1,146
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The construction of conflict talk across workplace contexts: (towards) a theory of conflictual compact

ORCID Icon &
Pages 186-206 | Received 13 Nov 2018, Accepted 14 Jun 2019, Published online: 03 Sep 2019

References

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. doi: 10.2307/259136
  • Angouri, J. (2012). Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1565–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010
  • Archer, D., & Jagodziński, P. (2015). Call centre interaction: A case of sanctioned face attack? Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 46–66. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.009
  • Ayoko, O. B. (2016). Workplace conflict and willingness to cooperate. International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(2), 172–198. doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-12-2014-0092
  • Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Choi, S., & Schnurr, S. (2014). Exploring distributed leadership: Solving disagreements and negotiating consensus in a “Leaderless” team. Discourse Studies, 16, 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1461445613508891
  • Codó, E. (2018). Language awareness in multilingual and multicultural organisations. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 467–481). London: Routledge.
  • Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (1990). Rules versus relationships in small claims disputes. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp. 178–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cook, G. (1990). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coulter, J. (1990). Elementary properties of argument sequences. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 181–203). Washington DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
  • Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
  • Culpeper, J. (2008). Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In D. Bousfeld & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice 
(pp. 17–44). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Donmall, G. (1992). Language Awareness. Wat is dat? Language Awareness, 1, 1–3.
  • Emmitt, S., & Gorse, C. (2003). Construction communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Firth, A. (Ed.) (1995). The discourse of negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace.
  • Fung, L. (2007). The communicative role of self-repetition in a specialised corpus of business 
discourse. Language Awareness, 16(3), 224–238. doi: 10.2167/la459.0
  • Greatbatch, D. (1992). On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 268–301). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gruber, H. (1996). Streitgespräche: Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform [Conflict talk: The Pragmatics of a Discourse Type]. Oladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Handford, M. (2014). Communication in the construction industry. In V. Bhatia & S. Bremner (Eds.),
 The Routledge handbook of professional discourse (pp. 363–381). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Handford, M., & Koester, A. (2010). “It’s not Rocket Science”: Metaphors and idioms in conflictual business meetings. Text & Talk – an Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1515/text.2010.002
  • Handford, M., & Matous, P. (2011). Lexicogrammar in the international construction industry: A corpus-based case study of Japanese – Hong-Kongese on-site. English for Specific Purposes, 30(2), 
87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2010.12.002
  • Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2016). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
  • Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Koester, A. (2010). Workplace discourse. London: Continuum.
  • Koester, A. (2017). Conflict talk. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 272–283). New York: Routledge.
  • Koller, V. (2018). Language awareness and language workers. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 4–20. 
doi: 10.1080/09658416.2017.1406491
  • Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, 22(2), 193–216. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017103
  • Lisboa, M., & Handford, M. (2012). Business advantage: Advanced level. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Locher, M., & Watts, R. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic 
behavior. In D. Bousfeld & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 77—99). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Marra, M. (2012). Disagreeing without being disagreeable: Negotiating workplace communities as an outsider. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1580–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.009
  • McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  • Mullany, L. (2008). “Stop hassling me!” Impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional workplace. In D. Bousfeld & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 232—251). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225–256. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  • O’Donnell, K. (1990). Difference and dominance: How labor and management talk conflict. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp. 210–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pounds, W. F. (1969). The process of problem finding. Industrial Management Review, 11, 1–19.
  • Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a 
creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55–77. doi: 10.1016/j.
leaqua.2003.12.005
  • Schnurr, S., Marra, M., & Holmes, J. (2007). Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Maōri and Pākehā leaders. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 712–729. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.016
  • Schnurr, S., Marra, M., & Holmes, J. (2008). Impoliteness as a means of contesting power relations in the workplace. In D. Bousfeld & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (pp. 211—229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Singy, P., & Guex, P. (1997). Scope and limits of medical discourse concerning AIDS prevention: Rationale and preliminary findings. Language Awareness, 6(4), 238–241. doi: 10.1080/09658416.1997.9959933
  • Svennevig, J. (2012). On being heard in emergency calls. The development of hostility in a fatal emergency call. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(11), 1393–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.001
  • Tsuchiya, K., & Handford, M. (2014). A corpus-driven analysis of repair in a professional ELF meeting: Not “letting it pass”. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 117–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.004
  • Vine, B. (2004). Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Vuchinich, S. (1990). The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wolfson, N. (1986). The bulge: A theory of speech behaviour and social distance. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 2(1), 55–83.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.