Discourse and long-term effects of isolated and combined structured input and structured output on the acquisition of the English causative form

References

• Benati, A. (2001). A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 95–127. doi:10.1177/136216880100500202
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A. (2004a). The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 207–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A. (2004). The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness, 13(2), 67–80. doi:10.1080/09658410408667087
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A. (2005). The effects of PI, TI and MOI in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 67–113. doi:10.1191/1362168805lr154oa
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A. (2017). Classroom-oriented research: Processing Instruction. Language Teaching, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., & Batziou, M. (2019). The effects of structured-input and structured-output tasks on the acquisition of English causative. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57 (pages forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2010). Processing instruction and discourse. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2015). Processing Instruction: New insights after twenty years of theory, research and application. International Review of Applied Linguistics (Special Issue), 53(2).
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., Lee, J., & Hikima, N. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on discourse-level interpretation tasks with the Japanese passive construction. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Ed.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 148–177). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Benati, A., Lee, J., & McNulty, E. (2010). Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando. In A. Benati & J. F. Lee (Ed.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp. 97–147). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 179–193. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. C. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania, 85, 308–323.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. C. (2004). Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 119–141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A. (2001a). The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5, 57–94.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A. (2001b). Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania, 84(2), 289–299. doi:10.2307/3657760
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A. (2004a). The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 143–168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A. (2004b). Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A. (2005). Structured input: Grammar instruction for the acquisition-oriented classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, G., & Farley, A. (2008). Processing instruction, meaning-based output instruction, and meaning-based drills: Impacts on classroom L2 acquisition of Spanish object pronouns. Hispania, 19, 639–650.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. (2013). The effects of processing instruction with and without output: Acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive in three conjunctional phrases. Hispania, 96(1), 153–169. doi:10.1353/hpn.2013.0009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2004). On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 311–323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2009). Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2013). Individual differences and processing instruction. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Leeser, M. (Forthcoming). A research synthesis and meta-analysis of Processing Instruction.
   Google Scholar
• Kasprowicz, R., & Marsden, E. (2018). Towards ecological validity in research into input-based practice: Form spotting can be as beneficial as form-meaning practice. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 886–911. doi:10.1093/applin/amw051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56(3), 507–566. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00375.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, E., & Chen, H. Y. (2011). The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote. Language Learning, 61(4), 1058–1098. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00661.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2011). The effects of a combined output and input- oriented approach in teaching reported speech. Research in Language, 9, 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and W. R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 41–56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, C. (2004). Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00248.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2015). The effectiveness of processing instruction and production-based instruction on L2 grammar acquisition: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 306–325. doi:10.1093/applin/amu067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, P. D. (2006). Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56, 319–385. doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Patten, B. (2015a). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams, (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 113–135). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (2015b). Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53, 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. (2015). Key terms in second language acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. doi:10.1017/S0272263100011979
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., Farmer, J., & Clardy, C. (2009). Processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction: A response to Keating and Farley (2008). Hispania, 92, 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Fernández, C. (2004). The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 273–289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., Inclezan, D., Salazar, H., & Farley, A. P. (2009). Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on object pronouns and word order in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 557–575. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01033.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495–510. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015394
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F.R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction and the French causative: Another replication. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. (2004). The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar