Theorising inter-organisational relations: the “EU–NATO relationship” as a catalytic case study

References

• Adler, E., 2005. Communitarian International Relations: the epistemic foundations of International Relations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E., 2008. The spread of security communities: communities of practices, self-restraint, and NATO’s post-Cold War evolution. European journal of international relations, 14 (2), 195–230. doi: 10.1177/1354066108089241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., 1995. EU, NATO, and CSCE responses to the Yugoslav crisis: testing Europe’s new security architecture. European security, 4 (2), 328–353. doi: 10.1080/09662839508407222
   Google Scholar
• Bailes, A.J.K., 1996. European defence and security: the role of NATO, WEU and EU. Security dialogue, 27 (1), 55–64. doi: 10.1177/0967010696027001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2008. Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking: the Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting. Review of international organizations, 3 (2), 151–177. doi: 10.1007/s11558-007-9027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2009. Inter-organizationalism in theory and practice. In: J.A. Koops, ed. Military crisis management: the challenge of inter-organizationalism, special issue of Studia Diplomatica. Brussels: Royal Institute for International Relations, Vol. LXII, No. 3, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2014. NATO’s troubled relations with partner organizations. A resource dependence explanation. In: S. Mayer, ed. NATO’s post-cold bureaucracy and the changing provision of security. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 215–234.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2017. Legitimizing inter-organizational relations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 337–364.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R. and Harsch, M.F., 2017. Resource dependence theory. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R. and Koops, J.A., 2017. Studying relations among international organizations in world politics: core concepts and challenges. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. and Andersson, J., eds., 2008. The EU and the European security strategy: a global agenda for positive power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer, S.J., 1967. The “political union” debate in Europe: a case study in intergovernmental diplomacy. International organization, 21 (1), 24–54. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300013126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosig, M., 2010. Governance between international institutions: analysing interaction modes between the EU, the council of Europe and the OSCE. In: D. Galbreath and C. Gebhard, eds. Cooperation or conflict? Problematizing organizational overlap in Europe. London: Ashgate, 29–58.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, M., 2017. Regime complexity and resource dependence theory in international peacekeeping. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 447–470.
   Google Scholar
• Brugger, P., Hasenclever, A., and Kasten, L., 2017. Trust among international organizations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 407–426.
   Google Scholar
• Calleo, D.P., 2003. Transatlantic folly: NATO vs. the EU. World policy journal, 20 (3), 17–24. doi: 10.1215/07402775-2003-4001
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. and Cornish, P., 2002. The European defence project and the Prague summit. International affairs, 78 (4), 777–788. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clermont, K.M. and Eisenberg, T., 1995. Exorcising the evil of forum-shopping. Cornell law review, 8, 1507–1535.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., 2017. Assessing influence between international organizations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 389–405.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., and Jørgensen, K.E., eds., 2012. The influence of international institutions on the EU: when multilateralism hits Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2003. European security strategy: a more secure Europe in a better world. Available from: http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/solanae.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2016. Joint declaration by the president of the European Council, the president of the European Commission and the secretary-general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-16-2459_en.htm [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Cropper, S., et al., eds., 2008. The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K.W., et al., 1957. Political community and the north Atlantic area: international organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, H., 2013. Organizational ecology, institutional choice and the future of EU crisis management. Paper presented at the workshop ‘CSDP Strategy: A Reality or Wishful Thinking’, University of Surrey, 1 February.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48 (2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drent, M., Hendriks, R., and Zandee, D., 2015. New threats, new NATO and EU responses. The Hague: Clingendael.
   Google Scholar
• Drieskens, E. and Reykers, Y., 2017. The principal-agent model and inter-organizational relations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 271–288.
   Google Scholar
• Drozdiak, W., 2015. Why can’t and the EU just get along? Brookings Institution. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2015/09/28/why-cant-nato-and-the-eu-just-get-along/ [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S., 2008. The future of EU-NATO relations: a case of mutual irrelevance through competition? Journal of European integration, 30 (1), 27–43. doi: 10.1080/07036330801959457
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S. and Gebhard, C., 2017. The EU and NATO’s dilemmas with Russia and prospects for deconfliction. European security, 26 (3), 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun-Ozkanca, O., 2016. Turkish soft balancing against the EU? An analysis of the prospects for improved transatlantic security relations. Foreign policy analysis [online]. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/29765044/Turkish_Soft_Balancing_Against_the_EU_An_Analysis_of_the_Prospects_for_Improved_Transatlantic_Security_Relations
   Google Scholar
• Dursun-Ozkanca, O. and Mazzucelli, C., 2011. Veto players inside and out: the future of EU-NATO security relations as explained in a comparative foreign policy analysis of French and Turkish grand strategies. Paper prepared for delivery at the 5th Annual Research Conference of the EU Centre of Excellence, 10–12 April, Dalhouise University.
   Google Scholar
• Egger, C., 2013. Being the best at winning the peace. NATO and EU rival development of a comprehensive approach to crisis management. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00804164/document [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R.M., 1962. Power-dependence relations. American sociological review, 27 (1), 31–41. doi: 10.2307/2089716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderlein, H., Wallti, S., and Zurn, M., 2010. Handbook on multi-level governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A., 1963. The epigenesis of political communities at the international level. American journal of sociology, 68 (4), 407–421. doi: 10.1086/223398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, D. and Gebhard, C., eds. 2010. Cooperation or conflict? Problematizing organizational overlap in Europe. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, C. and Smith, S.J., 2015. The two faces of EU–NATO cooperation: counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast. Cooperation and conflict, 50 (1), 107–127. doi: 10.1177/0010836714532917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2014. Security. EU-NATO relations: informal cooperation as a common lifestyle. In: A. Orsini, ed. The long-term political action of the EU with(in) international organizations. London: Ashgate, 157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2016. European security as practice: EU–NATO communities of practice in the making? European security, 25 (4), 478–501. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1236021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2017. Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches. European Security, 26 (3), 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N. and Haugevik, K., 2011. The EU’s performance with and within NATO: assessing objectives, outcomes and organisational practices. Journal of European integration, 33 (6), 743–757. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2011.606698
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, M.D., 1972. Sweden, Scandinavia and the EEC. International affairs, 48 (3), 424–437. doi: 10.2307/2612718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J., 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American journal of sociology, 82 (5), 929–964. doi: 10.1086/226424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsch, M.F., 2015. The power of dependence: NATO-UN cooperation in crisis management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M.J., 1997. Organization theory: modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.G., et al., eds., 2006. Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2009. Overlapping institutions in the realm of international security: the case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on politics, 7 (1), 45–52. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709090070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2011. Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European security architecture. Journal of common market studies, 49 (1), 101–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02131.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. and Reynolds, C., 2007. Die EU-NATO Beziehungen: Zeit für Tauwetter. SWP Aktuell, 37, July. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S., Rosenthal, S., and Dann, J., 1991. Coping with the uncertainties of European security: an interview with Stanley Hoffmann. Harvard international review, 14 (1), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hopia, H., 2013, Breaking down the walls: improving EU-NATO relations. Brussels: Center for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2003. ESDP and NATO: wedlock or deadlock? Cooperation and conflict, 38 (3), 235–254. doi: 10.1177/00108367030383003
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2005. The Euro-Atlantic security dilemma: France, Britain and the ESDP. Journal of transatlantic studies, 3 (1), 39–54. doi: 10.1080/14794010508656816
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2007. Security and defence policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2013. The EU and NATO after Libya and Afghanistan: the future of Euro-U.S. Security cooperation. Yale journal of international affairs, 8 (1), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2017. Strategic autonomy and EU-NATO cooperation: squaring the circle. Security Policy Brief No. 85, May. Brussels: Egmont Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. and Keeler, J. eds., 2003. Defending Europe: the EU, NATO and the quest for European autonomy. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ilves, L., et al., 2016. European Union and NATO global cybersecurity challenges: a way forward. PRISM Volume 6, No. 2, July.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., 1986. Interorganization theory and international organization. International studies quarterly, 30 (1), 39–57. doi: 10.2307/2600436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., 1987. International aviation and the politics of regime change. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., 1993. International organization and co-operation: an interorganizational perspective. International social science journal, 138, 463–477.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., 2017. IR paradigms and inter-organizational theory: situating the research program within the discipline. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K.E. ed., 2009. The European Union and International Organisations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A., 2007. The institutionalisation of EU crisis management policies: the case of EUFOR Althea. Paper presented at the EU Crisis Management Conference, Brussels, June.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K., 1968. The interaction of regional subsystems: some preliminary notes on recurrent patterns and the role of superpowers. World politics, 21 (1), 84–107. doi: 10.2307/2009747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karns, M.P. and Mingst, K.A., 2010. International organizations: the politics and processes of global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R., 2010. Pursuing effective multilateralism, international organisations and the politics of decisionmaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J., 2008. Towards effective and integrative inter-organizationalism. In: K. Brockmann, H.B. Hauck and S. Reigeluth, eds. From conflict to regional stability: linking security and development. Berlin: DGAP Forschungsbericht, 23–31. Available from: https://dgap.org/en/article/getFullPDF/17968 [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., ed., 2009. Military crisis management: the challenge of interorganizationalism, studia diplomatica. Brussels: Egmont Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koops J.A., 2011. The European Union an integrative power: assessing the EU’s effective multilateralism towards NATO and the United Nations. Brussels: VUBPress.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2012. NATO’s influence on the evolution of the European Union as a security actor. In: O. Costa and K.E. Jørgensen, eds. The influence of international institutions on the EU: when multilateralism hits Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–185.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2013. Inter-organizational approaches. In: K.E. Jørgensen and K.V. Laatikainen, eds. The Routledge handbook of Europe and multilateral institutions. London: Routledge, 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2017. Inter-organizationalism in International Relations: a multilevel framework of analysis. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 189–216.
   Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, K.V. and Smith, K.E., eds., 2006. The European Union at the United Nations: intersecting multilateralisms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann, N., 2010. NATO-CSDP-EU relations: sketching the map of a community of practice. Working Paper 34, McGill University: Center for International Peace and Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. and White, P.E., 1961. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative science quarterly, 5 (4), 583–601. doi: 10.2307/2390622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodgaard, S., 1992. Competing schemes for Europe: the CSCE, NATO and the European Union. Security dialogue, 23 (3), 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaj, G. and Koops, J.A., 2012. Inconvenient multilateralism: the challenges of the EU as a player in the United Nations Human Rights Council. In: J. Wetzel, ed. The EU as a global player in human rights. London: Routledge, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., 1996. An actor-centred approach to multi-level governance. Regional and federal studies, 6 (2), 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13597569608420966
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. and Hooghe, L., 2004. Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In: I. Bache and M. Flinders, eds. Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, L.T., 1963. Evolving United States relations with the Atlantic community. International organization, 17 (3), 610–627. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300034573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missiroli, A., 2002. EU-NATO cooperation in crisis management: no Turkish delight for ESDP. Security dialogue, 33 (9), 9–26. doi: 10.1177/0967010602033001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO, 1996. Final Communiqué of the Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Berlin, 3 June. Available from: http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1996/p96-063e.htm [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2004. Inter-organisational relations as a factor shaping the EU’s external identity. UPI Working Papers, 49. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2006. The EU and NATO: two competing models for a common defence policy. Journal of common market studies, 44 (1), 57–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H. 2007. Inter-organisational relations: the new facet of European security policy. In: T. Forsberg, T. Kivimäki, and L. Laakso, eds. Europe in context. Insights to the foreign policy of the EU. Helsinki: Finnish International Studies Association, Publications N. 1, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2011. The EU as a security actor: in and with the UN and NATO. In: D. Bourantonis and S. Blavoukos, eds. The EU presence in international organisations. Abingdon: Routledge, 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2017. Power in inter-organizational relations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 365–388.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, P., 2017, Countering hybrid threats: EU-NATO cooperation. European Parliamentary Research Service Briefing, March. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Pernik, P., 2014. Improving cyber security: NATO and the EU. Tallinn: International Center for Defence Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, I., 2004. The OSCE, NATO and the EU within the “network of interlocking European security institutions”: hierarchization, flexibilization, marginalization. In: IFSH, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, ed., OSCE yearbook 2003. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 381–402.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R., 1978. The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R., 2003. The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichard, M., 2006. The EU-NATO relationship: a legal and political perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reinalda, B. and Kille, K., 2017. The evolvement of international secretariats, executive heads and leadership in inter-organizational relations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 217–242.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C., 2007. Governing security in the European Union: institutions as dynamics and obstacles. In: D. de Bievre and C. Neuhold, eds. Dynamics and obstacles of European governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, F., 2017. Population ecology: how the environment influences the evolution of organizations. In: R. Biermann and J.A. Koops, eds. The Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S.A., 1973. The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. The American economic review, 63 (2), 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich, C., 2014. NATO and EU in conflict regulation: interlocking institutions and division of labour. Journal of transatlantic studies, 12 (2), 182–205. doi: 10.1080/14794012.2014.900970
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, C., 2015. Inter-institutionelle Kooperation von EU und NATO: Ein Vergleich der Konfliktmanagementsituationen im Kosovo und in Afghanistan. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., ed., 1998. Organizations. Rational, natural, and open systems. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, C., Jacobson, H.K., and Kaplan, J.H., 1996. Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992. International organization, 50 (4), 593–627. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003352X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simón, L., 2010. The EU-NATO conundrum in context: bringing the state back in. In: D. Galbreath and C. Gebhard, eds. Cooperation or conflict? Problematizing organizational overlap in Europe. London: Ashgate, 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Simón, L., 2013. Geopolitical change, grand strategy and European security: the EU-NATO conundrum in perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D., 1961. The level-of-analysis problem in International Relations, world politics. The international system: theoretical essays, 14 (1), 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, S.R., 1990. NATO’s future in a New Europe: an American perspective. International affairs, 66 (3), 495–511. doi: 10.2307/2623070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, S.R., 2002. NATO, the European Union and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain reconsidered. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., 2011. EU-NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue? European security, 20 (2), 243–264. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2011.557771
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., 2014. The European Union and NATO beyond berlin plus: the institutionalisation of informal cooperation. PhD thesis, Loughborough University. Available from: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/14341 [Accessed 4 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Smithers, P., 1979. Towards greater coherence among inter-governmental organizations through governmental control. In: B. Andemicael, ed. Regionalism and the United Nations. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana, 13–70.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., 1990. Averting anarchy in the new Europe. International security, 14 (4), 5–41. doi: 10.2307/2538749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J.D., 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D., 1965. General de Gaulle and the Anglo-Saxons. International affairs, 41 (1), 11–21. doi: 10.2307/2611945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eekelen, W. 1991. The role of the WEU in European security. Harvard international review, 14, 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Valasek, T., 2007. The roadmap to better EU-NATO relations. Briefing Note. London: Centre of European Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Varwick, J. and Koops, J., 2009. The European Union and NATO: ‘shrewd interorganizationalism’ in the making? In: K.E. Jørgensen, ed. The European Union and international organizations. London: Routledge, 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K., 1959. Man, the state, and war. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R., 2004. NATO, the EU and ESDP: an emerging division of labour? Contemporary security policy, 25 (3), 430–451. doi: 10.1080/1352326042000330592
   Google Scholar
• Wolfers, A., 1963. Integration in the West: the conflict of perspectives. International organization, 17 (3), 753–770. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300034640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J., 1991. Europe’s security: a great confusion. International affairs, 67 (1), 127–137. doi: 10.2307/2621223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar