A cross-cultural comparison in pedagogical beliefs about oral corrective feedback: the case of English language teachers in China versus the U.S.

References

• Atai, M. R., & Shafiee, Z. (2017). Pedagogical knowledge base underlying EFL teachers’ provision of oral corrective feedback in grammar instruction. Teacher Development, 21(4), 580–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1277257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2001). Border crossings: Towards a comparative pedagogy. Comparative Education, 37(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060120091292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, R. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes: Teachers’ beliefs versus their practices. System, 82, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814563200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilãns, G. (2016). Corrective feedback in L2 Latvian classrooms: Teacher perceptions versus the observed actualities of practice. Language Teaching, 20, 479–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(04), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027X
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and Interaction. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gas
   Google Scholar
• Gurzynski-Weiss, L. K. (2010). Factors influencing oral corrective feedback provision in the Spanish foreign language classroom: Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker status, SLA education, and teaching experience [PhD dissertation]. Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Anan, E. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience. System, 34(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. (2007). A comparative study of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations. CPRE Research Reports. https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/47.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring? Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Junqueira, L., & Kim, Y. J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between training, beliefs, and teachers’ corrective feedback practices: A case study of a novice and an experienced ESL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2–3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668828
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2017). Student and teacher beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji and E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 143–158). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback on system. System, 84, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focussed instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59(2), 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom Sla: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., ed. (2007). Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalingappa, L., Kayi-Aydar, H., & N. Polat. (2021). Conclusion. In N. Polat, L. Mahalingappa, & H. Kayi-Aydar (Eds.), Preparation of teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) around the world: Research, policy, curriculum, and practice (pp. 245–257). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, E. W. (2005). The influence of beliefs on the teaching practices of high school foreign language teachers Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, R. (2011). Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System, 39(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. eds. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Clearing up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, Z. (2015). Classroom discourse in college English teaching of China: A pedagogic or natural mode? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(7), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1015540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, N. (2010). A comparative analysis of pre-and in-service teacher beliefs about readiness and self-competency: Revisiting teacher education for ELLs. System, 38, 228–244.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, N., & Mahalingappa, L. (2013). Examining service and gender effects on teacher beliefs about ELLs in content area classes: A case for inclusion, responsibility and instructional support. Teaching Education, 24(1), 58–83.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, N., Zarecky-Hodge, A., & Schreiber, J. (2016). Academic growth trajectories of ELLs in NAEP data: The case of fourth- and eighth-grade ELLs and non-ELLs on mathematics and reading tests. The Journal of Educational Research, 109, 541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2015). Exploring non-native English-speaking teachers’ cognitions about corrective feedback in teaching English oral communication. System, 55, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarandi, H. (2016). Oral corrective feedback: A question of classification and application. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Storch, N. (2020). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 465–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehrinia, S., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2018). Oral corrective feedback: Teachers’ concerns and researchers’ orientation. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehrinia, S., Nemati, M., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2019). Studies on oral error correction: Do they provide counterevidence against nativist arguments? The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1298148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N., & Sato, M. (2020). Comparing the same task in ESL vs. EFL learning contexts: An activity theory perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnosfadrani, A. D., & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., & Harvey, J. (2010). Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, R. M. (2008). Applied statistics: From bivariate to multivariate techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2016). Learners’ oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency leave and types of error. System, 61, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective-feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.2167/la429.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. (2010). How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Wang, B., & Teo, T. (2018). understanding linguistic, individual and contextual factors in oral feedback research: A review of empirical studies in L2 classrooms. Educational Research Review, 24, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: A large-scale survey. Language Awareness, 28(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar