Raising learner awareness of L2 writing spaces: supporting researchers, teachers, and learners through system mapping

References

• Abdel Latif, M. M. M. (2013). What do we mean by writing fluency and how can it be validly measured? Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803LR127OA
   Google Scholar
• ALA [Association for Language Awareness]. (n.d). About. http://www.languageawareness.org/?page_id=48 (accessed 15 February 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2021). Emergence of multiple groups of learners with different writing-development trajectories in classroom: Growth mixture modeling. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals—Handbook I, cognitive domain. David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cogntive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 189–216). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (1994). Language awareness as methodology: Implications for teachers and teacher training. Language Awareness, 3(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959844
   Google Scholar
• Bygate, M. (ed.) (2018). Learning through task repetition. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. P. (2011). Journal writing in second language education. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2283942
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Ren, W. (2022). Educating L2 learners about collaborative writing: Exploring the relationship between knowledge of collaborative writing and writing products. Language Awareness, 31(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1969403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A., & Tsang, A. (2022). Use and understanding of connectives: An embedded case study of ESL learners of different proficiency levels. Language Awareness, 31(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1871912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., & Aitken, G. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 116(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600407
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cumming, A. (1995). Fostering writing expertise in ESL composition instruction: Modeling and evaluation. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 375–397). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (2020). L2 writing and L2 learning: Transfer, self-regulation, and identities. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 29–48). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1996). Node-link mapping as an alternative to traditional writing ­assignments in undergraduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 23(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2302_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2015). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ell, F., Haigh, M., Cochran-Smith, M., Grudnoff, L., Ludlow, L., & Hill, M. F. (2017). Mapping a complex system: What influences teacher learning during initial teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2017.1309640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: From conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G. (2017). Developing concept-based instruction, pedagogical content knowledge: Implications for teacher educators and L2 instructors. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 4(1), 53–75. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/LST/article/view/614 https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.29542
   Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G. (2019). Tracking microgenetic changes in authorial voice development from a complexity theory perspective. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G. (2020). Unpacking ‘simplex systems’: Curricular thinking for L2 writing development. In G. G. Fogal & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 writing development (pp. 271–294). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.11fog
   Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G. (2022). System mapping simplex spaces: Facilitating change in L2 educational contexts from a complexity theory perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G. (2023). Educational landscapes through a complexity theory lens: Using system mapping to investigate L2 Shakespeare studies in secondary schools. International Journal of Complexity in Education, 4(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.26262/ijce.v4i1.9481
   Google Scholar
• Fogal, G. G., & Koyama, D. (2022). A study of co-adaptation through journaling. Journal of Second Language Writing, 55, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden, H. (1998). An aspect of holistic modeling in academic writing: Propositional clusters as a heuristic for thematic control. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90004-2
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (1999). Raising awareness of the generic structure and linguistic features of essay introductions. Language Awareness, 8(3-4), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419908667128
   Google Scholar
• Huck, G. J. (2015). What is good writing?. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huh, M. H., Lee, J., & Ha, H. S. (2018). EFL writing development through repetition of a literature-reading-writing task. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2018.12.34.4.53
   Google Scholar
• Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied Linguistics. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788925754
   Google Scholar
• James, C. & P. Garrett (eds.) (1991). Language awareness in the classroom. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2013). Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 63(s1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.x
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M., & Trochim, W. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983730
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, M. (2020). Education is a complex dynamical system: Challenges for research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1566199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P. L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2548–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludlow, L., Ell, F., Cochran-Smith, M., Newton, A., Trefcer, K., Klein, K., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Hill, M. F. (2017). Visualizing teacher education as a complex system: A nested simplex system approach. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 14(1), 36–79. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct26053
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, K., Arnett, C., & Labarca A. (Eds.) (2015). Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969212
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. (2016). Peer feedback practice in EFL tertiary writing classes. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p76
   Google Scholar
• Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2014). Task repetition and L2 writing development: A longitudinal study from a dynamic systems perspective. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights to and from writing (pp. 107–136). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34(4), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfenninger, S. E. (2020). The dynamic multicausality of age of first bilingual language exposure: Evidence from a longitudinal content and language integrated learning study with dense time serial measurements. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics, reading and science ­education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pintoi, A. J., & Zeitz, H. J. (1997). Concept mapping: A strategy for promoting meaningful learning in medical education. Medical Teacher, 19(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599709019363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, B. (2005). A ceiling effect in traditional classroom foreign language instruction: Data from Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, H. (2019). Dismantling the ivory tower in TESOL: A renewed call for teaching-informed research. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1-2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019). Do teachers care about research? The research-pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). The research-practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and future. The Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., Loewen, S., & Pastushenkov, D. (2021). ‘Who is my research for?’: Researcher perceptions of the research-practice relationship. Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 625–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A. M. (2007). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, K. (2004). Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice. Reflective Practice, 5(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000270655
   Google Scholar
• Torres, J. (2023). Heritage language learners’ written texts across pair types and interaction mode. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933184
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. (1995). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. (2021). Doing complexity research in the language classroom: A commentary. In R. J. Sampson, & R. S. Pinner (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on researching language learner and teacher psychology (pp. 269–283). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3267–3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, E. W., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., van Kemenade, A. M., Meijer, P. C., & Unsworth, S. (2022). Stimulating language awareness in the foreign language classroom: Exploring EFL teaching practices. The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1688857
   Google Scholar
• van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2014). The good, the bad and the ugly? The dynamic interplay between educational practice, policy and research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct22962
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Lowie, W. (2021). Understanding advanced level academic writing on syntactic complexity. In K. Hu, J. Kim, C. Zong, & E. Chersoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation (pp. 455–465). Association for Computational Lingustics. https://aclanthology.org/2021.paclic-1.48
   Google Scholar
• Wette, R. (2010). Evaluating student learning in a university-level EAP unit on writing using sources. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(3), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, E. (1994). Teaching and assessing writing. (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T., & Bolitho, R. (1993). Language awareness: A missing link in language teacher education? ELT Journal, 47(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.4.292
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. (2016). Languaging in story rewriting tasks by Chinese EFL students. Language Awareness, 25(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1197230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, H. C. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitoglu, N., & Reichelt, M. (2014). Using a genre-based approach for writing instruction in a less-­commonly-taught language. Language Awareness, 23(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.742906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar