0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Open science practices in the false memory literatureOpen DataOpen MaterialsPreregistered

ORCID Icon, , , &
Received 06 May 2024, Accepted 24 Jul 2024, Published online: 05 Aug 2024

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Felici, G. (2019). Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.003
  • Asarnow, J., Bloch, M. H., Brandeis, D., Alexandra Burt, S., Fearon, P., Fombonne, E., Green, J., Gregory, A., Gunnar, M., Halperin, J. M., Hollis, C., Jaffee, S., Klump, K., Landau, S., Lesch, K., Oldehinkel, A. J., Peterson, B., Ramchandani, P., Sonuga-Barke, E., … Zeanah, C. H. (2018). Special editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry–next steps? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(7), 826–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12929
  • Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454
  • Bakker, M., Veldkamp, C. L., van Assen, M. A., Crompvoets, E. A., Ong, H. H., Nosek, B. A., Soderberg, C. K., Mellor, D., & Wicherts, J. M. (2020). Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations. PLoS Biology, 18(12), e3000937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937
  • Barbui, C., Gureje, O., Puschner, B., Patten, S., & Thornicroft, G. (2016). Implementing a data sharing culture. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(4), 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016000330
  • Borgerson, K. (2009). Valuing evidence: Bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0086
  • Bornstein, B. H., & Meissner, C. A. (2023). Influencing policy and procedure with law-psychology research: Why, when, where, how, and what. In D. DeMatteo & K. C. Scherr (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychology and law (pp. 18–35). Oxford Academic.
  • Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. Oxford University Press.
  • Brewin, C. R., & Andrews, B. (2017). Creating memories for false autobiographical events in childhood: A systematic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3220
  • Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
  • Chartier, C., Kline, M., McCarthy, R., Nuijten, M., Dunleavy, D. J., & Ledgerwood, A. (2018). The cooperative revolution is making psychological science better. APS Observer, 31(10). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-cooperative-revolution-is-making-psychological-science-better
  • Chin, J., Zeiler, K., Dilevski, N., Holcombe, A., Gatfield-Jeffries, R., Bishop, R., Vazire, S., & Schiavone, S. (2023). The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018-2020): An observational study. F1000Research, 12, 144. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127563.1
  • Claesen, A., Gomes, S., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2021). Comparing dream to reality: An assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies. Royal Society Open Science, 8(10), 211037. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211037
  • Corker, K. S. (2018). Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analyses. In L. Jussim, S. Stevens, & J. Krosnick (Eds.), Research integrity: Best practices for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 150–174). Oxford University Press.
  • Eden, D. (2002). From the editors: Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 841–846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.7718946
  • Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2013). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening science (pp. 17–47). Springer.
  • Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000007
  • Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One, 5(10), e13636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
  • Hanel, P. H., & Haase, J. (2017). Predictors of citation rate in psychology: Inconclusive influence of effect and sample size. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160
  • Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., deMayo, B. E., Long, B., Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C. (2021). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the Journal Psychological Science: An observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494
  • Hardwicke, T. E., Mathur, M. B., Macdonald, K., Nilsonne, G., Banks, G. C., Kidwell, M. C., ... & Frank, M. C. (2018). Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition. Royal Society open science, 5(8), 180448.
  • Hardwicke, T. E., Thibault, R. T., Kosie, J. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2022). Estimating the prevalence of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in psychology (2014–2017). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620979806
  • Hardwicke, T. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., Bendixen, T., Crüwell, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2020). An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017). Royal Society Open Science, 7(2), 190806. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190806
  • Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056
  • Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167
  • Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
  • Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., Kennett, C., Slowik, A., Sonnleitner, C., Hess-Holden, C., Errington, T. M., Fiedler, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
  • Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, Jr., R. B., Bahník, Š, Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
  • Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, Jr., R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Sowden, W. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
  • Lacy, J. W., & Stark, C. E. (2013). The neuroscience of memory: Implications for the courtroom. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(9), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3563
  • Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021). Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLoS One, 16(6), e0253129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253129
  • Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079151
  • Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in psychological science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617704015
  • Lindsay, D. S., Simons, D. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2016). Research preregistration 101. APS Observer, 29(10), 14–16.
  • Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
  • Louderback, E. R., Gainsbury, S. M., Heirene, R. M., Amichia, K., Grossman, A., Bernhard, B. J., & LaPlante, D. A. (2023). Open science practices in gambling research publications (2016–2019): A scoping review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 39(2), 987–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10120-y
  • Martone, M. E., Garcia-Castro, A., & VandenBos, G. R. (2018). Data sharing in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000242
  • McNutt, M. (2014). Reproducibility. Science, 343(6168), 229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250475
  • Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
  • Muschalla, B., & Schönborn, F. (2021). Induction of false beliefs and false memories in laboratory studies—A systematic review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(5), 1194–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2567
  • Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
  • Nosek, B. A., Beck, E. D., Campbell, L., Flake, J. K., Hardwicke, T. E., Mellor, D. T., van ’t Veer, A. E., & Vazire, S. (2019). Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10), 815–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009
  • Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
  • Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
  • Otgaar, H., & Howe, M. (2024). Testing memory. Memory (Hove, England), 32(3), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2325293
  • Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  • Pickrell, J. E., McDonald, D. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2016). Misinformation effect. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions (pp. 406–423). Psychology Press.
  • Redding, R. E. (1998). How common-sense psychology can inform law and psycholegal research. U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable, 5(1), 6.
  • Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
  • Schacter, D. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Memory and law: What can cognitive neuroscience contribute? Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3294
  • Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
  • Scoboria, A., Wade, K. A., Lindsay, D. S., Azad, T., Strange, D., Ost, J., & Hyman, I. E. (2017). A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory (Hove, England), 25(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1260747
  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
  • Stodden, V., Seiler, J., & Ma, Z. (2018). An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2584–2589. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708290115
  • Vazire, S. (2017). Quality uncertainty erodes trust in science. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.74
  • Verschuere, B., Yasrebi-de Kom, F. M., van Zelm, I., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2021). A plea for preregistration in personality disorders research: The case of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 35(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_426
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
  • Washburn, A. N., Hanson, B. E., Motyl, M., Skitka, L. J., Yantis, C., Wong, K. M., Sun, J., Prims, J. P., Mueller, A. B., Melton, Z. J., & Carsel, T. S. (2018). Why do some psychology researchers resist adopting proposed reforms to research practices? A description of researchers’ rationales. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918757427
  • Wessel, I., Albers, C. J., Zandstra, A. R. E., & Heininga, V. E. (2020). A multiverse analysis of early attempts to replicate memory suppression with the Think/No-think Task. Memory (Hove, England), 28(7), 870–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1797095
  • Woods, H. B., & Pinfield, S. (2022). Incentivising research data sharing: A scoping review. Wellcome Open Research, 6, 355. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17286.2