Comparing students’ responses to synchronous written corrective feedback during individual and collaborative writing tasks

References

• Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2014). A sociocultural perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of negotiated versus nonnegotiated feedback on the accuracy improvement in Writing. The Iranian EFL Journal, 11, 6–36.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar, F. S. (2017). Corrective feedback in written synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 17(2), 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(3), 417–435.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biari, R., & Jafari, S. (2013). The impact of collaborative writing on the writing fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 164–175.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A. (2019). Verbal reports in instructed SLA research. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 31–43). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, M. A., & Leow, R. P. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. (2011). Korean honorifics and politeness in second language learning. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, A., & Garcia, M. P. M. (2021). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N., & Weinmann, M. (2018). Written corrective feedback: The need for collaboration and multidirectional interaction. TESOL in Context, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2018vol27no1art770770
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Kim, Y. (2019). Learning Korean honorifics through individual and collaborative writing tasks and written corrective feedback. Applied Linguistics Review. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0075
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57–69). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, L. L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority and majority language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X
   Google Scholar
• Educational Linguistics, 12(1), 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y. (2014). Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-H. (2020). Willingness to engage: The importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness, 29(2), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1743712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Learning of Korean honorifics through collaborative tasks: comparing heritage and foreign language learners. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (eds.), Task based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 28–54). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 656–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2016). Learner-learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic task demands. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 41(3), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197–221). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. (1999). The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. In J. Gutierrez-Rexach & F. Martinez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics (pp. 60–71). Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2015). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K., & Fuentes, C. G. (2015). The effect of writing task and task conditions on Colombian EFL learners’ language use. TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i2.1208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Nguyen, T. A., & Pham, T. T. T. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1010543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Pham, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. A. (2018). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(3), 345–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Pham, T. T. T., & Nguyen, T. A. (2019). The effects of corrective feedback with and without revision on enhancing L2 pragmatic performance. Applied Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkhosh, M., & Najafi, S. (2020). Collaborative and individual writing: Effects on accuracy and fluency development. Porta Linguarum, 33, 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H.-F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, H. (2017). The theoretical interpretation of EFL teacher’s professional development from the perspective of sociocultural theory. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 7(11), 1059–1064.
   Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simard, D., Guénette, D., & Bergeron, A. (2015). L2 learners’ interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: Insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language Awareness, 24(3), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, J. (1989). Why Korean is difficult for English speakers to learn. Korean Language Education, 1, 75–113.
   Google Scholar
• Soleimani, M., Modirkhamene, S., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Peer-mediated vs. individual writing: Measuring fluency, complexity, and accuracy in writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1043915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting? TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2016). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 416–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34(4), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Vyatkina, N. (2010). The effectiveness of written corrective feedback in teaching beginning German. Foreign Language Annals, 43(4), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woll, N. (2018). Investigating dimensions of metalinguistic awareness: What think-aloud protocols revealed about the cognitive processes involved in positive transfer from L2 to L3. Language Awareness, 27(1-2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1432057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H.-C., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2010). Interlanguage pragmatics with a pedagogical agent: the request game. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar