Internal and external perceptions of small state security: the case of Estonia

References

• Aggestam, L., 2006. Role theory and European foreign policy. A framework of analysis. In: O. Elgström and M. Smith, eds. The European Union’s roles in international politics. Concepts and analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M.G., Levin, S., and Henry, P.J., 2005. Image theory, social identity, and social dominance: structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international images. Political psychology, 26 (1), 27–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailes, A.J.K., Rickli, J.-M., and Thorhallsson, B., 2014. Small states, survival and strategy. In: C. Archer, A.J.K. Bailes, and A. Wivel, eds. Small states and international security. Europe and beyond. Abingdon: Routledge, 26–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, R., 2000. Trust, threat, and stable peace: Swedish great power perceptions 1905–1939. Thesis (Ph D). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, R. and Elgström, O., 2012. Conflicting role conceptions? The European Union in global politics. Foreign policy analysis, 8 (1), 93–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuning, M., 2011. Role theory research in international relations. State of art and blind spots. In: S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H.W. Maull, eds. Role theory in international relations. Approaches and analysis. Abington: Routledge, 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., 2006. How others see us: the causes and consequences of foreign perceptions of America. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaban, N., et al., 2013. Images of the EU beyond its borders: issue-specific and regional perceptions of the European Union power and leadership. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 51 (3), 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, M., 2014. Soft security threats and small states: the case of Estonia. Defence studies, 14 (1), 30–55. doi: 10.1080/14702436.2014.890334
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, M. and Allan, C., 2015. Small states and big ideas: Estonia’s battle for cybersecurity norms. Contemporary security policy, 36 (2), 346–368. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2015.1061765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, M.J.C., 2017. Of friends and foes: reputation and learning in world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croci, O. and Lucarelli, S., 2010. Introduction: Italy in the eyes of others. Modern Italy, 15 (3), 251–257. doi: 10.1080/13532944.2010.490346
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O. and Chaban, N., 2015. Studying external perceptions of the EU: conceptual and methodological approaches. In: V. Bachmann and M. Müller, eds. Perceptions of the EU in Eastern Europe and sub-Saharan Africa: looking in from the outside. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O. and Smith, M., 2006. Introduction. In: O. Elgström and M. Smith, eds. The European Union’s roles in international politics. Concepts and analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrand, S., 2018. State learning and role playing. International environmental cooperation in the Arctic council. Thesis (Ph D). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Ergüvenc, S., 2002. Turkey’s security perceptions. In: V. Yücel and S. Ruysdael, eds. New trends in Turkish foreign policy. New York: Writers Club Press, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, B., 2000. Case study research methods. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.S., 1993. China’s security perceptions: interests and ambitions. Asian survey, 33 (3), 252–271. doi: 10.2307/2645250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetschel, L., 1998. The foreign and security policy interests of small states in today’s Europe. In: L. Goetschel, ed. Small states inside and outside the European Union. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, S., Frank, C., and Maull, H.W., 2011. Introduction. In: S. Harnisch, C. Frank, and H. W. Maull, eds. Role theory in international relations. Approaches and analysis. Abingdon: Routledge, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R.K. and Fischerkeller, M.P., 1995. Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: cognitive-strategic research after the cold war. International organization, 49 (3), 415–450. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, K., 1970. National role conceptions in the study of foreign affairs. International studies quarterly, 14 (3), 233–309. doi: 10.2307/3013584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinski, M.P., 2011. Social trust, anarchy and international conflict. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R., 1976. Perceptions and misperceptions in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jurkynas, M., 2014. Security concerns of the Baltic states in the twenty-first century. In: C. Archer, A.J.K. Bailes, and A. Wivel, eds. Small states and international security. Europe and beyond. Abingdon: Routledge, 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., 1969. Lilliputians’ dilemmas: small states in international politics. International organization, 23 (2), 291–310. doi: 10.1017/S002081830003160X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R.O., and Verba, S., 1994. Designing social inquiry. Scientific interference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirähk, J., 2018. Public opinion and national defence (study commissioned by the Estonian Ministry of Defence). Tallinn: Turu-uuringute AS.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, O.F., 1996. Analysing small-state security: the role of external factors. In: W. Bauwerns, A. Clesse, and O.F. Knudsen, ed. Small states and the security challenges in the new Europe. London: Brassey’s, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, S., 2014. Seen from the outside: the state of the art on the external image of the EU. Journal of European integration, 36 (1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2012.761981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. and Furlong, P., 2002. A skin, not a sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science. In: D. Marsh and G. Stoker, eds. Theory and methods in political science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J., 1996. Reputation and international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mišík, M., 2013. How can perception help us to understand the dynamic between EU member states? The state of the art. Asia Europe journal, 11 (4), 445–463. doi: 10.1007/s10308-013-0364-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. and Šešelgytė, M., 2013. Reinventing ‘new’ Europe: Baltic perspectives on transatlantic security reconfigurations. Communist and post-communist studies, 46, 397–406. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. and Bretherton, C., 2013. EU external policy at the crossroads: the challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International relations, 27 (3), 261–275. doi: 10.1177/0047117813497306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B.C., 2009. It takes all types: social psychology, trust, and the international relations paradigm in our minds. International theory, 1 (3), 345–380. doi: 10.1017/S1752971909990121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R.L., 1968. Alliances and small powers. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E.J. and Biddle, B.J., 1966. The nature and history of role theory. In: B.J. Biddle and E.J. Thomas, eds. Role theory: concepts and research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B., 2006. The size of states in the European Union: theoretical and conceptual perspectives. Journal of European integration, 28 (1), 7–31. doi: 10.1080/07036330500480490
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B., ed. 2018. Small states and shelter theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B. and Wivel, A., 2006. Small states in the European Union: what do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge review of international affairs, 19 (5), 651–668. doi: 10.1080/09557570601003502
   Google Scholar
• Tromer, E., 2006. Baltic perspectives on the European security and defence policy. In: A.J.K. Bailes, G. Herolf, and B. Sundelius, eds. The Nordic countries and the European security and defence policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 364–391.
   Google Scholar
• Veebel, V. and Ploom, I., 2016. Estonian perceptions of security: not only about Russia and the refugees. Journal on baltic security, 2 (2), 35–70. doi: 10.1515/jobs-2016-0046
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S.M., 2017. Lost in translation: social identity theory and the study of status in world politics. International studies quarterly, 61, 821–834. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqx042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisiger, A. and Yarhi-Milo, K., 2015. Revisiting reputation: how past actions matter in international politics. International organizations, 69 (2), 473–495. doi: 10.1017/S0020818314000393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch Larson, D., 2018. New perspectives on rising powers and global governance: status and clubs. International studies review, 20, 247–254. doi: 10.1093/isr/viy039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wivel, A., Bailes, A.J.K., and Archer, C., 2014. Setting the scene: small states and international security. In: C. Archer, A.J.K. Bailes, and A. Wivel, eds. Small states and international security. Europe and beyond. Abingdon: Routledge, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, W.C., et al., 2017. Moral authority and status in international relations: good states and the social dimension of status seeking. Review of international studies, 44 (3), 526–546. doi: 10.1017/S0260210517000560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2009. Case study research. Design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar