References
- Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. (2020, January 15). Online timing accuracy and precision: A comparison of platforms, browsers, and participant’s devices. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jfeca
- Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
- Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2001). Fuzzy-trace theory: Dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 28, 42–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80062-3
- Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. Oxford University Press.
- Bridges, D., Pitiot, A., MacAskill, M. R., & Peirce, J. W. (2020, January 20). The timing mega-study: Comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d6nu5
- Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspective on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964
- Calderon, S., Mac Giolla, E., Granhag, P. A., & Ask, K. (2017). Do true and false intentions differ in level of abstraction? A test of construal level theory in deception contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02037
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Friedman, R. S., Fishbach, A., Förster, J., & Werth, L. (2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_18
- Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
- Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1488
- Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020495
- Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005
- Fukukura, J., Ferguson, M. J., & Fujita, K. (2013). Psychological distance can improve decision making under information overload via gist memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030730
- Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
- Gallo, D. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. Psychology Press.
- Gu, X., & Tse, C.-S. (2018). Abstractness and desirableness in the human values system: Self-transcendence values are construed more abstractly, but felt more closely than are self-enhancement values. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12335
- Henderson, M. D. (2013). When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: The role of construal level in attraction to choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.001
- Henderson, M. D., Wakslak, C. J., Fujita, K., & Rohrbach, J. (2011). Construal level theory and spatial distance. Social Psychology, 42(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000060
- Huff, M. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2013). When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031338
- Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1023
- Ikeda, K., Hattori, Y., & Kobayashi, M. (2016). Thinking about “why” eliminates retrieval-induced forgetting: Levels of construal affect retrieval dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2180
- Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019843
- Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015671
- Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353–383). Guilford Press.
- Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- McCabe, D. P., Presmanes, A. G., Robertson, C. L., & Smith, A. D. (2004). Item-specific processing reduces false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196739
- Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
- Neely, J. H., & Tse, C.-S. (2007). Semantic relatedness effects on true and false memories in episodic recognition: A methodological and empirical review. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 313–351). Psychology Press.
- Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Potthoff, J., La Face, A., & Schienle, A. (2020). The color nutrition information paradox: Effects of suggested sugar content on food cue reactivity in healthy young women. Nutrients, 12(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020312
- Roediger, H. L., Balota, D. A., & Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and arousal of false memories. In J. Roediger, S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). American Psychological Association Press.
- Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
- Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
- Stadler, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211543
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
- Tse, C.-S., Huang, Y., Zeng, T., Zhou, Y., & Chan, Y.-L. (in press). The influence of congruency proportion, target eccentricity, and valence strength on the spatial-valence metaphoric congruency effect in a word valence judgment task. Psychological Research.
- Tse, C.-S., Li, Y., & Neill, W. T. (2011). Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 137(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.013
- Tussing, A. A., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy. American Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423379
- Tversky, B., & Marsh, E. J. (2000). Biased retellings of events yield biased memories. Cognitive Psychology, 40(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0720
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
- Westerberg, C. E., & Marsolek, C. J. (2003). Sensitivity reductions in false recognition: A measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.747