Police delivery of the opt-out procedure for children’s court evidence: evidence of inadequate language awareness

References

• Aldridge, M., & Wood, J. (1998). Interviewing children: A guide for child care and forensic practitioners. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. J. (2001). The language awareness of the L2 teacher: Its impact upon pedagogical practice. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 75–90. doi: 10.1080/09658410108667027
   Google Scholar
• Battin, D., Ceci, S., & Lust, B. (2012). Do children really mean what they say? The forensic implications of pre-schoolers’ linguistic referencing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 
167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, D., & Leng, R. (2000). Blackstone’s guide to the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. London: Blackstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, A., & Cooper, P. (2011). Still waiting for a meeting of minds: Child witnesses in the criminal and family justice systems. Criminal Law Review, 12, 925–942.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., Evans, R., & Sanders, A. (2007). Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 11(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (2003). Language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(1), 64–65. doi: 10.1093/elt/57.1.64
   Google Scholar
• Cots, J. (2013). Language awareness. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–7). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cots, J. M., & Garrett, P. (2018). Language awareness: Opening up the field of study. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2007). The use and abuse of special measures: Giving victims the choice? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8(Supp 1), 33–53. doi: 10.1080/
14043850701686139
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, B., Phelps, A., Turtle, J., & Sattar, G. (2004). Key findings from the survey of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses 2000/01 and 2003. Home Office research findings 240. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, M. (2014). Cultural identities in international, inter-organisational meetings: A corpus-
informed discourse analysis of indexical ‘we’. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2013.866123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2017). Children’s answering of yes-no questions: A review of 
research including particular consideration of the relational evaluation procedure. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 173–182. doi: 10.1037/bdb0000027
   Google Scholar
• Heffer, C. (2018). When voices fail to carry: Voice projection and the case of the ‘dumb’ jury. In J. H. C. Leung & A. Durant (Eds.), Meaning and power in the language of law (pp. 207–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2014). Achieving best evidence in child sexual abuse cases: A joint inspection. London: HMCPSI/HMIC.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office & Department of Health. (1992). The Memorandum of Good Practice (MOGP) on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (1999). Youth justice and criminal evidence act. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2002/2007/2011). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2009). Coroners and Justice Act 2009. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. B., Blum, R. W., & Giedd, J. N. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Martins, I. (1998). A satellite view of language: Some lessons from science classrooms. Language Awareness, 7 (2–3), 69–89. doi: 10.1080/09658419808667102
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2002). Is ongoing feedback necessary to maintain the quality of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children? Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35–41. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_04
   Google Scholar
• Landstrom, S., Granhag, P., & Hartwig, M. (2007). Children’s live and videotaped testimonies. How presentation mode affects observers, assessment and memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 333–347. doi: 10.1348/135532506X133607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Criminal Justice Reform. (2013). Code of practice for victims of crime. Ministry of Justice. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2009). Measuring up? Evaluating implementation of government commitments to young witnesses in criminal proceedings. NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Quas, J. A., Malloy, L. C., Melinder, A., Goodman, G. S., D’Mello, M., & Schaaf, J. (2007). Developmental differences in the effects of repeated interviews and interviewer bias on young children’s event memory and false reports. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 823–837. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, A., van Rheede, V., & Wilcock, R. (2015). Interviews, intermediaries and interventions: Mock 
jurors’, police officers’ and barristers’ perceptions of a child witness interview. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 7(1), 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Developing a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3), 242–258. doi: 10.1080/09658410903197264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. (1995). Introduction to language awareness. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language learning. Language Awareness, 7(2–3), 128–145. doi: 10.1080/09658419808667105
   Google Scholar
• Westcott, H., Kynan, S., & Few, C. (2006). Improving the quality of investigative interviews for suspected child abuse: A case study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1080/1068316050
0036988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar