The relationship between aptitude and working memory: an instructed SLA context

References

• Alptekin, C., Erçetin, G., & Özemir, O. (2014). Effects of variations in reading span task design on the relationship between working memory capacity and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 536–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). The modern languages aptitude test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2007). What do working memory span tasks like reading span really measure? In N. Osaka, R. H. Logie, & M. D'Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehn, M. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 509–544.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 395–406). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C. (2013). The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for L2 reading comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 727–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147–171.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. In G. Gisela & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate attainment (pp. 105–130). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language ability: The Canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 340–405.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, H., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, K. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in novice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012). The aptitude-treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules. System, 40, 505–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualization of aptitude. In G. Gisela & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate attainment (pp. 131–152). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., … Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistics studies on training and retention (339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2002a). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113–133). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2002b). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfield, and Hernstad (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–265). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2012). Individual differences, aptitude complexes, SLA processes and aptitude test development. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 57–76). Oxford: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (2009). The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning. Language Awareness, 18, 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2006). Corrective feedback, individual differences, and the acquisition of English articles by second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 188–221.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals language learning aptitude (pp. 119–154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, H., Dediu, D., Roberts, L., van Oort, E., Norris, D. G., & Hagoort, P. (2012). The structural connectivity underpinning language aptitude, working memory, and IQ in the perisylvian language network. Language Learning, 62, 110–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalçın, Ş. (2012). Individual differences and the learning of two grammatical features with Turkish learners of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Yalçın, Ş, & Spada, N. (in press). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2).
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, Y. (2001). The role of working memory in language aptitude. In X. Bonch- Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present, and future of second language research (pp.144–163). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar