. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wais, P. E., Martin, G. M., Gazzaley, A. (2012). The impact of visual distraction on episodic retrieval in older adults. Brain Research, 1430, 78–85. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.10.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wais, P., Rubens, M., Boccanfuso, J., & Gazzaley, A. (2010). Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of visual distraction on retrieval of long-term memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 8541–8550. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1478-10.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 397–403. doi:10.1518/001872008X288394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi:10.1037/h002747
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. X., Xiao, Z., & Weng, X. (2012). Neural evidence for direct meaning access from orthography in Chinese word reading. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 240–245. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar