Advanced search
Publication Cover
Memory Volume 24, 2016 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
235
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions

Sebastian DummelDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Jan RummelDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
Pages 1435-1443 | Received 20 Mar 2015, Accepted 02 Nov 2015, Published online: 07 Dec 2015

References

  • Bröder, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2007). Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 895–900. doi:10.3758/BF03194118
  • Bröder, A., Newell, B. R., & Platzer, C. (2010). Cue integration vs . Exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory : A matter of cue representation. Judgement and Decision Making, 5(5), 326–338.
  • Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003a). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(3), 193–213. doi:10.1002/bdm.442
  • Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003b). Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132(2), 277–293. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.277
  • Busemeyer, J. R., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). Computational models of decision making. In D. J. Koehler & H. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 133–154). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 141–167). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.506
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Toward an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215–228.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2012). Decisions beyond boundaries: When more information is processed faster than less. Acta Psychologica, 139(3), 532–542. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.009
  • Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Jekel, M. (2014). What is adaptive about adaptive decision making? A parallel constraint satisfaction account. Cognition, 133(3), 641–666. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.017
  • Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2011). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 180–195. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000084
  • Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109(1), 75–90. doi:10.1037/h0092846
  • Khader, P. H., Pachur, T., & Jost, K. (2013). Automatic activation of attribute knowledge in heuristic inference from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 372–377. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0334-7
  • Lee, M. D., & Cummins, T. D. (2004). Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the “take the best” and the “rational” models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 343–352. doi: 10.3758/BF03196581
  • Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
  • Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing “one-reason” decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(1), 53–65. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.53
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552.
  • Platzer, C., & Bröder, A. (2012). Most people do not ignore salient invalid cues in memory-based decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 654–661. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0248-4
  • Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010). Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychological Review, 117(3), 864–901. doi: 10.1037/a0019737
  • Renkewitz, F., & Jahn, G. (2012). Memory indexing: A novel method for tracing memory processes in complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1622–1639. doi:10.1037/a0028073
  • Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.