458
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evidence of a metacognitive benefit to memory?

&
Pages 317-325 | Received 22 Dec 2015, Accepted 21 Mar 2016, Published online: 06 Apr 2016

References

  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Goldsmith, M. (2016). Metacognitive quality-control processes in memory retrieval and reporting. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 357–385). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.28
  • Higham, P. A. (2002). Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition, 30, 67–80. doi:10.3758/BF03195266
  • JASP Team. (2016). JASP (Version 0.7.5.5) [Computer software].
  • Kelley, C. M., & Sahakyan, L. (2003). Memory, monitoring, and control in the attainment of memory accuracy. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 704–721. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00504-1
  • Koriat, A. & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297–315. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.3.297
  • Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
  • Lai, K. & Kelley, K. (2012). Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: Sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 65, 350–370. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02029.x
  • Mitchum, A. L. Kelley, C., & Fox, M. C. (2016). Asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 200–219. doi:10.1037/a0039923
  • Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Kilb, A. (2012). How the measurement of memory processes can affect memory performance: The case of remember/know judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 194–203. doi:10.1037/a0025256
  • Perfect, T. J., & Stollery, B. T. (1993). Memory and metamemory performance in older adults: One deficit or two? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 46, 119–135. doi:10.1080/14640749308401069
  • Perfect, T. J. & Weber, N. (2012). How should witnesses regulate the accuracy of their identification decisions: One step forwards, Two steps back? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1810–1818. doi:10.1037/a0028461
  • R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/
  • Soderstrom, N. C., Clark, C. T., Halamish, V. & Bjork, E. L. (2015). Judgments of learning as memory modifiers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 41, 553–558. doi:10.1037/a0038388

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.