References
- Allcott, H., and Gentzkow, M., 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 31 (2), 211–236.
- Andersson, U., Ohlsson, J., Oscarsson, H., and Oskarson, M., 2017. Larmar och gör sig till. In: U. Andersson et al., eds. Larmar och gör sig till. Gothenburg: Göteborgs Universitet, SOM-institutet.
- Archetti, C., 2019. The unbearable thinness of strategic communication. In: C. Bjola and J. Pamment, ed. Countering online propaganda and extremism. The dark side of digital diplomacy. London: Routledge, 81–95.
- Awan, A., Hoskins, A., and O’Loughlin, B., 2011. Radicalisation and media: connectivity and terrorism in the new media ecology. London: Routledge.
- Bail, C.A., et al., 2019. Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency’s impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter Users in Late 2017. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 117 (1), 243–250.
- Baumann, M., 2020. ‘Propaganda fights’ and ‘disinformation campaigns’: the discourse on information warfare in Russia-West relations. Contemporary politics. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2020.1728612
- BBC. 2017. Sweden to Trump: what happened last night? 19 February 2017. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39020962 [Accessed 19 December 2019].
- Bennett, L., and Livingston, S., 2018. The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European journal of communication, 33 (2), 122–139.
- Bergström, A., et al., 2017. Politisering och polarisering i ett yrvaket informationssamhälle. (Politicization and polarization in a drowsy information society) Presented at Västsvenska Arenan, Almedalen, Sweden.
- Bjola, C., 2018. The ethics of countering digital propaganda. Ethics & international affairs, 32 (3), 305–315.
- Bradshaw, S., and Howard, B., 2019. The global disinformation order 2019 global inventory of organised social media manipulation. The Computational Propaganda Project. Oxford: University of Oxford. Available from: https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/09/CyberTroop-Report19.pdf [Accessed 9 March 2020].
- Colliver, C., et al., 2018. Smearing Sweden: international influence campaigns in the 2018 Swedish Election. London: LSE Institute of Global Affairs.
- Corner, J., 2017. Fake news, post-truth and media–political change. Media, culture and society, 39 (7), 1100–1107.
- Crilley, R., and Chatterje-Doody, P., 2020. Emotions and war on YouTube: affective investments in RT’s visual narratives of the conflict in Syria. Cambridge review of international affairs, doi:10.1080/09557571.2020.1719038.
- Crilley, R., Gillespie, M., and Willis, A., 2019. Tweeting the Russian revolution: RT’s #1917LIVE and social media re-enactments as public diplomacy. European journal of cultural studies, doi:10.1177/1367549419871353.
- Della Vigna, S., et al., 2014. Cross-border media and nationalism: evidence from Serbian radio in Croatia. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6 (3), 103–32.
- Deverell, E., 2019. Att identifiera och motstå informationspåverkan: En jämförande studie av hur de nordiska länderna organiserar arbetet [To identify and resist information influence: a comparative study of how the Nordic countries organize the work]. Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift, 1, 31–54.
- DiMaggio, P., et al., 1996. Have American's social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102 (3), 690–755.
- European Commission, 2018. EU action plan on disinformation. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/action-plan-disinformation-commission-contribution-european-council-13-14-december-2018_en [Accessed 9 March 2020].
- European Council, 2015. European Council Meeting – Conclusions, EUCO 11/15, pp. 19–20. Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21888/european-council-conclusions-19-20-march-2015-en.pdf [Accessed 9 March 2020].
- Fridman, O., 2019. A war of definitions: hybridity in Russia and the West. In: O. Fridman, V. Kabernik, and J. C. Pearce, eds. Hybrid conflicts and information warfare: new labels, old politics. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 67–85.
- Government Offices of Sweden, 2017. National security strategy. Available from: https://www.government.se/4aa5de/contentassets/0e04164d7eed462aa511ab03c890372e/national-security-strategy.pdf [Accessed 22 October 2019].
- Groll, E. 2014. Kremlin’s ‘Sputnik’ newswire is the BuzzFeed of propaganda. Foreign Policy, 10 November. Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/11/10/kremlins-sputnik-newswireis-the-buzzfeed-of-propaganda/ [Accessed August 2019].
- Guess, A., Nagler, J., and Tucker, J., 2019. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on facebook. Science advances, 5 (1), 1–8.
- Hallahan, K., et al., 2007. Defining strategic communication. international journal of strategic communication, 1 (1), 3–35.
- Hayes, D., and Guardino, M., 2011. The influence of foreign voices on U.S. public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 55 (4), 830–850.
- Hellman, M., and Wagnsson, C., 2017. How can European states respond to Russian information warfare? An analytical framework. European Security, 26 (2), 153–170.
- Holmberg, S., and Weibull, L., 2017. Långsiktiga förändringar i svenskt institutionsförtroende (Long term changes in trust in Swedish institutions) in Andersson et al., eds. Larmar och gör sig till. Göteborgs Universitet: SOM-institutet.
- Hoskins, A., and O'Loughlin, B., 2015. Arrested war: the third phase of mediatization. Information, communication & society, 18 (11), 1320–1338.
- Jang, S.M., and Kim, J.K., 2017. Third person effects of fake news: fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in human behavior, 80 (1), 295–302.
- Jonsson, O., and Seely, R., 2015. Russian full-spectrum conflict: an appraisal after Ukraine. Journal of Slavic military studies, 28 (1), 1–22.
- Khaldarova, I., and Pantti, M., 2016. Fake news. Journalism practice, 10 (7), 891–901.
- Lanoszka, A., 2019. Disinformation in international politics. European journal of international security, 4 (2), 227–248.
- Lasswell, H., 1927. The theory of political propaganda. The American political science review, 21 (3), 627–631.
- Maan, A., 2018. Narrative warfare. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
- Mahood, S., and Rane, H., 2017. Islamist narratives in ISIS recruitment propaganda. The journal of international communication, 23 (1), 15–35.
- Mejias, U.A., and Vokuev, N.E., 2017. Disinformation and the media: the case of Russia and Ukraine. Media, culture & society, 39 (7), 1027–1042.
- Mickiewicz, E., 2017. No illusions. Oxford: Oxford University press.
- Morrison, D., 1998. The search for a method: focus groups and the development of mass communication research. Luton: University of Luton Press.
- Munger, E., et al., 2020. The (null) effects of clickbait headlines on polarization, trust, and learning. Public opinion quarterly. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaa008
- NATO. 2016. Statement on the implementation of the Joint Declaration signed by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Available from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_138829.htm. [Accessed 9 March 2020].
- Nye, J., 1990. Soft power. Foreign policy, 80, 153–171.
- O’Loughlin, B., 2015. The permanent campaign. Media, war & conflict, 8 (2), 169–171.
- Ördén, H., 2020. Securing judgement. rethinking security and online information threat. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
- Oscarsson, H., 2017. Det svenska partisystemet i förändring. In: U. Andersson et al., eds. Larmar och gör sig till. Gothenburg: Göteborgs Universitet. SOM-institutet.
- Pamment, J., Nothhaft, H., and Fjällhed, A. 2018. Countering information influence activities: the state of the art. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency and Lund University, Research report. Available from: https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/28697.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2019].
- Pennycook, G., Cannon, T.D., and Rand, D.G., 2018. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 147 (12), 1865–1880. doi:10.1037/xge0000465.
- Ramsay, G., and Robertshaw, S., 2018. Weaponising news: RT, sputnik and targeted disinformation. London: King's College London, Centre for the Study of Media, Communication & Power.
- Ramsay, G., and Robertshaw, S., 2019. Weaponising news RT, sputnik and targeted disinformation. London: King’s College.
- Renz, B., 2016. Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’. Contemporary Politics, 22 (3), 283–300.
- Russian Government, 2014. The military doctrine of the Russian Federation. 25 Dec. No. Pr.- 2976. Available in English translation from: http://rusemb.org.uk/press/2029 [Accessed 25 November 2019].
- Russian Government, 2016. Doctrine of information security of the Russian Federation. Available from: https://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2563163 [Accessed 6 May 2020].
- Siegel, A., and Tucker, J.A., 2018. The Islamic State’s information warfare measuring the success of ISIS’s online strategy. Journal of language and politics, 17 (2), 258–280.
- Sismondo, S., 2017. Post-truth. Social studies of science, 47 (1), 3–6.
- Statistics Sweden, 2018. Statistikdatabasen. Available from: http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101A/ [Accessed 7 May 2020].
- Statistics Sweden, 2019. Utbildningsnivån i Sverige (Level of Education in Sweden). Available from: https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/utbildning-jobb-och-pengar/utbildningsnivan-i-sverige/ [Accessed 7 May 2020].
- Stewart, D.W., and Shamdasani, P., 2017. Online focus groups. Journal of advertising, 46 (1), 48–60.
- Stukal, D., et al. 2019. For whom the Bot Tolls: a neural networks approach to measuring political orientation of Twitter Bots in Russia. Sage Open. doi:10.1177/2158244019827715.
- Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, 2018. Countering information influence activities – A handbook for communicators. Available from: https://rib.msb.se/filer/pdf/28698.pdf [Accessed 22 October 2019].
- Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, 2019. Om MSB:s arbete med informationspåverkan [About the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency’s work in relation to information influence]. Available from: https://www.msb.se/sv/amnesomraden/msbs-arbete-vid-olyckor-kriser-och-krig/psykologiskt-forsvar/om-msbs-arbete-med-informationspaverkan/ [Accessed 22 October 2019].
- Szostek, J., 2016. News media repertoires and strategic narrative reception: a paradox of dis/belief in authoritarian Russia. New media and society, 20 (1), 68–87.
- Szostek, J., 2017. Defence and promotion of desired state identity in Russia’s strategic narrative. Geopolitics, 22 (3), 571–593.
- Szostek, J., 2018. Nothing is true? The credibility of news and the conflict in Ukraine. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23 (1), 116–135.
- Tucker, J., et al. 2018. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature. Prepared for Hewlett Foundation, March 2018. Available from: https://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Social-Media-Political-Polarization-and-Political-Disinformation-Literature-Review.pdf [Accessed 22 October 2019].
- US Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, 2018. Putin’s asymmetric assault on democracy in Russia and Europe: implications for U.S. National Security. A minority staff report prepared for the use of the committee on foreign relations. S. Rpt. 115-21. Washington: Government Printing Office.
- Walker, C., 2016. The authoritarian threat: The Hijacking of “soft power”. Journal of democracy, 27 (1), 49–63.
- Walker, C., 2018. What is “sharp power”? Journal of democracy, 29 (3), 9–23.
- Waltzman, R. 2017. The weaponization of information. The need for cognitive security. RAND Corporation. Available from: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/CT400/CT473/RAND_CT473.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2019].
- Watanabe, K. 2018. Conspiracist propaganda: how Russia promotes anti-establishment sentiment online. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference 2018, Hamburg, Available from: file:///C:/Users/s-9426/Downloads/Sputnik05ECPR.pdf [Accessed 8 May 2020].
- Wilbur, D., 2017. Propaganda’s place in strategic communication: the case of ISIL’s Dabiq magazine. International journal of strategic communication. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2017.1317636.
- Yablokov, I., 2015. Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: the case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35 (3–4), 301–315.
- Ziegler, C.E., 2018. International dimensions of electoral processes: Russia, the USA, and the 2016 elections. International politics, 55 (5), 557–574.