Language awareness and perception of connected speech in a second language

References

• Abry, D., & Veldeman-Abry, J. (2007). La phonétique: Audition, pronunciation, correction [Phonetics: Listening, pronunciation, correction]. Paris: CLE International.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27, 459–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns: Lessons from training Japanese adults on the English /(turned r)/-/l/ contrast. In J. Edwards & G. Hansen (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• CAN-8 Virtual Lab (1990) [Computer software]. Toronto: Sounds Virtual.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., & Lecumberri, L.G. (1999). The effect of training on the discrimination of English vowels. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 37, 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne-Muzar, C. (1996). L’apport des faits phonétiques au développement de la comprehension [The influence of phonetic skills on the development of listening comprehension in a second language]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 386–415.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne-Muzar, C., & Schneiderman, E. (1993). Second language accent: The role of the pedagogical environment. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 31, 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cool Edit (2000) [Computer software]. Scottsdale, AZ: Syntrillium Software Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejean de la Batie, B., & Bradley, D. (1995). Resolving word boundaries in spoken French: Native and non-native strategies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, J., Laks, B., & Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain: Usages, variétés, et structures [The phonology of contemporary French: Usage, varieties, and structures]. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (Eds.), Romanistische korpuslinguistik – Korpora und gesprochene sprache [Romance language corpus linguistics: Corpora and spoken language] (pp. 93–106). Tübigen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fay Baulu, C., & Legoux, M.-N. (1990). Variations phonétiques et grammaticales en français parlé [Phonetic and grammatical variation in spoken French] (3rd ed.). Montréal: Sodilis.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60, 222–232.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2010). Language awareness and second language pronunciation: A classroom study. Language Awareness, 19, 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, D. (1994). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second language learner. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moodle (Version 2.2) (2011) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http: //moodle.org
   Google Scholar
• Polat, B. (2013). Language experience interviews: What can they tell us about individual differences? System, 41, 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplack, S., & Walker, D. (1986). Going through (L). In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Diversity and diachrony (pp. 173–198). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin-Mignault, H., & Six, G. (1990). Le Français au Québec [French in Quebec] (3rd ed.). Montréal: Sodilis.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, P. (2012). Writing it down: Issues relating to the use of restitution tasks in listening comprehension. TESOL Journal, 3, 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Verdugo, D. (2006). A study of intonation awareness and learning in non-native speakers of English. Language Awareness, 15, 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, G. (2007). Vowel deletion and resyllabification in French speech: A source of perceptual difficulty for American learners of French. Proceedings of the 2007 Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, London, UK. Retrieved from http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/ptlc/proceedings/ptlcpaper_26e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, E., Bourdages, J., & Champagne, C. (1988). Second language accent: The relationship between discrimination and perception in acquisition. Language Learning, 38, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stridfeldt, M. (2005). La perception du français oral par les apprenants suédois [Perception of spoken French by Swedish learners] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M.H. (2010). Teaching students how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinet, M. (2000). Pos/Neg polarity, -tu (pas) and yes/no questions. Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique, 28, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through peer online assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar