Collaborative remembering reduces suggestibility: A study with the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale

References

• Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (1996). Collaboration and memory: Effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171–181. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::AID-ACP385>3.0.CO;2-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, S. J., Harris, C. B., & Rajaram, S. (2015). Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: Multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärthel, G. A., Wessel, I., Huntjens, R. C., & Verwoerd, J. (2017). Collaboration enhances later individual memory for emotional material. Memory, 25, 636–646. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1208248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L, III. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497–507. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<497::AID-ACP665>3.0.CO;2-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco, A., & Curci, A. (2015). Measuring interrogative suggestibility with the Italian version of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS): Factor structure and discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 258–265. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231–244. doi: 10.1080/09658210701804495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumen, H. M., & Stern, Y. (2011). Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 147–154. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0023-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caso, L., Soardi, F., & Paccanelli, F. (2013). La suggestionabilità interrogativa nei bambini: una ricerca sperimentale sull’influenza dell’età e dell’autorevolezza dell’intervistatore [The Interrogative suggestibility in school age children: An experimental study on age and interviewer authoritativeness influence]. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 40, 313–329.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curci, A., & Bianco, A. (2014). Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Manuale d’uso. Firenze: Giunti O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1556–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, I. B., Lally, S. J., & Sexton, J. E. (2012). A United States forensic sample for the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 749–763. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485. doi: 10.3758/BF03193873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, E. G., & Powell, M. B. (2009). A psychometric evaluation of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales: Problems associated with measuring suggestibility as a difference score composite. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. A., Hannah, P. J., Nicholl, M. C., & Ferri, J. M. (2017). The confident co-witness: The effects of misinformation on memory after collaborative discussion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 225–235. doi: 10.1002/acp.3320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1983). Suggestibility, intelligence, memory recall and personality: An experimental study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 35–37. doi: 10.1192/bjp.142.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303–314. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). Interrogative suggestibility: Its relationship with assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, and method of coping. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 159–166. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00764.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). Interrogative suggestibility: Factor analysis of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2). Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 479–481. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales manual. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G., Vagni, M., Maiorano, T., & Pajardi, D. (2016). Age and memory related changes in children’s immediate and delayed suggestibility using the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. (2012). Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 179–194. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.608590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. (2013). Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, E., Cardwell, B. A., & Roy, R. A. (2013). Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists. Memory, 21, 875–890. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.769058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karns, T. E., Irvin, S. J., Suranic, S. L., & Rivardo, M. G. (2009). Collaborative recall reduces the effect of a misleading post event narrative. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, S. B., & Thorley, C. (2016). A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1141–1164. doi: 10.1037/bul0000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. I. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995–1009. doi: 10.3758/BF03194318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Boyle, M. M. (1995). Collaboration in recall: Do pairs of people cross-cue each other to produce new memories? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48, 141–152. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401381
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Kirby, P. (1992). Are two heads better than one? Experimental investigations of the social facilitation of memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 525–543. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350060606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaboration both hurts and helps memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 76–81. doi: 10.1177/0963721411403251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 95–100. doi: 10.3758/BF03194034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivardo, M. G., Rutledge, A. T., Chelecki, C., Stayer, B. E., Quarles, M., & Kline, A. (2013). Collaborative recall of eyewitness event increases misinformation effect at 1 week. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 495–512.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Blatz, C. W., & Restorick, E. (2008). Collaboration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 85–92. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi-Arnaud, C., Cestari, V., Marques, V. R. S., Bechi Gabrielli, G., & Spataro, P. (2017). Collaboration in implicit memory: Evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation. Psychological Research, 81, 55–65. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0725-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi-Arnaud, C., Pieroni, L., Spataro, P., & Cestari, V. (2011). Effects of pair collaboration and word-frequency in recognition memory: A study with the remember-know procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 516–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00912.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, T., Leppink, J., Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (2009). Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 149–155. doi: 10.1348/135532507X190207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M. (2007). Does collaborative remembering reduce false memories? British Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1348/000712606X101628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M., & Saito, S. (2004). Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition? Memory, 12, 722–731. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt, A., & van Koppen, P. J. (2016). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory, 24, 669–682. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1042884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, I., Zandstra, A. E., Hengeveld, H. E., & Moulds, M. L. (2015). Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film. Memory, 23, 437–444. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.895384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004). Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1080–1083. doi: 10.3758/BF03196740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189–202. doi: 10.1348/000712600161781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaron-Antar, A., & Nachson, I. (2006). Collaborative remembering of emotional events: The case of Rabin’s assassination. Memory, 14, 46–56. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar