A more martial Europe? Public opinion, permissive consensus, and EU defence policy

References

• Baum, M.A., 2013. The Iraq coalition of the willing and (politically) able: party systems, the press, and public influence on foreign policy. American journal of political science, 57 (2), 442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M.A. and Potter, P.B., 2015. War and democratic constraint: how the public influences foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, M. and Gyrd-Hansen, D., 2005. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health economics, 14 (10), 1079–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M.M. and Scheve, K.F., 2013. Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 110 (34), 13763–13768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, D., 2014. The determinants of US public opinion towards democracy promotion. Political behavior, 36 (4), 705–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannlund, R. and Persson, L., 2012. To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate policy, 12 (6), 704–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummer, K., 2007. Superficial, not substantial: the ambiguity of public support for Europe’s security and defence policy. European security 16 (2), 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E.G. and Stimson, J.A., 1980. The two faces of issue voting. American political science review, 74 (1), 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C.J. and Singh, A., 2004. A decision theoretic model of public opinion: guns, butter, and European common defence. American journal of political science, 48 (2), 218–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN GOP Presidential Town Hall, 2016. TV, CNN, Mar 29. Available from: https://archive.org/details/CNNW_20160330_040000_CNN_GOP_Presidential_Town_Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P.E., 1970. Attitudes and non-attitudes: continuation of a dialogue. In: E.R. Tufte, ed. The quantitative analysis of social problems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 168–189.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P.E., 2006. The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical review, 18 (1–3), 1–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S., 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., 2013. Europeans say no to military intervention [online]. Carnegie Europe. Available from: http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=53039 [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F., 1972. Europe’s role in world peace. In: R. Mayne, ed. Europe tomorrow. London: Fontana, 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Eichenberg, R.C. and Stoll, R., 2003. Representing defense: democratic control of the defense budget in the United States and Western Europe. Journal of conflict resolution, 47 (4), 399–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer, 2000. Building Europe and the European Union: The European Parliament, public safety, and defence policy, November–December 2000. Brussels: Commission of the European Community, No. 54.1.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer, 2016. Public opinion in the European Union (Aggregate Report). Brussels: Commission of the European Community, No. 85.
   Google Scholar
• Everts, P., et al., 2012. Transatlantic trends survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-08-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34715.v1
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Irondelle, B., and Mérand, F., 2009. Public opinion and ESDP: does strategic culture matter? Paper presented at the EUSA Conference, Network of European Union Centers of Excellence, Los Angeles, 23–25 April.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. and Irondelle, B., 2010. L’opinion publique française et la PESD. In: A. Dumoulin, ed. Opinion publique et politique européenne de sécurité et de défense commune: acteurs, positions, evolutions. Brussels: Bruylant, 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., Irondelle, B., and Mérand, F., 2014. Public opinion support for ESDP: lessons from a longitudinal approach. Paper presented at the Seventeenth international conference of the council for European studies, Montreal, 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, R.M., 2010. Remarks by secretary gates at the national defense university, Washington, DC, February 23. Available from: http://archive.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1423 [Accessed 12 Sep 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Gates, R.M., 2011. Remarks by secretary gates at the security and defense agenda, Brussels, June 10. Available from: http://archive.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=4839 [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• GMFUS (German Marshall Fund of the United States), 2004. Transatlantic survey shows continued, significant split in U.S. – Europe relations. Available from: http://www.gmfus.org/press/article.cfm?id=12&parent_type=R [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• GMFUS (German Marshall Fund of the United States), 2006. Transatlantic trends – key findings. Available from: http://www.gmfus.org/file/3473/download.
   Google Scholar
• GMFUS (German Marshall Fund of the United States), 2014. Transatlantic trends – key findings.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Ryan, M., and Wright, R., 2003. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. Health economics, 12 (1), 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardisty, D.J., Johnson, E.J., and Weber, E.U., 2010. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological science, 21 (1), 86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O.R., 2004. Public opinion and American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G., 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British journal of political science, 39 (1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz, J. and Peffley, M., 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. The American political science review, 81 (4), 1099–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isernia, P. and Everts, P.P., 2006. European public opinion on security issues. European security, 15 (4), 451–469.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W.G., 2000. Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American journal of political science, 44 (4), 750–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentleson, B.W., 1992. The pretty prudent public: post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International studies quarterly, 36 (1), 49–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentleson, B.W. and Britton, R.L., 1998. Still pretty prudent post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of conflict resolution, 42 (4), 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, R., 2002. Power and weakness. Policy Review, 113, 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kentmen, C., 2010. Bases of support for the EU’s common foreign and security policy: gender, attitudes toward economic integration, and attachment to Europe. International political science review, 31 (3), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernic, F., Callaghan, J., and Manigart, P., 2002. Public opinion on European security and defence. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, J. D. and Zeitzoff, T., 2017. A bottom-up theory of public opinion about foreign policy. American journal of political science, 61 (3), 543–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, B., 2014. Defence: coaxing Europe from its comfort blanket. Deutsche Welle, 4 Feb. Available from: http://dw.com/p/1B2Uc [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J.W., 1998. How rational is “the rational public”? Evidence from U.S. public opinion on military spending. Journal of conflict resolution, 42 (5), 544–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S.-P., 2014. Predicting support of climate policies by using a protection motivation model. Climate policy, 15 (3), 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L.N. and Scheingold, S.A., 1970. Europe’s would-be polity: patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E.D. and Milner, H.V., 2018. The domestic politics of preferential trade agreements in hard times. World trade review, 17(3), 371–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E.D. and Mutz, D.C., 2013. US versus them: mass attitudes toward offshore outsourcing. World politics, 65 (4), 571–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H.V. and Tingley, D., 2013. Public opinion and foreign aid: a review essay. International interactions, 39 (3), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., 1997. Representation and the democratic deficit. European journal of political research, 32 (2), 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J.S., 2004. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J., 2006. Civilian power Europe: review of the original and current debates. Cooperation and conflict, 41 (1), 123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perla, H., 2011. Explaining public support for the use of military force: the impact of reference point framing and prospective decision making. International organization, 65 (1), 139–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, D., 2011. A divided union? Public opinion and the EU’s common foreign, security and defence policy. RECON Online Working Paper 2011/19, RENA – Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D., 2014. European security policy for the people? Public opinion and the EU’s common foreign, security and defence policy. European security, 23 (4), 388–408.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B.R., 2004a. The unipolar moment and ESDP. Unpublished paper presented to University of Pennsylvania seminar series. Available from: https://bc.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/Posen_12.02.04.pdf [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B.R., 2004b. ESDP and the structure of world power. The international spectator, 39 (1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, L. and Johnston, G. 2007. European anti-Americanism and choices for a European defence policy. PS: political science and politics, 40 (1), 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. and Wordsworth, S., 2000. Sensitivity of willingness to pay estimates to the level of attributes in discrete choice experiments. Scottish journal of political economy, 47 (5), 504–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, H., 2008. Identity, instrumental self-interest and institutional evaluations explaining public opinion on common European policies in foreign affairs and defence. European Union politics, 9 (1), 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., et al., 2005. The Mannheim Eurobarometer trend file 1970-2002. Data set edition, 2, 223.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, R.Y. and Page, B.I., 1988. Foreign policy and the rational public. Journal of conflict resolution, 32 (2), 211–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott, R., 2000. Public opinion and European integration: permissive consensus or premature politicization?. In: B. Nacos, R.Y. Shapiro, and P. Isernia, eds. Decisionmaking in a glass house: mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Sivonen, P., 1990. European security: new, old and borrowed. Journal of peace research, 27 (4), 385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H., 2006. What kind of power? Journal of European public policy, 13 (2), 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.E., 2005. Still “civilian power EU?” European Foreign Policy Unit Working Paper, ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo. Available from: http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/cidel/old/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Smith.pdf [Accessed 7 Aug 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Stavridis, S., 2001. “Militarising” the EU: the concept of civilian power Europe revisited. The international spectator, 36 (4), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckel, F., 2013. Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. European Union politics, 14(1), 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techau, J., 2013. “Will Europeans ever agree on the use of military force?” Carnegie Europe, No. 65. http://carnegieeurope.eu/2013/02/13/will-europeans-ever-agree-on-use-of-military-force-pub-50964 [Accessed 28 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Tournier, V., 2004. Aux armes Européens? Les opinions publiques face à la PESC: les raisons d’un blocage. In: F. Terpan, ed. La PESD: L’UE peut-elle gérer les crises? Toulouse: Presses de l’IEP de Toulouse, 272–301.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., 2005. The democratic legitimacy of European security and defence policy (Vol. 57). Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Available from: https://peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/ISS_EU_occ57.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., 2006. The democratic control of military power Europe. Journal of European public policy, 13 (2), 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEU (Western European Union), 2006. WEU assembly seminar on the role of parliaments in shaping public opinion on European security and defence: parliamentarian should lead public opinion. Paris: WEU assembly press release.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R.G., 1998. From civilian power to superpower? The international identity of the EU. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J., 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. and Feldman, S., 1992. A simple theory of the survey response: answering questions versus revealing preferences. American journal of political science, 36 (3), 579–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar