Retrieval practice reduces relative forgetting over time

References

• Abbott, E. E. (1909). On the analysis of the factor of recall in the learning process. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 11(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093018
   Google Scholar
• Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2016). Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0539-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2020). Would you like to learn more? Retrieval practice plus feedback can increase motivation to keep on studying. Cognition, 201, Article 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, M., Haller, V., Köck, H., Pötschke, S., Heib, D., Schabus, M., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2019). Sleep reduces the testing effect—But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, M., & Roediger, H. L. (2018). The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L. (2017). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory (Hove, England), 25(6), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. B., & Tweney, R. D. (1997). Artifactual power curves in forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 724–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J. W., Ferreira, C. S., Norman, K. A., & Wimber, M. (2017). Retrieval as a fast route to memory consolidation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. T., Holterman, C., & Abel, M. (2014). Sleep can reduce the testing effect: It enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäuml, K.-H. T., & Trißl, L. (2022). Selective memory retrieval can revive forgotten memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(8), Article e2114377119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114377119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe, & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 918–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., & Delosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Vul, E. (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K. (2010). Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials. Memory (Hove, England), 18(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903405737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 487–514). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
   Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 61, pp. 237–284). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, O., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2016). Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W., & Peterson, D. J. (2015). The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, N. W., & Picklesimer, M. (2016). Attention and the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(6), 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2016). Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0407-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racsmány, M., Szőllősi, A., & Marián, M. (2020). Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice. Memory & Cognition, 48(7), 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01041-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Standard progressive matrices. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-Enhanced learning. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development for R [Computer software]. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 734–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 11(6), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1952). A note on functional relations obtained from group data. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siler, J., & Benjamin, A. S. (2020). Long-term inference and memory following retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 48(4), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00997-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, N. C., Kerr, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (2016). The critical importance of retrieval—And spacing—For learning. Psychological Science, 27(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615617778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(9), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063404
   Google Scholar
• Storm, B. C., Friedman, M. C., Murayama, K., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). On the transfer of prior tests or study events to subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. P., Wenger, S. K., & Bartling, C. A. (1978). How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Toppino, T. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2009). The testing effect and the retention interval. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trißl, L., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2022). Selective restudy can reset recall of forgotten information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(6), 2202–2210. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02131-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(3), 289–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M., Ewers, M., & Buonanno, J. (2003). Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. Memory (Hove, England), 11(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1972). Trace resistance and the decay of long-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9(4), 418–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(72)90015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. A. (1974). Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. Memory & Cognition, 2(4), 775–780. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, T. D. (1982). Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T. (2004). On common ground: Jost’s (1897) law of forgetting and Ribot’s (1881) law of retrograde amnesia. Psychological Review, 111(4), 864–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T. (2022). Absolute versus relative forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(12), 1775–1786. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2(6), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1997). Genuine power curves in forgetting: A quantitative analysis of individual subject forgetting functions. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar