The dialogical nature of language use in interactive listening: revisiting meaning in context

References

• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barbey, A., & Barsalou, L. (2009). Reasoning and problem solving: Models. In L. Squire (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 35–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bern, J. (2004). Listening comprehension strategies: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 521–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 113–131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness – Relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 5–13. doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.639887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy, B., & McCarthy, M. (2015). Co-constructed turn-taking. In A. Karen & R. Christoph (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 430–453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2010). Raising L2 listeners’ metacognitive awareness: A sociocultural theory perspective. Language Awareness, 19(4), 281–297. doi:10.1080/09658416.2010.519033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408–416. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, D. K., & Jones, E. (2012). Intercultural competence: An emerging focus in post-secondary education. In D. K. Deardoff, H. de Wit, & J. D. Heyl (Eds.), The sage handbook of international higher education (pp. 283–303). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family, N., Durus, N., & Ziegler, G. (2015). Grammar as a joint achievement: Co-constructions in L2 interactions. Novitas Royal Research on Youth and Language, 9(1), 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C., & Mallard, C. (2006). The use of reception strategies by learners of French as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 338–352. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2010). Listening in a second language. In A. D. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st century (pp. 158–177). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P., & Ohta, A. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430. doi:10.1093/applin/ami014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension. System, 28(1), 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213. doi:10.1177/0033688208092184
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. W. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255–274. doi:10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvet, B. E., & Wold, A. H. (2003). On the dialogical basis of meaning: Inquiries into Ragnar Rommetveit’s writings on language, thought, and communication. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 186–204. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1003_2
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. (2018). Second language learners’ metacognitive awareness in listening. Riga, Latvia: Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, A. (2015). An investigation into, and re-conceptualisation of, second language learners’ metacognitive awareness and activity in the listening process (Moray House PhD thesis collection). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2004). Collaborative turn sequences. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 225–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P., & Markovà, I. (1993). Acts in discourse: From monological speech acts to dialogical inter-acts. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23(2), 173–195. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1993.tb00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 3–19. doi:10.1017/S0267190500003457
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 193–210). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occuring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rehbein, J., ten Thije, J. D., & Verschik, A. (2012). Lingua receptiva (LaRa) - remarks on the quintessence of receptive multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(3), 248–264. doi:10.1177/1367006911426466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition (pp. 183–204). Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1990). On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Markovà & K. Foppa (Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1992). Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind (pp. 19–44). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 205–218. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2014). Listening in a multilingual world: The challenges of second language (L2) listening. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 131–148. doi:10.1080/10904018.2014.937895
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching: Listening (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability. Language Learning, 41(2), 235–273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2009). Learning, theories of learning, and units of analysis in research. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 202–208. doi:10.1080/00461520903029030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarvaglieri, C. (2017). Educational Landscaping’: A method for raising awareness about language and communication. Language Awareness, 26(4), 325–342. doi:10.1080/09658416.2017.1411358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216. doi:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1974). Opening up closings. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings (pp. 233–264). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, M. L. (2016). Language Awareness research: Where we are now. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 4–16. doi:10.1080/09658416.2015.1122027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. doi:10.2307/329959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494–505. doi:10.2307/328892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463–496. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004338
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390–416. doi:10.1111/lang.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York, NY: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (2002). The role of dialogue in activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(1), 43–66. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0901_04
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, D., Liu, Y., Lu, A., Lambert, A., Tomei, D., & Holden, D. (2018). An ecological community becoming: Language learning as first-order experiencing with place and mobile technologies. Linguistics and Education, 44, 45–57. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, D., Schmidt, M., Hu, Y., Liu, M., & Hsu, J. (2017). Eco-dialogical learning and translanguaging in open-ended 3D virtual learning environments: Where place, time, and objects matter. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 107–122. doi:10.14742/ajet.2909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar