EFL writers’ cognitive engagement with AWE feedback

References

• Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2017). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., Riordan, B., & McCaffrey, D. (2020). Expanding automated writing evaluation. In D. Yan, A. Rupp, & P. W. Foltz (Eds.), Handbook of automated scoring. Theory into practice (pp. 329–346). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-F E., & Cheng, W.-Y E. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes? Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 94–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. (2022). The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: From feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2082120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotos, E. (2014). Genre-based automated writing evaluation for L2 research writing: From design to evaluation and enhancement. Palgrave Mac Millan.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
   Google Scholar
• Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(1), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of grammarly in assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582
   Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology. 22(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Grotjahn, R., & Kleppin, K. (2017). Feedback zu schriftlichen Lernerproduktionen. In B. Akukwe, R. Grotjahn & S. Schipolowksi (Eds.), Schreibkompetenzen in der Fremdsprache: Aufgabengestaltung, kriterienorientierte Bewertung und Feedback (pp. 255–291). Narr Francke Attempto.
   Google Scholar
• Hegelheimer, V., Dursun, A., & Li, Z. (2016). Automated writing evaluation in language teaching: Theory, development, and application. CALICO Journal, 33(1), i–v. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.29251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockly, N. (2019). Automated writing evaluation. ELT Journal, 73(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing. Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2022). Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: Experiences of Chinese EFL student writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1329–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krings, H. P. (2020). Zur Einführung in den Themenschwerpunkt. Wo steht die Forschung und was folgt aus ihr für die Vermittlung fremdsprachlicher Schreibkompetenz? Fremdsprachen Lehren Und Lernen. Themenschwerpunkt Schreiben, 49(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, D., & Daniels, P. (2015). Grammar software ready for EFL writers? OnCue Journal, 9, 391–401.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2019). An AI-based English grammar checker vs. human raters in evaluating EFL learners’ writing. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22, 112–131.
   Google Scholar
• ProWritingAid, Teacher’s Manual (n.d.). Help your students become smarter writers. Retrieved from https://prowritingaid.com/en/Landing/Ebook/8
   Google Scholar
• Qian, G., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2022). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2312–2331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1879161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranalli, J., Link, S., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaofeng, L., & Saeed, R. (2019). The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. C. (Eds.). (2013). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2016). Language awareness. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 399–412). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2018). Researching language engagement: Current trends and future directions. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1406490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waer, H. (2023). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1914062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701771580
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr190oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigle, S. C. (2013). English as second language writing and automated essay evaluation. In M. D. Shermis & J. C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 36–54). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, D., Rupp, A., & Foltz, P. W. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of automated scoring: Theory into practice. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. (2018). English learning in the digital age: Agency, technology and context. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817–2842. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2016). Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study. ELT Journal, 71(3), ccw089. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. V. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Automated writing evaluation system. Tapping its potential for learner engagement. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(3), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2018.2866150
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar