Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers

References

• Arndt, V. (1993). Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process. In M. N. Brock and L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching Composition Around the Pacific Rim: Politics and Pedagogy (pp. 90–116). UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C. E. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215–241.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. (1981). The structure of knowledge and the future of liberal education. Liberal Education, 181, 185.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Crinon, J., & Marin, B. (2010). The role of peer feedback in learning to write explanatory texts: Why the tutors learn the most. Language Awareness, 19(2), 111–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, N. (2010). Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38(1), 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, N. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16(4), 274–292.
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1974). Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanjani, A., & Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers’ collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance. System, 44, 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feed ack. System, 55, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. (2013). Scaffolding Young Learners in Language Learning. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett, J. (1968). Teaching the Universe of Discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G., & Carson, J. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113–131.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. Columbia, OH: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., Steendam, E., … Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observation of peers in learning to write: Practice and research. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 53–83.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.
   Google Scholar
• Tocalli-Beller, A., & Swain, M. (2005). Reformulation and the cognitive conflict it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 147–170.
   Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M. (2006). A comparison between teacher feedback and peer feedback during English writing classes in China. Modern Foreign Languages, 294–301.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing. Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellermayer, M. (1989). The study of teachers’ written feedback to students’ writing: Changes in theoretical considerations and the expansion of research contexts. Instructional Science, 18(2), 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 251–276.
   Google Scholar