282
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The force of relationships: the influence of personal networks on the market for force

Pages 98-113 | Received 02 Jun 2017, Accepted 04 Jan 2018, Published online: 17 Jan 2018

References

  • Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M.C., 2011. Security beyond the state: private security in international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Adams, B. and Webb, R., 2002. Trust in small military teams. In: Command and control research and technology symposium. Quebec City.
  • Akcinaroglu, S. and Radziszewski, E., 2013. Private military companies, opportunities, and termination of civil wars in Africa. Journal of conflict resolution, 57 (5), 795–821. doi: 10.1177/0022002712449325
  • Avant, D., 2005. The market for force: the consequences of privatizing security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beckert, J., 2009. The social order of markets. Theory and society, 38 (3), 245–269. doi: 10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0
  • Bender, B., 2010. From the Pentagon to the private sector. Boston Globe, 26 December.
  • Brauer, J., 2008. Pmcs: markets, ethics and economics. In: A. Alexandra, D-P. Baker and M. Caparini, eds. Private military and security companies. London: Routledge, 102–115.
  • Burt, R., 2001. Bandwith and echo: trust, information, and gossip in social networks. In: A. Casella and J. Rauch, eds. Networks and markets: contributions from economics and sociology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 30–74.
  • Burt, R., 1993. The social structure of competition. In: R. Swedberg, ed. Explorations in economic sociology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 65–103.
  • Carafano, J.J., 2008. Private sector, public wars: contractors in combat – Afghanistan, Iraq, and future conflicts. The changing face of war. . Westport, CN: Praeger Security International.
  • Center for Public Integrity, 2013. Windfalls of war: Pentagon’s no-bid contracts triple in 10 years of war.
  • Chatterjee, P., 2009. Halliburton’s army: the long, strange tale of a private, profitable and out-of-control Texas oil company. New York, NY: Nation Books.
  • Chisholm, A., 2015. From warriors of empire to material contractors: reimagining gurkhas in private security. In: M. Eichler, ed. Gender and private security in global politics. Oxford: OUP, 95–113.
  • Chesterman, D. and Lehnardt, C., 2007. Introduction. In: D. Chesterman and C. Lehnardt, eds. From mercenaries to market. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–7.
  • Committee on Government Reform, 2006. Private security firms standard, cooperation and coordination on the battlefield. Washington, DC: Committee on Government Reform.
  • Cotton, S.K., et al., 2010. Hired guns: the roles and implications of armed contractors in operation Iraqi freedom. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Donald, D., 2006. After the bubble. British private security companies after Iraq. Whitehall Paper 66. London: Royal United Services Institute.
  • Drutschmann, S., 2007. Informal regulation: an economic perspective on the private security industry. In: T. Jaeger and G. Kuemmel, eds. Private military and security companies. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften, 443–455.
  • Drutschmann, S., 2014. Motivation, markets, and client relations in the British private security industry. London: Kings College Dissertation.
  • Dunigan, M., 2011. Victory for hire: private security companies’ impact on military effectiveness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Dunigan, M., and Petersohn, U., 2015. The markets for force: privatization of security across world regions. 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Eichler, M., 2014. Gender and private security in global politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Engbrecht, S., 2011. America's covert warriors: inside the world of private military contractors. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
  • Fainaru, S., 2008. Big boy rules: America’s mercenaries fighting in Iraq. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
  • Fligstein, N., 1996. Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American sociological review, 61 (4), 656–673. doi: 10.2307/2096398
  • Fligstein, N., and Dauter, L., 2007. The sociology of markets. Annual review of sociology, 33, 105–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736
  • Gansler, J., 2003. Six myths of competitive sourcing. Government Executive, 1 July.
  • George, A.L., and Bennett, A., 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Bcsia studies in international security. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Government Accountability Office, 2008. Defense contracting. Post-Government Employment of Former Dod Officials Needs Greater Transparency. Report to Congressional Committees. Washington, DC.
  • Granovetter, M., 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91 (3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
  • Granovetter, M., 2005. The impact of social struture on economic outcomes. Journal of economic perspectives, 19 (1), 33–50. doi: 10.1257/0895330053147958
  • Granovetter, M.S., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78 (6), 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
  • Greif, A., 1989. Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: evidence on maghribi traders. The journal of economic history, 49 (4), 857–882. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700009475
  • Hilke, J., 1993. Cost saving from privatization: a compilation of study findings. Los Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation.
  • IISS, 2014. The military balance. London: IISS.
  • Isenberg, D., 2009. Shadow force: private security contractors in Iraq. Westport, CN: Praeger Security International.
  • Jackson, W., 2007. On the social structure of markets. Cambridge journal of economics, 31 (2), 235–253. doi: 10.1093/cje/bel031
  • Jackson, W.A., 2003. Social structure in economic theory. Journal of economic issues (association for evolutionary economics), 37 (3), 727–746. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2003.11506611
  • Keohane, R.O., 1986. Reciprocity in international relations. International organization, 40 (1), 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004458
  • Kinsey, C., 2006. Corporate soldiers and international security: the rise of private military companies. contemporary security studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Krahmann, E., 2010. States, citizens, and the privatisation of security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leung, R., 2003. All in the familiy. CBS News, 60 Minutes, 25 April.
  • Lie, J., 1997. Sociology of markets. Annual review of sociology, 23, 341–360. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.341
  • Lin, N., 1999. Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22 (1), 28–51.
  • Mahoney, C., 2017. Buyer beware: how market structure affects contracting and company performance in the private military industry. Security studies, 26 (1), 30–39. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1243912
  • Makinson, L., 2004. Outsourcing the Pentagon. Who benefits from the politics and economics of national security?  Washington, DC: Center for Public Integrity.
  • McKenzie, N., 2006. Armed and ready: private soldier in Iraq. The Age, 1 July, 6.
  • Murphy, J., 2011. Interview with Former Executive Outcomes Employee, Wayne Bisset.
  • Petersohn, U., 2014. The impact of mercenaries and private military and security companies (PMSCs) on civil war severity between 1946 and 2002. International interactions, 40 (2), 191–215. doi: 10.1080/03050629.2014.880699
  • Petersohn, U., 2011. The other side of the coin. Private security contractors and counterinsurgency operations. . Studies of conflict and terrorism, 34 (10), 782–801. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2011.604832
  • Petersohn, U., 2017. Private military and security companies (PMSCs), military effectiveness, and conflict severity in weak states, 1990–2007. Journal of conflict resolution, 61 (5), 1046–1072. doi: 10.1177/0022002715600758
  • Petersohn, U., 2015. The social structure of the market for force. Cooperation and conflict, 50 (2), 296–285. doi: 10.1177/0010836714545686
  • Prince, E., 2013. Civilian warriors. The inside story of blackwater and the unsing heroes of the war on terror. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
  • Rasor, D. and Bauman, R., 2007. Betraying our troops: the destructive results of privatizing war. 1st ed. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rimli, L. and Schmeidel, S., 2007. Private security companies and local populations. Geneva: Swiss Peace.
  • Rojas, F., 2006. Sociological imperialism in three theories of the market. Journal of institutional economics, 2 (3), 339–363. doi: 10.1017/S1744137406000440
  • Rosenbaum, E., 2000. What is a market? On the methodology of a contested concept. Review of social economy, 58 (4), 455–482. doi: 10.1080/00346760050204300
  • Rubin, E., 1997. An Army of One’s Own. Harpers Magazine, February, 44–55.
  • Shepard, B., 2008. The circuit. London: Pan books.
  • Siebold, G.L., 2007. The essence of military group cohesion. Armed forces & society, 33 (2), 286–295. doi: 10.1177/0095327X06294173
  • Simons, S., 2009. Master of war: Blackwater Usa’s Erik Prince and the Business of War. 1st ed. New York, NY: Collins.
  • Singer, P.W., 2003. Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry. Cornell studies in security affairs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Skehan, C., 2007. Aussies put lives on line for big pay day. Sydney Morning Herald, 17 July.
  • Stoddard, A., Harmer, A., and DiDomenico, V., 2008. The use of private security providers and services in humanitarian operations. HPG Report 27. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Verkuil, P.R., 2007. Outsourcing sovereignty: why privatization of government functions threatens democracy and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wayne, L., 2002. America’s for-profit secret army. New York Times, 13 October.
  • Wayne, L., 2005. An office and a gentleman, New York Times, 19 June.
  • Yeager, J., 2008. High risk civilian contracting. Tactical Response.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.