Dreams Lab: assembling knowledge security in Sino-Dutch research collaborations

References

• Abrahamsen, R. and Williams, M.C., 2009. Security beyond the state: global security assemblages in international politics. International political sociology, 3 (1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acuto, M. and Curtis, S., 2014. Assemblage thinking and international relations. In: M. Acuto and S. Curtis, eds. Reassembling international theory: assemblage thinking and international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., 2011. International practices. International theory, 3 (1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Universities in the Netherlands, 2021. Kader Kennisveiligheid Universiteiten. Association of Universities in the Netherlands in The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., Jacobsen, K.L., and Monsees, L., 2020. Taking the trouble: science, technology and security studies. Critical studies on security, 8 (2), 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9 (2), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., 2014. Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics. European political science review, 6 (3), 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., Csernatoni, R., and Lavallée, C., 2020. Introduction, emerging security technologies – an uncharted field for the EU. In: A. Calcara, R. Csernantoni, and C. Lavallée, eds. Emerging security technologies and EU governance: actors, practices, and processes. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, M., 2021. Hybrid warfare through the lens of strategic theory: based on interviews with NATO officials. Université Catholique de Louvian.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J., 2018. Cyber security assemblages: a framework for understanding the dynamic and contested nature of security provision. Politics and governance, 6 (2), 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goede, M. and Simon, S., 2013. Governing future radicals in Europe. Antipode, 45 (2), 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demmers, J. and Gould, L., 2018. An assemblage approach to liquid warfare: AFRICOM and the ‘hunt’ for Joseph Kony. Security dialogue, 49 (5), 364–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Hooghe, I. and Lammertink, J., 2020. Towards sustainable Europe-China collaboration in higher education in research. Leiden: Leiden Asia Centre.
   Google Scholar
• D’Hooghe, I., et al., 2018. Assessing Europe-China collaborations in higher education and research. Leiden: Leiden Asia Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2016. European security as practice: EU–NATO communities of practice in the making? European security, 25 (4), 478–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, B. and de Kruif, I., 2019. Falend toezicht op Chinese militaire wetenschappers in Nederland. Nieuwsuur. Available from: https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2290313-falend-toezicht-op-chinese-militaire-wetenschappers-in-nederland [Accessed 15 Apr 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Hijink, M., 2020. Wetenschappers willen Huawei niet als sponsor AI-lab. NRC, 15 Oct.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E., 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15 (9), 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M. and Hoijtink, M., 2019. How (not) to talk about technology: international relations and the question of agency. In: Marijn Hoijtink and Matthias Leese, eds. Technology and agency in international relations. Routledge, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A., 2016. Speculative futures: cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and planning A, 48 (9), 1691–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T.M., 2007. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and society, 36 (2), 263–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, C., 2014. Of what is this a case?: analytical movements in qualitative social science research. Human organization, 73 (3), 224–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, B.O. and Ahmed, N., 2020. The security politics of innovation: dual-use technology in the EU’s security research programme. In: A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni, and C. Lavallée, eds. Emerging security technologies and EU governance: actors, practices, and processes. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 58–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., 2002. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minister of Justice and Security, 2019. Kamerbrief Nationale Veiligheid. The Hague: Ministry of Justice and Security.
   Google Scholar
• Minister of Justice and Security, Minister of Education Culture and Science, and Secretary of State for Economic Affairs, 2020. Kamerbrief: Kennisveiligheid hoger onderwijs en wetenschap. The Hague: Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, N., et al., 2021. Security challenges in the grey zone. In: M. Weissmann et al., eds. Hybrid warfare, security and asymmetric conflict in international relations. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Overly, S., and Heikkilä, M. 2021. China wants to dominate AI. The US and Europe need each other to tame it. Politico, 2 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, D., 2016. Governing dual-use knowledge: from the politics of responsible science to the ethicalization of security. Security dialogue, 47 (4), 310–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, D., 2020. Security meets science governance: the EU politics of dual-use research. In: A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni, and C. Lavallée, eds. Emerging security technologies and EU governance: actors, practices, and processes. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 164–174.
   Google Scholar
• Sweijs, T., et al., 2015. Assessing evolving concepts of security. The Hague: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands Enterprise Agency, 2020. Verkenning wetenschappelijke samenwerking Nederlandse en Chinese Kennisinstellingen. The Hague: The Netherlands Enterprise Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Topak, Ö.E., 2019. The authoritarian surveillant assemblage: authoritarian state surveillance in Turkey. Security dialogue, 50 (5), 454–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wende, M., et al., 2020. Introduction, China’s rise and the New Silk Road in global context. In: M. van der Wende et al., eds. China and Europe on the New Silk Road: connecting universities across Eurasia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• van Wijnen, J.F., 2020a. Amsterdamse universiteiten werken samen met omstreden techgigant Huawei. Het Financieel Dagblad, 25 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• van Wijnen, J.F., 2020b. Coalitiepartijen kritisch over ‘onwenselijke’ deal universiteiten met Huawei. Het Financieel Dagblad, 25 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• van Wijnen, J.F., 2020c. We gingen de deur uit met het idee: we hebben groen licht. Het Financieel Dagblad, 31 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Vennekens, A. and Demirel, B., 2021. De opkomst van China as R&D-supermacht. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut.
   Google Scholar