References
- Active engagement, modern defence. Strategic concept for the defence and security of the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. 19 November 2010. Available from: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm [Accessed 15 November 2013].
- Adamkus, V., et al., 2009. An open letter to the Obama administration from central and eastern Europe. Gazeta Wyborcza [online], 15 July. Available from: http://wyborcza.pl/1,98817,6825987,An_Open_Letter_to_the_Obama_Administration_from_Central.html [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Arbatov, A., 2013. Strategic asymmetry and diplomacy. In: A. Arbatov, V. Dvorkin, eds. Missile defense: confrontation and cooperation. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center, 331–361.
- Arbatov, A. and Dvorkin, V., 2006. Beyond nuclear deterrence. Transforming the U.S.-Russian equation. Washington, DC: CEIP.
- Arbatov, A., Dvorkin, V., and Oznobishchev, S., eds., 2012. Russia and the dilemmas of nuclear disarmament. Moscow: IMEMO RAN.
- Arbman, G. and Thornton, Ch., 2003. Russia's tactical nuclear weapons. Part I: Background and policy issues. Stockholm: Swedish Defense Research Agency. Available from: http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/7912/1/thorntonrussia.pdf [Accessed 11 April 2014].
- Baker, P. and Myers, S.L., 2013. Ties fraying, Obama drops Putin meeting. The New York Times [online], 7 August. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/world/europe/obama-cancels-visit-to-putin-as-snowden-adds-to-tensions.html?src=mb [Accessed 14 August 2013].
- Berger, A., 2013. Playing it safe: the German election and tactical nuclear weapons. 18 January. Available from: http://turkeywonk.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/playing-it-safe-the-german-election-and-tactical-nuclear-weapons/ [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Blomfield, A., 2008. Vladimir Putin's nuclear threat to the West. The Telegraph [online], 15 February. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1578802/Vladimir-Putins-nuclear-threat-to-the-West.html [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Boese, W., 2008. Russia unflinching on CFE Treaty suspension. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2008_05/RussiaCFE [Accessed 8 January 2014].
- Bohlen, C., 2013. Bullied by Russia but resolute. The New York Times [online], 16 December. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/world/europe/bullied-by-russia-but-resolute.html?_r=0 [Accessed 14 January 2014].
- Braw, E., 2014. After Ukraine, countries that border Russia start thinking about nuclear deterrents. Newsweek [online], 15 April. Available from: http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/04/25/ukraine-countries-border-russia-start-thinking-nuclear.html [Accessed 16 April 2014].
- Chalmers, M., 2011. Back to the present: The NATO posture review and options for US nuclear weapons in Europe. In: If the bombs go. European perspectives on NATO's nuclear debate. London: RUSI, 1–10. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/IFTHEBOMBSGO.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2013].
- Chalmers, M., Chalmers, H., and Berger, A., 2012. A problem deferred? NATO's non-strategic nuclear weapons after Chicago. London: RUSI. Available from: https://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/Whitehall_Report_4-12.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2014].
- Chalmers, M. and Lunn, S., 2010. NATO's tactical nuclear dilemma. London: RUSI. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/NATOs_Nuclear_Dilemma.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2013].
- Chalmers, M. and Sommerville, A., eds., 2011. If the bombs go. European perspectives on NATO's nuclear debate. London: RUSI. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/IFTHEBOMBSGO.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2013].
- Chivers, C.J. and Herszenshorn, D.M., 2014. In Crimea, Russia showcases a rebooted army. The New York Times [online], 2 April. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/world/europe/crimea-offers-showcase-for-russias-rebooted-military.html?ref=world [Accessed 2 April 2014].
- Chung, M., 2013. US nuke umbrella not enough. The Korea Times [online], 19 February. Available from: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2013/08/120_130747.html [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Cirincione, J., Wolfsthal, J.B., and Rajkumar, M., 2002. Deadly arsenals. Tracking weapons of mass destruction. Washington, D.C.: CEIP.
- Cohen, S.T. and Van Cleave, W.R., 1976. Tactical nuclear weapons: doctrine, capabilities, and strategy. In: Toward a new defense for NATO: the case for tactical nuclear weapons, Agenda Paper No. 5. New York: National Strategy Information Center.
- Collina, T.Z., 2011. CFE Treaty talks stall. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: http://www.armscontrol.org/2011_09/CFE_Treaty_Talks_Stall [Accessed 8 January 2014].
- de Quetteville, H. and Pierce, A., 2008. Russia threatens nuclear attack on Poland over US missile shield deal. The Telegraph [online], 15 August. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/2566005/Russia-threatens-nuclear-attack-on-Poland-over-US-missile-shield-deal.html [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Dempsey, J., 2009. Ridding Germany of U.S. nuclear weapons. The New York Times [online], 28 October. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/world/europe/29iht-letter.html?_r=1& [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Deterrence and defence posture review, 20 May, 2012. Available from: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_87597.htm?mode=pressrelease [Accessed 15 November 2013].
- Donahue, P. and Czuczka, T., 2009. Merkel's government to seek withdrawal of U.S. nuclear weapons. Bloomberg, 24 October. Available from: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=akmBBLktmnro/ [Accessed 15 August 2013].
- Durkalec, J., 2012a. After the DDPR: central and eastern European perspectives. In: A problem deferred? NATO's non-strategic nuclear weapons after Chicago. London: RUSI, 45–54. Available from: https://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/Whitehall_Report_4-12.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2014].
- Durkalec, J., 2012b. NATO defence and deterrence posture: central and eastern European perspectives. Warsaw: PISM Policy Paper no. 29. Available from: http://www.pism.pl/Publications/PISM-Policy-Paper/No-29-NATO-Defence-and-Deterrence-Posture-Central-and-Eastern-European-Perspectives [Accessed 2 August 2013].
- Felgenhauer, P., 2013. Russia prepares for war with the US and NATO, while lacking resources. Eurasia Daily Monitor [online], 14 March, Vol. 10/Issue 48. Available from: http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=40592#.UkRBCaDnd8E [Accessed 24 September 2013].
- Foradori, P., ed., 2013. Tactical nuclear weapons and Euro-Atlantic security. The future of NATO. New York: Routledge.
- Forsyth Jr., J.W., Saltzman, B.Ch., and Schaub Jr., G., 2010. Remembrance of things past: the enduring value of nuclear weapons. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 4 (1), 75–89.
- Founding act on mutual relations, cooperation and security between NATO and the Russian federation. 27 May, 1997. Available from: http://www.nato-russia-council.info/media/59451/1997_nato_russia_founding_act.pdf [Accessed 7 January 2014].
- Freedman, L., 2003. The evolution of nuclear strategy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Friedberg, A.L., 2000. In the shadow of the Garrison state: America's anti-statism and its Cold War grand strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Friedberg, A.L., 2012. Bucking Beijing: an alternative U.S.-China policy. Foreign Affairs, 91 (5), 48–58.
- Gordon, M.R., 2014. NATO to firm up its presence in eastern Europe as it halts cooperation with Russia. The New York Times [online], 1 April. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/02/world/europe/nato-orders-end-to-practical-and-military-cooperation-with-russia.html?action=click&module=Search®ion=searchResults%230&version=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%3Faction%3Dclick%26contentCollection%3DEurope%26region%3DTopBar%26module%3DSearchSubmit%26pgtype%3Darticle%23%2FNATO [Accessed 2 April 2014].
- Gray, C.S., 2006. Another bloody century. Future warfare. London: Phoenix.
- Healey, D. 1989. The time of my life. London: Michael Joseph.
- Horowitz, L., 2013. Why do they want American Nukes? Central and Eastern European position regarding US nonstrategic nuclear weapons. European Security, 23 (1), 73–89.
- Russia not planning to phase out tactical nukes programs – Putin. 2012. Interfax [online], 24 February. Available from: http://www.interfax.co.uk/ukraine-news/russia-not-planning-to-phase-out-tactical-nukes-programs-putin-2/ [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Isachenkov, V., 2011. Russian military chief warns of nuclear war risks. Bloomberg Businessweek [online], 17 November. Available from: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9R2I9480.htm [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Johnson, J.D., 2010. The Iranian ballistic missile threat and a ‘Phased, adaptive approach’ to missile defense for Europe. Small Wars Journal [online]. Available from: http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/546-johnson.pdf [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Kamp, K.H., 2010. NATO's nuclear weapons in Europe: Beyond “Yes” or “No”. Research Paper No. 61 [online]. Rome: NATO Defense College. Available from: http://www.ndc.nato.int/research/series.php?icode=1 [Accessed 11 August 2013].
- Kibaroglu, M., 2011. NATO and US nuclear weapons: what would happen after the bombs have gone. In: If the bombs go. European perspectives on NATO's nuclear debate. London: RUSI, 41–49. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/IFTHEBOMBSGO.pdf [Accessed 11 January 2014].
- Kimball, D.G., 2011. U.S. suspends CFE Treaty implementation. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_12/US_Suspends_CFE_Treaty_Implementation [Accessed 8 January 2014].
- Knops, R., 2013. Letter to US Congress regarding B61 modernisation, presented to Mr Mike Turner, member of Congress by Raymond Knops, MP, Netherlands in Washington DC. 10 July, 2013. Available from: http://www.nonukes.nl/en/news/dutch-parliament-to-u.s.-house-of-representatives:-no-modernisation-of-nuclear-bombs-on-our-behalf [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Kramer, A.E., 2008. Czechs see oil flow fall and suspect Russian ire on missile system. The New York Times [online], 13 April. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/12/world/europe/12czech.html?scp=5&sq=Czechs%20dealing%20with%20Russian%20oil%20cutback&st=cse&_r=0 [Accessed 6 January 2014].
- Kristensen, H., 2012. Non-strategic nuclear weapons. Special Report N. 3 [online]. Washington: FAS, May 2012. Available from: http://www.fas.org/_docs/Non_Strategic_Nuclear_Weapons.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2013].
- Kristensen, H.M., 2013. (Still) Secret US nuclear weapons stockpile reduced. FAS Strategic Security Blog, 26 February. Available from: http://blogs.fas.org/security/2013/02/stockpilereduction/ [Accessed 14 August 2013].
- Kristensen, H. and Norris, R.S., 2014. The B61 family of nuclear bombs. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [online], 70. Available from: http://m.bos.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/16/0096340214531546.full.pdf [Accessed 23 April 2014].
- Kříž, Z. and Shevchuk, Z., 2011. Georgian readiness for NATO membership after Russian-Georgian armed conflict. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44 (1), 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.01.003
- Kulesa, Ł., 2010. Polish and central European priorities on NATO's future nuclear policy. Nuclear Policy Paper No. 2. Available from: http://tacticalnuclearweapons.ifsh.de/pdf/Nuclear_Policy_Paper_No2.pdf [Accessed 11 September 2013].
- Küçükkoşum, S., 2011. Moscow anxious on Turkey's shield role. Hürriyet Daily News [online], 28 July. Available from: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=moscow-anxious-on-turkey8217s-shield-role-2011-07-28 [Accessed 14 January 2014].
- Lambert, S.P. and Miller, D.A., 1996. U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe: the current environment and prospects for the future. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School. Available from: http://http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9126 [Accessed 8 April 2014].
- Larsen, J.A., 2006. The future of U.S. non-strategic nuclear weapons and implications for NATO. Drifting toward the foreseeable future. Available from: http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/05-06/larsen.pdf [Accessed 5 December 2013].
- Lee, Ch., 2013. S. Korea needs tactical nuke to send message to China: Rep. Chung. Yonhap News Agency, 9 April. Available from: http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2013/04/09/17/0301000000AEN20130409000900315F.HTML [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Lucas, E., et al., 2014. Central European security after Crimea: the case for strengthening NATO's eastern defenses. Report No. 35. Washington, D.C.: Center for European Policy Analysis. Available from: http://cepa.org/content/case-strengthening-natos-eastern-defenses [Accessed 9 April 2014].
- Lyulko, L., 2014. Russia is in dire need of military bases. Pravda.ru [online], 14 January. Available from: http://english.pravda.ru/russia/kremlin/14-01-2014/126592-military_bases-0/ [Accessed 15 January 2014].
- Military help for Georgia is a ‘declaration of war’, says Moscow in extraordinary warning to the West. 2008. Mail Online, 27 August. Available from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1049910/Military-help-Georgia-declaration-war-says-Moscow-extraordinary-warning-West.html [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Matettig, T., 2008. Tactical nuclear weapons in Germany: time for withdrawal? NTI, March 1. Available from: http://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/tactical-nuclear-weapons-germany/ [Accessed 15 August 2013].
- Meier, O., 2005. Belgium, Germany question U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005_06/Belgium_Germany_Tactical [Accessed 28 March 2014].
- Meier, O., 2009. German stance stirs debate. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_12/GermanNuclearStance [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Meier, O., and Lunn, S., 2014. Trapped: NATO, Russia, and the problem of tactical nuclear weapons. Arms Control Today [online]. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2014_01-02/Trapped-NATO-Russia-and-the-Problem-of-Tactical-Nuclear-Weapons [Accessed 22 April 2014].
- Nichols, T., Stuart, D., and McCausland, J.D., 2012. Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=145209 [Accessed 30 October 2013].
- Norman, L., 2013. NATO chief says Russia becoming more assertive, placed clear pressure on Ukraine. The Wall Street Journal [online], 19 December. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20131219-706010.html [Accessed 9 January 2014].
- Norris, R.S. and Kristensen, H., 2011. U.S. tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [online], 67 (1). Available from: http://bos.sagepub.com/content/67/1/64.full.pdf+html [Accessed 23 August 2013].
- Obama, B., 2013. Remarks by President Obama at the Brandenburg Gate, Berlin, Germany, 19 June, 2013. The White House [online]. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/06/19/remarks-president-obama-brandenburg-gate-berlin-germany [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Odom, W.E., 1998. The collapse of the Soviet military. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- O'Halloran, J.C., 2013. Iskander (SS-26 ‘Stone’/9M720/9M723 Tender). IHS Jane's weapons: strategic 2013–2014. Coulsdon, UK: IHS Global Limited, 65–67.
- Osgood, R.E., 1962. NATO: the entangling alliance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Oswald, R., 2012. NATO should use summit to address U.S. tactical nukes in Europe, experts say. NTI, May 11. Available from: http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/nato-should-use-summit-address-us-tactical-nukes-europe-experts-say/ [Accessed 25 March 2014].
- Oswald, R., 2014. U.S. tactical nuclear arms mission could shift among NATO jets. NTI, March 26. Available from: http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/aircraft-could-be-given-nato-tactical-nuclear-arms-mission/ [Accessed 27 March 2014].
- Payne, K., et al., 2013. Minimum deterrence: examining the evidence. Fairfax: National Institute Press.
- Perkovich, G., Chalmers, M., Pifer, S., Schulte, P., Tandler, J., 2012. Looking beyond the Chicago summit. Nuclear weapons in Europe and the future of NATO. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/beyond_chicago_summit.pdf [Accessed 11 April 2014].
- Perry, W., et al., 2009. America's strategic posture: the final report of the Congressional Commission on the strategic posture of the United States. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press. Available from: http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/America%27s_Strategic_Posture_Auth_Ed.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2013].
- Podvig, P., 2012. Russia's “sectoral defense” in Europe. Available from: http://russianforces.org/blog/2012/05/russias_sectoral_defense.shtml [Accessed 21 December 2013].
- Pomper, M.A., Potter, W., and Sokov, N., 2009. Reducing and regulating tactical (nonstrategic) nuclear weapons in Europe. Monterey: The James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Available from: http://cns.miis.edu/opapers/pdfs/tnw_europe.pdf [Accessed 2 April 2014].
- Reynolds, R., 2013. Navy shadows Russian warship off Moray coast. The Scotsman [online], 22 December. Available from: http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/navy-shadows-russian-warship-off-moray-coast-1-3242089 [Accessed 23 December 2013].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2013. Russia confirms tactical missile deployment on NATO borders. 16 December. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20131216/185614387/Russia-Confirms-Tactical-Missile-Deployment-on-NATO-Borders.html [Accessed 17 December 2013].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2010. Moscow irked by U.S. missile shield plans for Romania. 5 February. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/russia/20100205/157785564.html [Accessed 7 January 2014].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2013. Putin says no Iskanders deployed in Kaliningrad. 19 December. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/military_news/20131219/185723285/Putin-Says-No-Iskanders-Deployed-in-Kaliningrad.html [Accessed 21 December 2013].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2012. Russia does not rule out preemptive missile defense strike. 3 May. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/world/20120503/173188049.html/ [Accessed 14 August 2013].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2013. Russian military to decide on missile deployment at NATO borders. 20 December. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/world/20131220/185780974/Russian-Military-to-Decide-on-Missile-Deployment-at-NATO-Borders.html [Accessed 27 December 2013].
- RIA Novosti [online], 2008. Russia says Georgia's entry to NATO could lead to war. 8 December. Available from: http://en.ria.ru/world/20111208/169485481.html [Accessed 13 September 2013].
- Rose, J.P., 1980. The evolution of U.S. army nuclear doctrine, 1945–1980. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Ross, R.S., 2012. The problem with the pivot: Obama's new Asia policy is unnecessary and counterproductive. Foreign Affairs, 91 (6), 70–82.
- Roth, A., 2013. Deployment of missiles is confirmed by Russia. The New York Times [online], 16 December. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/world/europe/russia-deploys-missiles-in-western-region.html?ref=world&_r=0 [Accessed 17 December 2013].
- Rühle, M., 2013. The broader context of NATO's nuclear policy and posture. Research Paper No. 89 [online]. Rome: NATO Defense College. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=159446 [Accessed 18 April 2014].
- Schmidt, H. and Nunn, S., 2012. The world without nukes. The New York Times [online], 13 April. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/14/opinion/toward-a-world-without-nukes.html?_r=2& [Accessed 15 August 2013].
- Schneider, M., 2006. The nuclear forces and doctrine of the Russian federation. Fairfax, VA: National Institute Press, 2006. Available from: http://www.nipp.org/National%20Institute%20Press/Current%20Publications/PDF/Russian%20nuclear%20doctrine%20--%20NSF%20for%20print.pdf [Accessed 16 August 2013].
- Smith, J.M., 2012. Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO: arms control as an option. In: Tactical nuclear weapons and NATO. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 403–409. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=145209 [Accessed 31 October 2013].
- Smoke, R., 1977. War: controlling escalation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Snyder, G.H., 1961. Deterrence and defense: toward a theory of national security. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Sokov, N., 2009. The evolving role of nuclear weapons in Russia's security policy. In: Hansell, C, Potter, W., eds. Engaging China and Russia on nucleardisarmament. Monterey: Monterey Institute of International Studies, 73–88. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?ots591=0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233&lng=en&id=98859 [Accessed 25 March 2014].
- Sokov, N., 2010. The new, 2010 Russian military doctrine: the nuclear angle. Available from: http://cns.miis.edu/stories/100205_russian_nuclear_doctrine.htm [Accessed 16 August 2013].
- Sokov, N., 2014. Why Russia calls a limited nuclear strike “de-escalation”. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [online], 70 (1). Available from: http://thebulletin.org/why-russia-calls-limited-nuclear-strike-de-escalation [Accessed 15 March 2014].
- Solms-Laubach, F., 2013. Putin stationiert Raketen für Atomsprengköpfe. Bild [online], 15 December. Available from: http://wap.bild.de/politik/ausland/nuklearwaffe/putin-stationiert-raketen-fuer-atomsprengkoepfe-nahe-polnischer-grenze-33848846.bild.html [Accessed 16 December 2013].
- Sutyagin, I., 2012. The Russian perspective on NSNW. In: A problem deferred? NATO's non-strategic nuclear weapons after Chicago. London: RUSI, 55–68. Available from: https://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/Whitehall_Report_4-12.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2014].
- Sweetman, B. 2013. Russia develops multiple nuclear systems. Aviation Week and Space Technology. 11 November. Available from: http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_11_11_2013_p48-632594.xml [Accessed 11 November 2013].
- Tertrais, B., 1999. Nuclear policies in Europe. Adelphi Paper 327. London: IISS.
- Tertrais, B., 2011. The sky would not fall, but it might get a little darker: a French perspective. In: If the bombs go. European perspectives on NATO's nuclear debate. London: RUSI, 11–20. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/IFTHEBOMBSGO.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2013].
- Tertrais, B., 2012. Beyond US nuclear weapons? NATO and strategic deterrence by 2020. In: A problem deferred? NATO's non-strategic nuclear weapons after Chicago. London: RUSI, 15–26. Available from: https://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/Whitehall_Report_4-12.pdf [Accessed 7 April 2014].
- Thayer, B.A., Skypek, T.M., 2008. Russia Goes Ballistic. The National Interest, 97, 61–68.
- The Baltic Times, 2009. Latvija in brief. 11 November. Available from: http://www.baltictimes.com/news/articles/23854/ [Accessed 14 August 2013].
- The Guardian [online], 2011. US concerned over China's rapid development of new weapons. 9 January. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jan/09/china-us-gates-new-weapons [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation, 5 February, 2010. Available from: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/2010russia_military_doctrine.pdf [Accessed 16 August 2013].
- Thomas, J., 2014. How to put military pressure on Russia. The Wall Street Journal [online], 9 March. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303824204579421660993452026 [Accessed 10 March 2014].
- Turkowski, A., 2013. The role of tactical nuclear weapons in Russia's military posture. PISM Bulletin [online], Warsaw, 7 February. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=159760 [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- U.S. commitment to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, 1997. Available from: http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/npt/docs/commnpt.htm [Accessed 31 July 2013].
- United States Department of Defense, 2010. Increasing transparency in the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile. Fact Sheet. 3 May 2010. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/npr/docs/10-05-03_Fact_Sheet_US_Nuclear_Transparency__FINAL_w_Date.pdf [Accessed 2 August 2013].
- Valasek, T., 2011. Central Europe and NATO's nuclear deterrent. In: If the bombs go. European perspectives on NATO's nuclear debate. London: RUSI, 21–28. Available from: http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/IFTHEBOMBSGO.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2013].
- Van Cleave, W.R., Cohen, S.T., 1978. Tactical nuclear weapons: an examination of the issues. New York: Crane Russak.
- VOA News [online], 2012. Russia will not renew arms deal with US. 11 October. Available from: http://www.voanews.com/content/russia-will-not-renew-arms-deal-with-us/1524894.html [Accessed 24 October 2013].
- Waterfield, B., 2013. 22 ‘pointless’ US nuclear bombs at Dutch airbase. The Telegraph [online], 10 June. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/10110527/22-pointless-US-nuclear-bombs-at-Dutch-airbase.html [Accessed 12 September 2013].
- Yost, D.S., 2009. Assurance and US extended deterrence in NATO. International Affairs, 85 (4), 755–780. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00826.x
- Yost, D., 2011a. Adapting NATo's deterrence posture: the Alliance's new strategic concept and implications for nuclear policy, non-proliferation, arms control, and disarmament: a report on a workshop in Tallinn, 4–6 May 2011. NATO Defense College. Available from: http://www.ndc.nato.int/news/current_news.php?icode=299 [Accessed 24 March 2014].
- Yost, D.S., 2011b. The US debate on NATO nuclear deterrence. International Affairs, 87 (6), 1401–1438. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01043.x
- Yost, D., 2012. NATO's deterrence and defense posture after the Chicago summit. Monterey: U.S. Naval Postgraduate School Center on Contemporary Conflict. Available from: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=158725 [Accessed 11 April 2014].