Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics

References

• Andersen, S. M., Carlson, C. A., Carlson, M. A., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, F., Diedenhofen, B., Ullrich, S., & Musch, J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 527–535. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339–360. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice]. (2011). Urteil vom 14. April 2011 [Judgment on April 14, 2011], Az. 4 StR 501/10. Retrieved from https://openjur.de/u/165390.html
   Google Scholar
• Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 286–291. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., & Carlson, M. A. (2014). An evaluation of lineup presentation, weapon presence, and a distinctive feature using ROC analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., Carlson, M. A., Weatherford, D. R., Tucker, A., & Bednarz, J. (2016). The effect of backloading instructions on eyewitness identification from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1005–1013. doi: 10.1002/acp.3292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., & Gronlund, S. D. (2011). Searching for the sequential line-up advantage: A distinctiveness explanation. Memory, 19, 916–929. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.613846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., Gronlund, S. D., & Clark, S. E. (2008). Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 118–128. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. A., Jones, A. R., Goodsell, C. A., Carlson, M. A., Weatherford, D. R., & Bednarz, J. E. (2016, November). Suspect position in a simultaneous lineup affects eyewitness identification. Talk presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629–654. doi: 10.1002/acp.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E. (2012). Costs and benefits of eyewitness identification reform: Psychological science and public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238–259. doi: 10.1177/1745691612439584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E., & Davey, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 151–172. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-2418-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E., & Godfrey, R. D. (2009). Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 22–42. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E., Moreland, M. B., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 251–267. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0516-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, I. G., & Kroll, N. E. (2005). Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: Evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1186–1198. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobolyi, D. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2013). Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 345–357. doi: 10.1037/a0034596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen, M. L., Smith, A. M., Olaguez, A. P., & Skerritt-Perta, A. S. (2017). An examination of showups conducted by law enforcement using a field-simulation paradigm. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23, 1–22. doi: 10.1037/law0000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowe, H. D., Smith, H. M., Karoğlu, N., Onwuegbusi, T. O., & Rai, L. (2016). Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures. Memory, 24, 306–314. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1004350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. A., Gronlund, S. D., & Carlson, C. A. (2010). Exploring the sequential lineup advantage using WITNESS. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 445–459. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9215-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gronlund, S. D., Carlson, C. A., Dailey, S. B., & Goodsell, C. A. (2009). Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 140–152. doi: 10.1037/a0015082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund, S. D., Carlson, C. A., Neuschatz, J. S., Goodsell, C. A., Wetmore, S. A., Wooten, A., & Graham, J. (2012). Showups versus lineups: An evaluation using ROC analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund, S. D., Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2014). Evaluating eyewitness identification procedures using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 3–10. doi: 10.1177/0963721413498891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horry, R., Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2012). Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 346–360. doi: 10.1037/a0029779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocence Project. (2015). Eyewitness misidentification. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/eyewitness-misidentification
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556–564. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McQuiston-Surrett, D., Malpass, R. S., & Tredoux, C. G. (2006). Sequential vs. simultaneous lineups: A review of methods, data, and theory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 137–169. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.2.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickes, L., Flowe, H. D., & Wixted, J. T. (2012). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 361–376. doi: 10.1037/a0030609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickes, L., Moreland, M. B., Clark, S. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2014). Missing the information needed to perform ROC analysis? Then compute d′, not the diagnosticity ratio. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Wetmore, S. A., Key, K. N., Cash, D. K., Gronlund, S. D., & Goodsell, C. A. (2016). A comprehensive evaluation of showups. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 43–69). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M., & Synnott, J. (2009). A position of influence: Variation in offender identification rates by location in a lineup. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 139–149. doi: 10.1002/jip.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., Sauer, J. D., & Holt, G. A. (2017). Undermining position effects in choices from arrays, with implications for police lineups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 71–84. doi: 10.1037/xap0000109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Questback. (2015). Enterprise feedback suite. Survey version 10.5. Cologne: Questback.
   Google Scholar
• Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J., & Müller, M. (2011). Proc: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 77–84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman, H. R. (1996). Sensation and perception: An integrated approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision-times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22–33. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459–473. doi: 10.1023/A:1012888715007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N., Dysart, J., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 99–139. doi: 10.1037/a0021650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sučić, I., Tokić, D., & Ivešić, M. (2015). Field study of response accuracy and decision confidence with regard to lineup composition and lineup presentation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 798–819. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1054383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toftely, S. M. (2015). Eyewitness identification: An investigation of the feature-detection hypothesis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11244/14621
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2011). A test of the simultaneous vs. sequential lineup methods. Des Moines, IA: American Judicature Society. Retrieved from http://216.36.221.170/wc/pdfs/EWID_PrintFriendly.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. (2015). Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 1–14. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willing, S., Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2017). Presenting a highly similar foil prior to the suspect reduces the identifiability of the perpetrator in sequential lineups: An analysis based on receiver operating characteristics (Manuscript under review).
   Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Gronlund, S. D., & Mickes, L. (2014). Policy regarding the sequential lineup is not informed by probative value but is informed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 17–18. doi: 10.1177/0963721413510934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2014). A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification. Psychological Review, 121, 262–276. doi: 10.1037/a0035940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Kluender, K. R., Levi, D. M., Bartoshuk, L. M., Herz, R. S., Klatzky, R. L. … Merfeld, D. M. (2009). Sensation & perception (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar