Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring

References

• Ball, B. H., Knight, J. B., Dewitt, M. R., & Brewer, G. A. (2013). Individual differences in the delayed execution of prospective memories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2411–2425. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.785576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S., & West, R. (2008). Working memory, executive control, and aging. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 3, 311–372.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., Knight, J. B., Marsh, R. L., & Unsworth, N. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory and Cognition, 38(3), 304–311. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., & Unsworth, N. (2012). Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(3), 407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg, J. M., & Scullin, M. K. (2013). Controlling intentions. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2463–2471. doi: 10.1177/0956797613494850
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Smith, R. E., & Shaw, P. (1998). Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions. Psychological Science, 9(4), 284–288. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327–342. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4(1), 106. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.1.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(3), 251. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak, & F. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of Processing in Human Memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., & Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. The American Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 37–64. doi: 10.2307/1422342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, W. L., Weinberg, W. B., Alford, H. S., Mulvey, E. K., & Kaeochinda, K. F. (2006). Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1028–1032. doi: 10.3758/BF03213920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegel, M., Jäger, T., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues. Psycholgy & Aging, 23(1), 203–208. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2007). Comparing older and younger adults in an event-based prospective memory paradigm containing an output monitoring component. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 168–188. doi: 10.1080/138255891007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Hancock, T. W., & Munsayac, K. (2002). Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 302–311. doi: 10.3758/BF03195291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. P., Manning, M., Einstein, G. O., Becker, L., & Owens, M. (2015). The best of both worlds: Emotional cues improve prospective memory execution and reduce repetition errors. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(3), 357–375. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2014.952263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Bugg, J. M., Ramuschkat, G. M., Kliegel, M., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). Repetition errors in habitual prospective memory: Elimination of Age differences via complex actions or appropriate resource allocation. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16(5), 563–588. doi: 10.1080/13825580902866646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., & Kidder, D. P. (1996). Prospective memory and medication adherence. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 369–390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L. (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A., Berish, D. E., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2004). Construct validity and age sensitivity of prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 32(7), 1133–1148. doi: 10.3758/BF03196887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaper, P., & Grundgeiger, T. (2017). Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1423–1438. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1187182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzspahn, K. M., Stahl, C., Zeintl, M., Kaller, C. P., & Kliegel, M. (2013). The role of shifting, updating, and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1544. doi: 10.1037/a0030579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 46–53. doi: 10.1037/a0026112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skladzien, E. M. (2010). Age differences in output-monitoring accuracy. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(2), 240–256. doi: 10.1080/13825580903265673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Bayen, J. (2006). The source of adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 623–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory. Experimental Psychology, 52(4), 243–256. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimori, E., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Limiting attentional resources influences performance and output monitoring of an event-based prospective memory task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 112–128. doi: 10.1080/09541440802003108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touron, D. R., & Hertzog, C. (2004). Distinguishing age differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic skill acquisition. Psychology and Aging, 19(3), 452. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2009). There’s more to the working memory capacity—fluid intelligence relationship than just secondary memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 931–937. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2012). Variation in cognitive failures: An individual differences investigation of everyday attention and memory failures. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: An examination of differences in accessibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(12), 2397–2410. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.690438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (1988). Capacity theory and the processing of inferences. In L. Light, & D. Burke (Eds.), Language, Memory, and Aging (pp. 154–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, S., Kliegel, M., & Ihle, A. (2016). An individual difference perspective on focal versus nonfocal prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 44(8), 1192–1203. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0628-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar