What, if anything, will France's reintegration imply for the alliance debate on nuclear weapons?

References

• Anthony , I. 2009 . NATO and nuclear weapons . Politique étrangère , 4 : 159 – 171 .
   Google Scholar
• Biden , J. , 2010 . The path to nuclear security: implementing the President's Prague Agenda . Washington, DC, 18 February. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-vice-president-biden-national-defense-university [Accessed 1 March 2010] .
   Google Scholar
• Bozo , F. and Parmentier , G. 2007 . France and the United States: waiting for regime change . Survival , 49 ( 1 ) : 181 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn , M.E. , 2007 . Can deterrence be tailored? Strategic Forum 225 . Washington , DC : Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University 225 .
   Google Scholar
• Butcher , M. , 2009 . Obama's nuclear posture review: putting flesh on the bone of his nuclear diplomacy . BASIC Special Report, June, 14 p .
   Google Scholar
• Charillon , F. 2007 . La politique étrangère de la France: l'heure des choix . Politique étrangère , 1 : 139 – 150 .
   Google Scholar
• Chirac , J. , 2006 . La dissuasion nucléaire française. Speech at L'Ile Longue , 19 January. Available from: http://www.elysee.fr/elysee/francais/interventions/discours_et_declarations/2006/janvier/allocution_du_president_de_la_republique_lors_de_sa_visite_aux_forces_aeriennes_oceanique_et_strategiques-landivisiau-l_ile_longue-finistere.38406.html [Accessed 20 November 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Collina , T.Z. Kimball , D.G. , 2010 . Now more than ever: the case for the comprehensive test ban treaty . Washington , DC : Arms Control Association .
   Google Scholar
• Courmont , B. 2007 . Doctrine nucléaire française: questions en suspens . Revue internationale et stratégique , 1 ( 65 ) : 81 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Crawford , T.W. , 2009 . The endurance of extended deterrence: continuity, change, and complexity in theory and policy . In : T.V. Paul , P.M. Morgan J.J. Wirtz , Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age . Chicago , IL : The University of Chicago Press , 277 303 .
   Google Scholar
• David , D. 2008 . France/OTAN: la dernière marche . Politique étrangère , 2 : 429 – 441 .
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin , A. 2008 . La France et l'OTAN: vers la normalisation? . Courrier hebdomadaire , 2005 : 5 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Fortmann , M. and Haglund , D.G. 1999 . “ Hope or delusion? Canada and nuclear arms control ” . In Pondering NATO's nuclear options: gambits for a post-westphalian world , Edited by: Haglund , D.G. 125 – 149 . Kingston , ON : Queen's Quarterly .
   Google Scholar
• Guisnel , J. , Juppé , A. Rocard , M. , 2009 . En faveur d'un désarmement nucléaire mondial, y compris pour la France . Lepoint.fr , 14 October 2009. Available from: www.lepointéfr/actualites-monde [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Haglund , D. 2010 . Happy days are here again? France's reintegration into NATO and its impact on relations with the USA . European Security , 19 ( 1 ) : 123 – 142 .
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton , D. , et al. , 2009 . Alliance reborn: an Atlantic compact for the 21st century . Washington , DC : The Washington NATO Project Report .
   Google Scholar
• Heuser , B. , 1997 . NATO, Britain, France and the FRG: nuclear strategies and forces for Europe, 1949–2000 . New York : St. Martin's Press .
   Google Scholar
• von Hlatky , S. Fortmann , M. , 2010 . The nuclear question in today's Europe . In : F. Mérand , M. Foucault B. Irondelle , European security since the fall of the Berlin Wall . Toronto , ON : University of Toronto Press .
   Google Scholar
• IISS , 2009 . The military balance 2009 . London : International Institute for Strategic Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Kamp , K.-H. 1999 . The relevance of nuclear weapons in NATO . Defence & security analysis , 15 ( 3 ) : 293 – 304 .
   Google Scholar
• Kamp , K.-H. 2009a . “ NATO and 21st century deterrence ” . In NATO and 21st century deterrence , Edited by: Kamp , K.H. and Yost , D.S. Rome : NATO Defense College .
   Google Scholar
• Kamp , K.-H. , 2009b . The way to NATO's new strategic concept . NATO Research Paper 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Kern , S. , 2009 . France in NATO: why it matters . World Politics Review , 20 March .
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen , H.M. , Norris , R.S. Oelrich , I. , 2009 . From counterforce to minimal deterrence: a new nuclear policy on the path toward eliminating nuclear weapons . Occasional Paper 7, April .
   Google Scholar
• Larsen , J.A. , 2006 . The future of U.S. non-strategic nuclear weapons and implications for NATO: drifting toward the foreseeable future . Report prepared for the NATO Public Diplomacy Division, 31 October .
   Google Scholar
• Larsen , J.A. Klingenberger , K.J. , 2001 . Controlling non-strategic nuclear weapons: obstacles and opportunities . Colorado Springs , CO : USAF Institute for National Security Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Morgan , P.M. 2009a . “ Collective-actor deterrence ” . In Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age , Edited by: Paul , T.V. , Morgan , P.M. and Wirtz , J.J. Chicago , IL : The University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Morgan , P.M. 2009b . “ Evaluating tailored deterrence ” . In NATO and 21st century deterrence , Edited by: Kamp , K.H. and Yost , D.S. Rome : NATO Defense College .
   Google Scholar
• Norris , R.S. and Kristensen , H.M. 2008 . French nuclear forces, 2008 . Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , 64 ( 4 ) : 52 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nougayrède , N. , 2010 . Paris et Londres explorent une relance de leur coopération militaire . Le Monde , 23 March 18
   Google Scholar
• The North Atlantic Council , 1996 . Final communiqué issued at the Ministerial meeting of the North Atlantic Council . Brussels : NATO , 1996 . Available from: http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1996/p96-165e.htm [Accessed 10 February 2008] .
   Google Scholar
• The North Atlantic Treaty Organization , 1991 . The alliance's new strategic concept . Brussels: NATO, 1991. Available from: http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c911107a.htm [Accessed 10 February 2008] .
   Google Scholar
• The North Atlantic Treaty Organization , 1999 . The alliance's strategic concept . Brussels: NATO, 1999. Available from: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_27433.htm [Accessed 10 February 2008] .
   Google Scholar
• The Nuclear Threat Initiative , 2010 . Five NATO states want U.S. nukes out of Europe , Report says. 19 February 2010. Available from: http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20100219_2293.php [Accessed 1 March 2010] .
   Google Scholar
• Obama , B. , 2009 . Statement on France's return to NATO's military structure . Washington, DC, 21 March. Available from: http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-english/2009/March/20090323123717idybeekcm0.9732019.html [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Packard , G.R. 2010 . The United States–Japan security treaty at 50: still a grand bargain? . Foreign affairs , 89 ( 2 ) : 92 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul , T.V. , Morgan , P.M. Wirtz , J.J. , 2009 Complex deterrence: strategy in the global age . Chicago , IL : The University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pesme , F. , 2010 . France's ‘return’ to NATO: implications for its defence policy , European Security , 19 1 , 45 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Santoro , D. 2010 . The nuclear weapon states . The nonproliferation review , 17 ( 1 ) : 23 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Sarkozy , N. , 2008 . Cherbourg, 21 March. Available from: http://www.ambafrance-bg.org/spip.php?article1087 [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Sarkozy , N. , 2009 . Closing speech (Conference on France, European Defence and NATO in the twenty-first century). Paris, 11 March. Available from: http://www.ambafrance-uk.org/President-Sarkozy-on-France.html [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt , B. , 1997 . L'Europe de la dissuasion nucléaire [Nuclear Deterrence in Europe] . ISS Occasional Paper 3, October .
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais , B. 2007a . The last to disarm? The future of France's nuclear weapons . Nonproliferation review , 14 ( 2 ) : 264 – 267 .
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais , B. , 2007b . A comparison between US, UK, and French nuclear policies and doctrines . Paris : Sciences Po , CERI Working Paper. .
   Google Scholar
• Tertrais , B. , 2007c . Nuclear deterrence in 2030: a French perspective . Paris : Fondation pour la recherche stratégique .
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen , V.B. 2008 . France: Disarming or upgrading? . European security review , 41 : 7
   Google Scholar
• United Nations , 1968 . Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT) . New York. Available from: http://disarmament.un.org/wmd/npt/npttext.html [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• United Nations , 2009 . Security council resolution 1887 , 24 September. Available from: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/sc9746.doc.htm [Accessed 1 December 2009] .
   Google Scholar
• Vinçon , S. , et al. , 2006 . Dissuasion nucléaire française . Défense nationale et sécurité collective , 5 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Woolf , A.F. , 2004 . Nonstrategic nuclear weapons . CRS Report for Congress, FL32572, 9 September .
   Google Scholar
• Woolf , A.F. , 2008 . Nuclear weapons in U.S. National Security Policy: past, present, and prospects . Washington , DC : CRS Report for Congress .
   Google Scholar
• Woolf , A.F. , 2009 . Nonstrategic nuclear weapons . Washington , DC : CRS Report for Congress .
   Google Scholar
• Warden , J.K. , 2010 . Does Okada's letter opposing TLAM/N signal changes in Japanese Foreign Policy? CSIS , 26 January. Available on: http://csis.org/blog/does-okadas-letter-opposing-tlamn-signal-changes-japanese-foreign-policy [Accessed 1 March 2010] .
   Google Scholar
• Yost , D.S. 2005 . France's evolving nuclear strategy . Survival , 47 ( 3 ) : 117 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost , D.S. 2006 . France's new nuclear doctrine . International affairs , 82 ( 4 ) : 710 – 721 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost , D.S. , 2009 . NATO's deterrence challenges . Strategic insights , 8 4 .
   Google Scholar