Mapping out the institutional geography of external security in the EU

References

• Avery, Graham, 2011. The EU’s external action service: new actor on the scene. EPC Issue Paper. Available from: http://www.epc.eu/pub_details?cat_id=4&pub_id=1223 [Accessed 11 November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Blankart, Charles Beat and Mueller, Dennis C., 2004. A constitution for the European Union. Cambridge MA, London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brattberg, Erik, Rhinard, Mark, and Wennerholm, Peter, 2010. The EU as a counter-terrorism actor abroad: finding opportunities, overcoming constraints. EPC Issue Paper no. 60. Available from: http://www.epc.eu/pub_details?cat_id=2&pub_id=1152 [Accessed 14 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Busuioc, Elena Madalina, 2013. European agencies: law and practices of accountability. Oxford Studies in European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, 1997. Rethinking security after the cold war. Cooperation and conflict, 32 (1), 5–28.10.1177/0010836797032001001
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Thomas, 2001. Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: towards coherent governance? Journal of European public policy, 8 (5), 747–769.10.1080/13501760110083491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COREPER, 2008. Document 14431/1/08 REV 1 JAI 546 RELEX 772.
   Google Scholar
• COREPER, 2009. Decision of 17 December 2009. 17653/09 POLGEN 239 JAI 931 COMIX 979.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2008. Press Release, 2914th Council meeting General Affairs and External Relations General Affairs Brussels, 8 December 2008 16862/08 (Presse 359).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2009. Council Decision 2009/935/JHA of 30 November 2009, determining the list of third States and organisations with which Europol shall conclude agreements.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2010. Council Decision of 26 July 2010, Establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service, 2010/427/EU.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2011. Council Conclusions on integration of Maritime Surveillance Towards the integration of maritime surveillance: a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain, 3092nd General Affairs Council meeting Brussels, 23 May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cremona, Marise, and Hillion, Christophe, 2006. L'Union fait la force? Potential and limitations of the European neighbourhood policy as an integrated EU foreign and security policy. Working Paper. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute. Available from: http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/6419 [Accessed 6 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deidre, 1993. The constitutional structure of the union: a Europe of bits and pieces. Common market law review, 30, 17–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, Simon, 1999. Consistency as an issue in EU external activities. EIPA Working Paper 99/W/06. Available from: http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/product/20070816131419_99w06.pdf [Accessed 6 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Duke, Simon, 2006. Areas of grey: tensions in EU external relations competences. EIPASCOPE 2006/1, pp. 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, Simon, 2011. A difficult birth: The early days of the European External Action Service. CLEER Working Paper 2011/3. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2006. Communication from the Commission to the European Council of June 2006 Europe in the World – Some Practical Proposals for Greater Coherence, Effectiveness and Visibility. COM (2006) 278 final, Brussels., 8 June 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2001. Communication of the Commission, Brussels, 25 July 2001. European governance – a white paper. COM (2001) 428 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission-High Representative, 2011. Joint staff working paper, Strengthening ties between CSDP and FSJ actors. Proposal for a way ahead. Brussels, 5 May 2011, SEC (2011) 560 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2001. Declaration on the contribution of the CFSP. Annex V of the Presidency Conclusions, 21 September.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2003. A secure Europe in a better world – European security strategy. Brussels, 12 December 2003.
   Google Scholar
• European Council of Tampere, 1999. Conclusions of the presidency. Tampere, 15–16 October 1999.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2007. Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006/2200(INI)), Brussels, 30 January 2007.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2011. Regulation (EU) No 1168/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 establishing a European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Pereira, Laura C. and Martins, Bruno Oliveira, 2012. The external dimension of the European Union’s counter-terrorism: an introduction to empirical and theoretical developments. European security, 21 (4), 459–473.10.1080/09662839.2012.700639
   Google Scholar
• Fierke, K., 2007. Critical Approaches to International Security. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, Melanie, 2012. Frontex working arrangements: legitimacy and human rights concerns regarding ‘technical relationships’. Merkourios, 28 (75), 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, Andrew, 2015. Governing migration from a distance: interactions between climate,migration and security in the South Mediterranean. European Security, 24 (3), 473–490. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1028191
   Google Scholar
• Guild, Elspeth, et al., 2011. Implementation of the EU charter of fundamental rights and its impact on EU home affairs agencies (Frontex, Europol and the European Asylum Support Office). LIBE Committee, European Parliament. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/it/libe/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=48349 [Accessed 12 November 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Häge, Frank M., 2012. Bureaucrats as law-makers: committee decision-making in the EU council of ministers. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, Niklas, Ivan, Paul, and Konstanyan, Hrant, 2013. The new EU foreign policy architecture: reviewing the first two years of the EEAS | the centre for European policy studies. EU Foreign Policy, CEPS Paperbacks. Available from: http://www.ceps.eu/book/new-eu-foreign-policy-architecture-reviewing-first-two-years-eeas [Accessed 6 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hillion, Christophe, 2008. Tous pour un, un pour tous! Coherence in EU external relations law. In: Marise Cremona, ed. Developments in EU external relations law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Herwig, and Türk, Alexander, 2006. EU administrative governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stéphanie C, 2011. Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European security architecture. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 49 (1), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Katrin, 2015. The European Parliament as an actor in the field of EU border policies: Its role, relations with the other EU institutions and impact. European Security, 24 (3), 420–437. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1028188
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, Christian, and Léonard, Sarah, 2013. European security governance neighbourhood after the Lisbon Treaty. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Daniel, 2008. The absent friend: EU foreign policy and counter-terrorism. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 46 (1), 125–146.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, 2004. EU external governance in ‘Wider Europe’. Journal of European public policy, 11 (4), 680–700.10.1080/1350176042000248098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, 2010. Justice and home affairs: communitarization with hesitation. In: Wallace, Helen, Pollack, A. Marck, and Young, Alasdair, eds. Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 457–480.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, and Wichmann, Nicole, 2009. The external governance of EU internal security. Journal of European integration, 31 (1), 83–102.10.1080/07036330802503932
   Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico, 1997. Independent agencies and the delegation problem: theoretical and normative dimensions. In: Bernard Steunenberg and Frans van Vught, eds. Political institutions and public policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, Alexander, 2010. The CSDP mission planning process of the European Union: innovations and shortfalls. European integration online papers (EIoP), 14 (1). Available from: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2010-009.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Missiroli, Antonio, 2013. Guest editorial, in Europe’s defence. European foreign affairs review, 18 (3), 303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Mounier, Gregory, 2009. Civilian crisis management and the external dimension of JHA: inceptive, functional and institutional similarities. Journal of European integration, 31 (1), 45–64.10.1080/07036330802503874
   Google Scholar
• Neuwahl, Nanette, 1994. Foreign and security policy and the implementation of the requirement of ‘consistency’ under the treaty on European Union. In: D. O’Keeffe and P. Twomey, eds. Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty. Chichester: Chancery Wiley. 227.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, Simon, 2005. Coherence and consistency. In: Christopher Hill and Michael Smith, eds. The European Union and international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, Maria, 2015. Security cooperation, counter-terrorism and EU – North Africa cross border security relations, a legal perspective. European Security, 24 (3), 438–453. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1028189
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 2013. Report of the committee on migration, refugees and displaced persons: Frontex: human rights responsibilities. Strasbourg. Doc. 13161.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Patryk, 2009. The external dimension of the area of freedom, security and justice: hijacker or hostage of cross‐pillarization? Journal of European integration, 31 (1), 25–44.10.1080/07036330802503825
   Google Scholar
• Peers, Steve, 2013. EU rules on maritime rescue: member states quibble while migrants drown. Statewatch analysis, October 22. Available from: http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-243-eu-search-and-rescue.pdf [Accessed 4 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Perkowski, Nina. 2012. A normative assessment of the aims and practices of the European border management agency Frontex. Refugee Studies Centre, Oxford Department of International Development University of Oxford. Working Paper Series N. 81, April.
   Google Scholar
• Rijpma, Jorrit and Vermeulen Mathias, 2015. EUROSUR: Saving lives or building borders?. European Security, 24 (3), 454–472. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1028190
   Google Scholar
• Rothchild, E., 1995. What is security? Daedalus, 124 (3), 53–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, U., 1998. The concept of coherence in the Amsterdam treaty-bridging the union’s dual external policy structure. European foreign affairs review, 3, 421.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Tobias, 2015. Uncertainty at the EU's borders: narratives of EU external relations in the revised European Neighborhood Policy towards the southern borderlands. European Security, 24 (3), 381–401. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1028186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Andy, 2003. Why European Commissioners Matter. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (1), 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Karen E., 2005a. The outsiders: the European neighbourhood policy. International affairs, 81 (4), 757–773.10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve, 2005b. The Contested Concept of Security. In: Ken Booth, ed. Critical Security Studies and World Politics. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner, 27–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tietje, Christian, 1997. The concept of coherence in the Treaty on European Union and the common foreign and security policy. European foreign affairs review, 2 (1), 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, Jarle, 2006. Governing at the frontier of the European Commission: the case of seconded national officials. West European politics, 29 (1), 147–160.10.1080/01402380500389364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoonacker, Sophie, Dijkstra, Hylke, and Maurer, Heidi, 2010. Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy: the state of the art. European integration online papers (EIoP), 14 (1). Available from: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2010-004.pdf [Accessed 25 March 2015].
   Google Scholar