The European Parliament as an actor in EU border policies: its role, relations with other EU institutions, and impact

References

• Acosta Arcarazo, D., 2012. The good, the bad and the ugly in EU migration law: is the European parliament becoming bad and ugly? (The adoption of Directive 2008/115: the returns directive). In: E. Guild and P.E. Minderhoud, eds. The first decade of EU migration and asylum law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 179–205.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E.R., 2008. Digital borders and real rights: effective remedies for third-country nationals in the Schengen Information System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., and Guild, E., 2012. Does the Stockholm Programme matter? The struggles over ownership of AFSJ Multiannual Programming. CEPS paper in Liberty and Security in Europe Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., Hernanz, N., and Parkin, J., 2013. The ‘Lisbonisation’ of the European parliament – assessing progress, shortcomings and challenges for democratic accountability in the area of freedom, security and justice. Study for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs of the European Parliament. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/493012/IPOL-LIBE_ET(2013)493012_EN.pdf [Accessed 30 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, M., 2004a. Working document on the proposal for a council regulation establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders: the Commission’s proposal. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dt/548/548008/548008en.pdf [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, M., 2004b. Working document on the proposal for a council regulation establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders: The commission proposal: internal borders; political objectives and guiding principles; work programme. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dt/550/550857/550857en.pdf [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Cashman, M., 2005. Draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/pr/558/558830/558830en.pdf [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., 2013. Explanatory statement. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-215&language=EN#title3 [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, L., 1999. L’intégration de Schengen dans 1’Union européenne: problèmes et perspectives. Revue du Marche commun et de l’Union européenne, 428, 342–349.
   Google Scholar
• Council, 2004. 2004/927/EC: Council Decision of 22 December 2004 providing for certain areas covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community to be governed by the procedure laid down in Article 251 of that Treaty. OJ L 396, 45–46.
   Google Scholar
• Council, 2013. Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis and repealing the decision of the executive committee of 16 September 1998 setting up a Standing Committee on the evaluation and implementation of Schengen. OJ L 295, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• De Capitani, E., 2010. The evolving role of the European parliament in the AFSJ. In: J. Monar, eds. The institutional dimension of the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice. College of Europe studies 2010. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang, 11, 113–144.
   Google Scholar
• De Capitani, E., 2012. Da “Schengenland” allo “Spazio europeo di libertà, sicurezza egiustizia” [From “the Schengen area” to the “Area of freedom, security and justice”]. In: S. Alfano and A. Varrica, eds. Per un contrasto europeo al crimine organizzato e alle mafie – La risoluzione del Parlamento Europeo e l’impegno dell’Unione Europea [Towards a European policy against organized crime and the mafia – The resolution of the European Parliament and the commitment of the European Union]. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv, 2012. MEPs block draft laws to protest Schengen reform, 15 June 2012 [online]. Available from: http://www.euractiv.com/justice/bodskov-sad-parliament-boycott-news-513317 [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2004. Proposal for a council regulation establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders, COM (2004) 391.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union, COM (2013) 197.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council, 2006. Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), OJ L 105, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2010. Resolution of 5 May 2010 with observations forming an integral part of its Decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2008, Section III – Commission and executive agencies (SEC(2009)1089 – C7-0172/2009 – 2009/2068(DEC)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2013a. Legislative resolution of 12 June 2013 on the draft Council regulation on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis (10273/2013 – C7-0160/2013 – 2010/0312(NLE)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2013b. European Parliament resolution of 23 October 2013 on migratory flows in the Mediterranean, with particular attention to the tragic events off Lampedusa (2013/2827(RSP)).
   Google Scholar
• EUbusiness, 2012. Parliament boycotts EU justice talks in protest over Schengen, 15 June 2012 [online]. Available from: http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/immigration.h5p/ [Accessed 14 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Guild, E., 2006. Danger – borders under construction: assessing the first five years of border policy in an area of freedom, security and justice. In: J. de Zwaan and F. Goudappel, eds. Freedom, security and justice in the European Union: implementation of the Hague Programme. The Hague: Asser Press, 45–72.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords European Union Committee, 2008. FRONTEX: the EU external borders agency. Report with Evidence. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, K., 2015. The European parliament as a negotiator in codecision – factors for its success, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, K., and Shackleton, M., 2013. Codecision: a practitioner’s view from inside the parliament. Journal of European public policy, 20 (7), 1040–1055. 10.1080/13501763.2013.795396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., and Leonard, S., 2012. Introduction – after the Stockholm Programme: an area of freedom, security and justice in the European Union? In: C. Kaunert and S. Leonard, eds. Developing European internal security policy – after the Stockholm summit and the Lisbon Treaty. Abingdon: Routledge, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnert, G., 2009. Touristen aus EU-Drittstaaten als potentielle Terroristen? Ein kritischer Blick auf Ursprünge, Entwicklungen und aktuelle Tendenzen der EU-Aussengrenzenpolitik [Tourists from EU-third countries as potential terrorists? A critical view on origins, developments and current trends regarding the EU external borders' policy]. In: M. Gehler and A. Pudlat, eds. Grenzen in Europa [Borders in Europe]. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 211–268.
   Google Scholar
• Lopatin, E., 2013. The changing position of the European parliament on irregular migration and Asylum under co-decision. Journal of common market studies, 51 (4), 740–755. 10.1111/jcms.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J., 2010. The institutional framework of the AFSJ: specific challenges and dynamics of change. In: J. Monar, eds. The institutional dimension of the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice. Peter Lang, 2010 College of Europe studies. Brussels: P.I.E., 11, 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Pascouau, Y., 2012. Schengen and solidarity: the fragile balance between mutual trust and mistrust. Policy Paper EPC and Notre Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, S., 2011. EU justice and home affairs law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Presidency, 2005. Note from the Presidency, Council document 6798/05.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., 2010. Point of no return? The European parliament after Lisbon and Stockholm. European security, 19 (2), 191–207. 10.1080/09662839.2010.508494
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., 2012. Playing the co-decision game? Rules changes and institutional adaptation at the LIBE committee. Journal of European integration, 34 (1), 55–73. 10.1080/07036337.2011.566332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar