Developing prospective teachers’ diagnostic skills through collaborative video analysis: focus on L2 reading

References

• Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81–95. doi:10.1080/09658410308667068.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133–150. doi:10.1017/S0267190505000073.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, B. M. (2007). English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, C. D., Vaughn, S., Clapper, A. T., & Kim, A.-H. (2002). Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving secondary students’ reading comprehension skills. Research to Practice Brief, 1(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (2004). Discussion. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education: Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 10, pp. 287–304). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2012). Collaborative peer video analysis: Insights about literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 171–199. doi:10.1177/1086296X12440429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, C. (2005). Interessen und Strategien beim fremdsprachlichen Lesen: Wie Schülerinnen und Schüler englische Texte lesen und verstehen [Interests and strategies in foreign language reading: How pupils read and comprehend English texts]. Tübingen: Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, C. (2006). EFL and ESL knowledgeable reading: A critical element for viable membership in global communities. Babylonia, (3–4), 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Finkbeiner, C., Knierim, M., Smasal, M., & Ludwig, P. H. (2012). Self-regulated cooperative EFL reading tasks: Students’ strategy use and teachers’ support. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision: KFT 4-12+R [Cognitive ability test for grades 4 to 12, revision: KFT 4-12+R]. Göttingen: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kultusministerkonferenz [KMK]. (2008/ 2017]). Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung. Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.10.2008 in der Fassung vom 16.03.2017. [Common content-related requirements for the scientific and didactic disciplines in teacher education in Germany. Issued by the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs on 16/10/2008, revised version 16/03/2017]. Retrieved from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2008/2008_10_16-Fachprofile-Lehrerbildung.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, P. H., Finkbeiner, C., & Knierim, M. (2013). Effects of the adequacy of learning strategies in self-regulated learning settings: A video-based microanalytical lab study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 374–390. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.374.
   Google Scholar
• MAXQDA 11 (2014). VERBI GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.maxqda.de/produkte/maxqda11
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Foundations and techniques] (11th rev. ed.). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mörtl-Hafizović, D. (2006). Chancen situierten Lernens in der Lehrerbildung: Theoretische Analyse und empirische Überprüfung. [Opportunities of situated learning in teacher education: Theoretical analysis and empirical validation] (Doctoral dissertation). University of Regensburg.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, G. (2003). DESI – A large assessment project in Germany and the pros and cons of large scale testing. Empirische Pädagogik, 17(3), 368–379.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches. Bilingual education & bilingualism (Vol. 70, pp. 125–160). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schluer, J. (2017). Lexical and conceptual awareness in L2 reading: An exploratory study. Language Culture Literacy: Vol. 7. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching. (Vol. 10, pp. 1–27). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2007). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching & Linguistics: Abstracts, 40(4), 287–308. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004491.
   Google Scholar
• Thornbury, S. (1997). About language: Tasks for teachers of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 5–28. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00078.x.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. K. (1999). Teaching reading comprehension through collaborative strategic reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(5), 284–292. doi:10.1177/105345129903400505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. R. (1993). Understanding and coping with cross-cultural adjustment stress. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (2nd ed., pp. 137–167). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E. (2000). Lehren und Lernen für die Zukunft – Ansprüche an das Lernen in der Schule [Teaching and learning for the future – Demands for learning at school]. Paper presented at the Pädagogisches Zentrum Bad Kreuznach, March 29th, 2000. Retrieved from http://www2.ibw.uni-heidelberg.de/∼gerstner/WeinertLehren&Lernen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D., & Fassnacht, C. (2012). Transana 2.51-Win. University of Wisconsin Systems. Retrieved from https://www.transana.com/
   Google Scholar