Teaching email requests in the academic context: a focus on the role of corrective feedback

References

• Akikawa, K., & Ishihara, N. (2010). ‘Please write a recommendation letter’: Teaching to write e-mail requests to faculty. In D. Tatsuki & N. Houck (Eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching speech acts (pp. 47–66). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In M. de Pilar Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 221–241). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2010). Exploring the pragmatics of interlanguage pragmatics: Definition by design. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (pp. 219–260). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A. (2008) Contrasting requests in inner circle Englishes. A study in variational pragmatics. In M. Puetz & J. Neff van Aertselaer (Eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics: Interlanguage and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 355–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., & Nguyen, T.T.M. (in press). Teaching pragmatics. In A. Barron, G. Steen, & Y. Guo (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, L., & Cummings, M. (1985). Speech act performance: A function of the data collection procedure? Paper presented at the TESOL convention, 5–14 April, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2006). Making requests in e-mail: Do cyber-consultations entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J.C. Felix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 81–107). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing e-mails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12, 409–431. doi:10.1177/1362168808089924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realisation patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196–213. doi:10.1093/applin/5.3.196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 165–180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100006069
   Google Scholar
• Bonikowska, M. (1988). The choice of opting out. Applied Linguistics, 9, 169–181. doi:10.1093/applin/9.2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2001, February). Making e-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St. Louis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 461 299).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning and Technology, 10(2), 35–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). ‘Please answer me as soon as possible’: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, S. (2006). The use of pragmatics in e-mail requests made by second language learners of English. Studies in Language Sciences, 5, 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorn, K.J., Evans, N.W., Merrill, P.F., Sudweeks, R.R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N.J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 84–109. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.213781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, K. (2013). Investigating adolescent health communication. A corpus linguistics approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B. (2010). An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in emails in English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 221–255. doi:10.1515/iprg.2010.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, J. (2010). The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol. VII, pp. 363–387). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, N. (2010). Maintaining an optimal distance: Nonnative speakers’ pragmatic choice. In A. Mahboob (Ed.), Non-native speakers of English in TESOL: Identity, politics, and perceptions (pp. 35–53). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, E.H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, D., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2011). The effect of input-based practice on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. Language Learning, 62(2), 403–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). The effects of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In E. Alcon (Ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context (pp. 191–225). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/1473-4192.00035
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.T.M. (2008). Modifying L2 criticisms: How learners do it? Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 768–791. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.T.M. (2013). An exploratory study of criticism realization strategies used by NS and NNS of New Zealand English. Multilingua, 32(1), 103–130. doi:10.1515/multi-2013-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.T.M., & Ho, G.A.L. (2013). Requests and politeness in Vietnamese as a native language. Pragmatics, 23(4), 685–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T.T.M., & Ho, G.A.L. (2014). Acquisition of request modifiers in Vietnamese as a second language. Journal of Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 7, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.T.M., Pham, T.H., & Pham, M.T. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nipaspong, P., & S. Chinokul (2010). The role of prompts and explicit feedback in raising EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 101–146.
   Google Scholar
• Ogiermann, E. (2009). Politeness and indirectness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research, 5, 189–216. doi:10.1515/JPLR.2009.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röver, C. (2009). Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 560–577). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K., & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, K., & Ng, C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 145–170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 131–164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Safont, M.P. (2003). Instructional effects on the use of request acts modification devices by EFL learners. In A. Martínez-Flor, E. Usó, & A. Fernández (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 211–232). Castello: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, P.C., 2003. Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In A. Martínez-Flor, E. Usó, & A. Fernández (Eds.), Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–246). Castello: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W.M. Chan, S. Chi, K.N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J.W. Sew, T. Suthiwan, & I. Walker (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, 2–4 December, Singapore (pp. 721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–179. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011943
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2010). The role of corrective feedback in second language acquisition: An introduction to the special issue. Studies in Second language Acquisition, 32(2), 169–179. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ understanding and use of two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103–131. doi:10.1111/lang.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language acquisition. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 313–338. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2008). Cognition, language contact, and the development of pragmatic comprehension in a study-abroad context. Language Learning, 58, 33–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing interlanguage pragmatic competence. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2005). Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics. System, 3, 437–461. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2010). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 127–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10, 393–417. doi:10.1191/1362168806lr198oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2009). Exploring the effects of input-based treatment and test on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1029–1046. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2012). Meta-pragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, T.T.H. (1997). Politeness in modern Vietnamese. A sociolinguistic study of a Hanoi speech community (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T.T.H. (1999). Gian tiếp va lịch sự trong lời cầu khẩn tiếng Việt [Indirectness and politeness in Vietnamese requests]. Ngôn ngữ, 1(112), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 145–178. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodfield, H. (2008). Interlanguage requests: A contrastive study. In M. Puetz & J. Neff van Aertselaer (Eds.), Developing contrastive pragmatics: Interlanguage and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 231–264). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y. (2001). An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, field notes and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(2), 271–292. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar