567
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fostering EF/SL learners’ meta-pragmatic awareness of complaints and their interactive effects

Pages 123-137 | Received 20 Mar 2013, Accepted 04 Dec 2014, Published online: 09 Apr 2015

References

  • Acuña Ferreira, V. (2002–2003). Gendered emotive displays in complaint discourse. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 3–4, 139–172.
  • Alcón Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33, 417–435.
  • Azarmi, A., & Behnam, B. (2012). The pragmatic knowledge of Iranian EFL learners in using face keeping strategies in reaction to complaints at two different levels. English Language Teaching, 5, 78–92.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K, Hartford, B.A.S., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M.J., & Reynolds, D.W. (1991). Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45, 4–15.
  • Boxer, D. (1993a). Complaints as positive strategies: What the learner needs to know. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 277–299.
  • Boxer, D. (1993b). Social distance and speech behaviour: The case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 103–105.
  • Boxer, D. (2010). Complaint: How to gripe and establish rapport. In A. Martínez Flor and E. Usó Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 163–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Boxer, D., & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 49, 44–58.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chen, Y.S., Chen, C.Y., & Chang, M.H. (2010). The effects of instruction on Chinese university students’ production of complaint behaviour in American English. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 7, 29–65.
  • Chen, Y.S., Chen, C.Y., & Chang, M.H. (2011). American and Chinese complaints: Strategy use from a cross-cultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 253–275.
  • Clennell, C. (1999). Promoting pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP classes. ELT Journal, 53, 83–91.
  • Cohen, A.D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2, 275–301.
  • Cohen, A.D. (2006). Interlanguage pragmatics: A reply to Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 359–364.
  • Dersley, I., & Wootton, A. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375–406.
  • Di Pietro, R.J. (1987). Strategic interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295–325.
  • Edmondson, W., & House, J. (1981). Let's talk and talk about it. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
  • Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5–29.
  • Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2004). Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints. English and Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14, 181–197.
  • Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2006). Interlanguage pragmatics: A response to Andrew Cohen's ‘Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts’ published in Vol. 2, No. 3, of Intercultural Pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 213–223.
  • Gershenson, O. (2003). Misunderstanding between Israelis and Soviet immigrants: Linguistic and cultural factors. Multilingua, 22, 275–290.
  • Günthner, S. (1997). Complaint stories. Constructing emotional reciprocity among women. In H. Kotthoff & R. Wodak (Eds.), Communicating gender in context (pp. 179–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Hartford, B., & Mahboob, A. (2004). Models of discourse in letter of complaint. World Englishes, 23, 585–600.
  • Ifantidou, E. (2011). Genres and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 327–346.
  • Ishihara, N. (2010a). Incorporating technology into pragmatics-focused instruction. In N. Ishihara & A.D. Cohen, Teaching and learning pragmatics. Where language and culture meet (pp. 244–263). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Ishihara, N. (2010b). Assessment of pragmatics in the classroom. In N. Ishihara & A.D. Cohen, Teaching and learning pragmatics. Where language and culture meet (pp. 286–317). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A.D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics. Where language and culture meet. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Jodłowiec, M. (2010). The role of relevance theory in SLA studies. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 49–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K.R. (Eds.). (1993). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K.R. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. In K.R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 1–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149–169.
  • Kondo, S. (2008). Effects of pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In E. Alcón Soler, & A. Martínez Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning (pp. 153–177). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Kunschak, C. (2000). Complaint strategies in Viennese German as presented in authentic texts for listening comprehension. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 38, 143–157.
  • Laforest, M. (2002). Scenes of family life: Complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1595–1620.
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
  • Maia de Paiva, B.M., & Foster-Cohen, S.H. (2004). Exploring the relationships between theories of second language acquisition and relevance theory. Second Language Learning, 20, 281–288.
  • Márquez-Reiter, R. (2005). Complaint calls to a caregiver service company: The case of desahogo. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2, 481–514.
  • Martínez Flor, A., & Usó Juan, E. (2006). A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning, 16, 39–64.
  • Murphy, B., & Neu, J. (1996). My grade's too low: The speech act set of complaining. In S.M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in second language (pp. 191–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Olshtain, E., & Weinbach, L. (1993). Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining. In S. Blum-Kulka & G. Kasper (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 108–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Padilla Cruz, M. (2010). Teaching interjections in the ESL/EFL class: A pragmatic approach. In L. Pérez Ruiz, I. Parrado Román, & P. Tabarés Pérez (Eds.), Estudios de metodología de la lengua inglesa, (Vol. 5, pp. 23–33). Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
  • Padilla Cruz, M. (2012). Metarepresentation, attitudinal utterances and attitude combination: A relevance-theoretic approach. In A. Piskorska (Ed.), Relevance studies in Poland. Volume 4: Essays on language and communication (pp. 75–88). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Padilla Cruz, M. (2013). An integrative proposal to teach the pragmatics of phatic communion in ESL classes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 131–160.
  • Rubino, A., & Bettoni, C. (2006). Handling complaints cross-culturally: Italians vs. Anglo-Australians. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 35, 339–358.
  • Safont Jordá, M.P. (2005). Third language learners. Pragmatic production and awareness. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schneider, K.P. (1988). Small talk. Analysing phatic discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.
  • Scollon, R., & Wong-Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication. A discourse approach. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay on the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sell, R.D. (1991). The politeness of literary texts. In R.D. Sell (Ed.), Literary pragmatics (pp. 208–224). London: Routledge.
  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness. London: Continuum.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997). Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Multilingua, 16, 145–151.
  • Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10, 393–417.
  • Tomlinson, B. (1994). Pragmatic awareness activities. Language Awareness, 3, 119–124.
  • Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics. Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Trosborg, A. (2003). The teaching of business English. In A. Martínez Flor, E. Usó Juan, & A. Fernández Guerra (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 247–281). Castellón de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
  • Trosborg, A., & Shaw, P. (1998). ‘Sorry does not pay my bills’. The handling of complaints in everyday interaction/cross-cultural business interaction. Hermes, Journal of Linguistics, 21, 67–94.
  • Tzanne, A., Ifantidou, E, & Mitsikopoulou, B. (2009). Raising and assessing pragmatic awareness in L2 academic language learning. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 297–309.
  • Wilson, D. (1999). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 127–161.
  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Žegarac, V., & Clark, B. (1999). Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 321–346.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.