Consolidating EU energy security by relying on energy de-politicisation

References

• Andersen, S.S., Goldthau, A., and Sitter, N., 2016. The EU regulatory state, Commission Leadership and external energy governance. In: J. M. Godzimirski, ed. EU Leadership in energy and environmental governance. Hampshire: Palgrave, 51–69.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, D., and Elmes, M., 1997. Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of management review, 22 (2), 429–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyi, A., 2003. New dimensions of energy security of the enlarging EU and their impact on relations with Russia. European integration, 25 (4), 351–369.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, L., et al., 2018. The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environmental politics, 27 (1), 42–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binhack, P., and Tichý, L., 2012. Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech–Russian energy relations. Energy policy, 45, 54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocse, A.-M., 2020. From the United States with shale gas: Ukraine, energy securitization, and the reshaping of transatlantic energy relations. Energy research & social science, 69, 101553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., 2018. Russia's Use of the energy weapon: How Russia manipulates Ukraine, Georgia, and the Baltic states. Morris undergraduate journal, 6 (1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P., 2014. Depoliticisation: economic crisis and political management. Policy & politics, 42 (2), 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., and Wæver, O., 2003. Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Fifth Printing 2007 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and Wilde, J.D., 1998. Security: A New framework for analysis. First ed. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Carrapico, H., and Barrinha, A., 2017. The EU as a coherent (cyber)security actor? Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1254–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, T., 2017. Is Britain a force for good? Investigating British citizens’ narrative understanding of war. Defence studies, 17 (1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, N., 2017. The changing role of nuclear power in the European Union: reflections from official scenarios released before and after the Fukushima Daiichi accident. Theory methodology practice: club of economics in miskolc, 13 (1), 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, C., and Moore, B., 2019. Brexit and the EU in global climate governance. Politics and governance, 7 (3), 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eicke, L., and Petri, F., 2020. The EU in global energy governance. In: M. Knodt, and J. Kemmerzell, eds. Handbook of energy governance in Europe. Cham: Springer, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., et al., 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4 (1), 2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2000. Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2007. An energy policy for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2015. A framework strategy for a resilient energy Union with a forward-Looking climate change policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2019. The European Green deal. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Energy Union [online]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-strategy/energy-union_en [Accessed 5 July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2019. The European Union’s global strategy three years On, Looking forward. Brussels: European External Action Service.
   Google Scholar
• Faure-Schuyer, A., Welsch, M., Pye, S., 2017. European Energy policy objectives. In: M. Welsch, et al., ed. Europe's energy transition: insights for policy making. London: Academic Press, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., 2017. Global energy security and EU energy policy. In: R. Leal-Arcas, and J. Wouters, eds. Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., and Buller, J., 2006. Depoliticisation: principles, tactics and tools. British politics, 1 (3), 293–318.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L., 2006. The transformation in strategic affairs. . First ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glavinis, P., et al., 2021. Integrating EnergyMarkets in the wider Europe. In: M. Mathioulakis, ed. Aspects of the energy union. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave, 115–139.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U.H., and Lundman, B., 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24 (2), 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 1996. The politics of environmental discourse ecological modernization and the policy process. First ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, J., Corman, S., and Goodall, H.L., 2011. Master narratives of Islamist extremism. First ed. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., and Szulecki, K., 2018. Energy securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s Framework to energy. In: K. Szulecki ed. Energy security in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, A., 2020. The energy Charter Treaty: old and new dilemmas in global energy governance. In: M. Knodt, and J. Kemmerzell, eds. Handbook of energy governance in Europe. Cham: Springer, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, S., Pever, M., and Fischer, K., 2019. Constructing low-carbon futures? Competing storylines in the Estonian energy sector’s translation of EU energy goals. Energy policy, 135, 111063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., 1998. Revisiting Copenhagen: or, on the creative development of a security Studies Agenda in Europe. European journal of international relations, 4 (4), 479–505.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K.H., 1992. Dirty politics: deception, distraction, and democracy. First ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M., and Quitzow, R., 2017. Multi-level reinforcement in European climate and energy governance: mobilizing economic interests at the sub-national levels. Environmental policy and governance, 27 (2), 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirušek, M., 2020. The attitude of the Visegrad Group countries towards Russian infrastructural projects in the gas sector. Energy policy, 139, 111340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphof, R., et al., 2017. External competences in energy and climate change. In: R. Leal-Arcas, and J. Wouters, eds. Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochvil, P., and Mišík, M., 2020. Bad external actors and good nuclear energy Media discourse on energy supplies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Energy policy, 136, 111058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruyt, B., et al., 2011. Indicators for energy security. In: B. K. Sovacool, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Energy security. New York: Routledge, 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C., 2014. Politicising UK energy: what ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy & politics, 42 (2), 259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C., 2016. Energy depoliticisation in the UK: destroying political capacity. The British journal of politics and international relations, 18 (1), 107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M., et al., 2021. The geopolitics of the European Green deal. Brussels: Bruegel.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J.M., 2006. The Black Sea and European energy security. Southeast European and Black Sea studies, 6 (2), 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Maleki, A., 2017. Energy security. First ed. Tehran: Donya-e-Eghtesad.
   Google Scholar
• Maltby, T., 2013. European Union energy policy integration a case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy policy, 55, 435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolkidis, S., 2021. Geopolitical challenges and cooperation in the European Energy sector: The case of SE Europe and the Western Balkan Six initiative. In: M. Mathioulakis, ed. Aspects of the energy union. Cham: Palgrave, 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M., 2005. Transcending politics: a new stage in management transformation? The scientization of central banking as case. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 1-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mišík, M., 2016. On the way towards the Energy Union position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration. Energy, 111, 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., and Roselle, L., 2013. Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order. First ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., and Roselle, L., 2017. Forging the world: strategic narratives and international relations. First ed. Michigan: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, S., 2013. Securitization of energy through the lenses of Copenhagen School. Orlando: West East institute, pp. 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pellerin-Carlin, T., 2017. The European energy union. In: R. Leal-Arcas, and J. Wouters, eds. Research handbook on EU energy law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 67–102.
   Google Scholar
• Prange-Gstöhl, H., 2009. Enlarging the EU's internal energy market: Why would third countries accept EU rule export? Energy policy, 37 (12), 5226–5303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. European Union law [online]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html [Accessed 6 July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., and O’Loughlin, B., 2014. Strategic narrative: a new means to understand soft power. Media, war & conflict, 7 (1), 70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ruszel, M., 2020. The significance of the Baltic Sea region for natural gas supplies to the V4 countries. Energy policy, 146, 111786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schittekatte, T., et al., 2021. Making the TEN-E regulation compatible with the Green Deal: eligibility, selection, and cost allocation for PCIs. Energy policy, 156, 112426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, K., 2015. Exporting the energy acquis: The external Agenda shaping power of the EU. In: J. Tosun, S. Biesenbender, and K. Schulze, eds. Energy policy making in the EU. London: Springer, 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E., 2018. War from the ground up: twenty-first century combat as politics. First ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K., 2011. The Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. First ed. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, H.R., 2017. The discursive politics of unconventional gas in Scotland: drifting towards precaution? Energy research & social science, 23, 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo, J., and Fabok, M., 2020. Infrastructures and state-building: comparing the energy politics of the European Commission with the governments of Hungary and Poland. Energy policy, 138, 111253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, B.M., 2019. Europe and the liberal order. Survival, 61 (2), 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., 2020. Securitization and state encroachment on the energy sector: politics of exception in Poland's energy governance. Energy policy, 111066, 136.
   Google Scholar
• Tabrizi, M., 2014. Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches. Social science quarterly, 64, 105–138.
   Google Scholar
• Talus, K., 2017. Decades of EU energy policy: towards politically driven markets. The journal of world energy law & business, 10 (5), 380–388.
   Google Scholar
• Talus, K., and Aalto, P., 2017. Competences in EU energy policy. In: R. Leal-Arcas, and J. Wouters, eds. Research handbook on EU energy law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• The Government of Russian Federation, 2003. Energy strategy of Russia for the period up to 2020. Moscow: Russian Institute of Energy Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Turksen, U., 2018. EU energy relations with Russia: solidarity and the rule of Law. First ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., and Bondas, T., 2013. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and health sciences, 15 (3), 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T., 2017. Rule-maker or rule-taker? The EU and the shifting global political economy of energy. In: R. Leal-Arcas, and J. Wouters, eds. Research handbook on EU energy law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• White, H., 1984. The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and theory, 23 (1), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., and Sovacool, B.K., 2019. The discursive politics of ‘fracking’: frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Global environmental change, 58, 101935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yafimava, K., 2017. ‘The OPAL exemption decision: past, present, and future. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Yermakov, V., 2020. Russian gas: the year of living dangerously Key takeaways for 2020 and beyond. Oxford: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., 2009. Energy security: Europe's new foreign policy challenge. First ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zapletalova, V., and Kominkova, M., 2020. Who is fighting against the EU's energy and climate policy in the European parliament the contribution of the Visegrad group? Energy policy, 139, 111326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar