The EU, sanctions and regional leadership

References

• Aggestam, L., and Johansson, M., 2017. The leadership paradox in EU foreign policy. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1203–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L., and Hedling, E., 2020. Leaderisation in foreign policy: performing the role of EU high representative. European security, 29 (3), 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia, H., and Grauvogel, J. 2019. Easier in than out: The protracted process of ending sanctions, GIGA Focus, Number 5, https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/system/files/publications/gf_global_1905_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, G.C., 2004. Understanding leadership. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M.J., and Marek, D., 2010. Czech foreign policy and EU integration: European and domestic sources. Perspectives on European politics and society, 11 (1), 2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Beaucillon, C. ed. 2021. The research handbook on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boogaerts, A., 2018. An effective sanctioning actor? Merging effectiveness and EU actorness criteria to explain evolutions in (in)effective coercion towards Iran. European security, 27 (2), 138–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S., 2017. Leadership and followership in post-unipolar world: towards selective global leadership and a new functionalism? Chinese political science review, 2, 494–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byman, D.L., and Pollack, K.M., 2001. Let US Now praise great Men: bringing the statesman back In. International security, 25 (4)(Spring), 107–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardwell, P.J., 2015. The legalisation of European Union foreign policy and the use of sanctions. Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies, 17 (1), 287–310.
   Google Scholar
• Cardwell, P.J., 2016. Values in the European Union's foreign policy: an analysis and assessment of CFSP declarations. European foreign affairs review, 21 (4), 601–621.
   Google Scholar
• Cardwell, P.J., 2017. The United Kingdom and the common foreign and security policy of the EU: from Pre-brexit ‘awkward partner’ to post-brexit ‘future partnership’? Croatian yearbook of European law and policy, 13 (1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, A., and Portela, C., 2016. The relationship between United Nations sanctions and regional sanctions regimes. In: T.J. Biersteker, S.E. Eckert, and M. Tourinho, eds. Targeted sanctions: The impacts and effectiveness of united nations action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Higgott, R., and Nossal, K., 1991. Bound to follow? Leadership and followership in the Gulf conflict. Political science quarterly, 106 (3), 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2007. Conclusion of the 2809th Council Meeting 10657/07, Jun 18.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action - A Stronger Europe; a Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Available from: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Druláková, R., and Zemanová, Š, 2020. Why the implementation of multilateral sanctions does (not) work: lessons learned from the Czech Republic. European security, 29 (4), 524–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, C. 2020. EU Human Rights Sanctions Regime: Ambitions, Reality and Risks (December 8). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-64.
   Google Scholar
• Embassy of Switzerland in the United Kingdom, written evidence, Select Committee on the European Union, External Affairs Sub-Committee, ‘Brexit: Sanctions Policy’. 19 September 2017. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/eu-external-affairssubcommittee/brexit-sanctions-policy/written/70458.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., 2016. Targeting peace: understanding UN and EU targeted sanctions. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. ‘Turkey 2012 Progress Report’. SWD(2012) 336 final: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020a. Albania 2020 Report, SWD, 354 final: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/albania_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020b. Montenegro 2020 Report, SWD, 353 final: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/montenegro_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020c. North Macedonia 2020 Report, SWD, 351 final: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/north_macedonia_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020d. Serbia 2020 Report, SWD, 352 final: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/serbia_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020e. Bosnia and Herzegovina 2020 Report, SWD, 350 final: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/default/files/bosnia_and_herzegovina_report_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Sanctions. 2021. Sanctions Profiler: Belarus, https://www.europeansanctions.com/region/belarus/.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Permanent Delegation to the UN in Geneva. 2014. Letter to the Advisory Committee of the Human Rights Council, Apr 8.
   Google Scholar
• Fabre, C., 2018. Economic statecraft: human rights, sanctions, and conditionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G.T., and Uhl-Bien, M., 2012. Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): examining leadership as a relational process. The leadership quarterly, 23 (6), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreign Affairs, 2019. A harmful U.S. sanctions strategy? Foreign affairs asks the experts. Foreign Affairs (11 June). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ask-the-experts/2019-06-11/harmful-us-sanctions-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) (UK). 2020. UK announces first sanctions under new global human rights regime, (6 July). https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-announces-first-sanctions-under-new-global-human-rights-regime.
   Google Scholar
• Giumelli, F., 2010. New analytical categories for assessing EU sanctions. The international spectator, 45 (3), 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Giumelli, F., Hoffmann, F., and Książczaková, A., 2020. The when, what, where and why of European Union sanctions. European Security, early view, DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1797685.
   Google Scholar
• Grint, K., 2005. Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership.’. Human relations, 58 (11), 1467–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, P., 2018. Is the U.S. using sanctions too aggressively? The steps Washington can take to guard against overuse foreign affairs (11 September). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-09-11/us-using-sanctions-too-aggressively.
   Google Scholar
• Hellquist, E., 2016. Either with us or against us? Third-country alignment with EU sanctions against Russia/Ukraine. Cambridge review of international affairs, 29 (3), 997–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellquist, E., 2019. Ostracism and the EU’s contradictory approach to sanctions at home and abroad. Contemporary politics, 25 (4), 393–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig, N., 2015. The high representative of the Union: the Quest for leadership in EU foreign policy. In: D. Spence, and J. Bátora, eds. The European external action service. The European Union in international affairs. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hillion, C., 2019. Norway and the changing common foreign and security policy of the European Union. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) report, 1/19.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., and Portela, C., 2020. La evaluación del éxito de las sanciones internacionales. Revista CIDOB d'Afers internacionals, 125, 39–60. DOI: 10.24241/rcai.2020.125.2.39.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinichenko, P., 2017. Post-crimean twister: Russia, the EU and the law of sanctions. Russian law journal, 5, 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Keatinge, T., et al., 2017. Transatlantic (Mis)alignment: Challenges to US-EU Sanctions Design and Implementation, Occasional Paper, RUSI, July, https://static.rusi.org/20170707_transatlantic_misalignment_keatinge.dall_.tabrizi.lain_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marošková, T., and Spurná, K., 2021. Why did they comply? External incentive model, role-playing and socialization in the alignment of sanctions against Russia in Albania and Montenegro. Journal of European integration, 43 (8), 1005–1023. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1906238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marossi, A.Z., and Bassett, M.R. eds. 2015. Economic sanctions under international Law. The Hague: Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, E.S., 2015. Humanitarian impacts of economic sanctions on Iran and Syria. European security, 24 (1), 120–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret, E., et al., 2016. The New Deterrent? International Sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine Crisis: Impacts, Costs and Further Action, Graduate Institute. Oct 12.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, E., Giumelli, F., and Bastiat-Jarosz, D., 2017. Sanctions on russia: Impacts and economic costs on the United States. Programme for the study of international governance, Graduate Institute of International and Development studies, Geneva, 20 March, https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/library/publications-institute/sanctions-russia-impacts-and-economic-costs-united-states.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, E., and Pothier, F., 2018. Sanctions after Brexit. Survival, 60 (2), 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret, E., 2021. Unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions in crisis: implications of their rising use and misuse in contemporary world politics. In: C. Beaucillon, ed. The research handbook on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J., 2008. The powers to lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C.F., and Karlsson, C., 2014. Leadership and international cooperation. In: P. ‘t Hart, and R. Rhodes, eds. Oxford handbook of political leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 580–594.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. 2021. Chinese counter-sanctions on EU targets, European Parliamentary Research Service, https://epthinktank.eu/2021/05/19/chinese-counter-sanctions-on-eu-targets/.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C., 2010. European Union sanctions and foreign policy: when and why do they work? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C., 2017. The European neighbourhood policy and the politics of sanctions. In: T Demmelhuber, A Marchetti, and T Schumacher, eds. routledge handbook on the European neighbourhood policy. Abingdon: Routledge, 270–278.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C., et al., 2020. Consensus against all odds: explaining the persistence of EU sanctions on russia. Journal of European integration, 43 (6), 683–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridi, Niccolò, and Fikfak, Veronika, 2022. Sanctioning to change state behaviour (March 22, 2022). iCourts working paper series, no. 282. Forthcoming in international journal of dispute settlement.
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H., and Rosén, G., 2017. Arguing sanctions. On the EU's response to the Crisis in Ukraine. JCMS: Journal of Common Market studies, 55 (1), 20–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szép, V., 2020. New intergovernmentalism meets EU sanctions policy. Journal of European integration, 42 (6), 855–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szép, V., and Van Elsuwege, P., 2020. EU sanctions policy and the alignment of third countries: relevant experiences for the UK? In: J.S. Vara, and R.A. Wessel, eds. The routledge handbook on the international dimension of Brexit. Abingdon: Routledge, 226–240.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., 2010. Sanctions as grand strategy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B., and Gunnarsson, P., 2017. Iceland’s alignment with the EU–US sanctions on russia: autonomy versus dependence. Global affairs, 3 (3), 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2019. Political Declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-withdrawal-agreement-and-political-declaration.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., et al., 2014. Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The leadership quarterly, 25 (1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2018. Sanctions unilatérales: un expert de l’ONU dénonce un outil fruste qui pénalise les populations. UN News. Nov 1. Available from: https://news.un.org/fr/story/2018/11/1028152.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International organization, 45 (3), 281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar