Cooperating to contrôle: French senators as defence overseers and civil-military actors

References

• Agence France Presse. 2019. French army deploys drone strike for first time in Mali operation. 23 December.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, David P, 2000. Disarmed democracies: domestic institutions and the use of force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, David P., and Saideman, Stephen M., 2014. NATO in Afghanistan: fighting together, fighting alone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auerswald, David P., Lagassé, Philippe, and Saideman, Stephen M. 2021. Less democratic oversight over militaries around the world than you’d expect: Understanding variations in the roles played by legislature in civil-military relations. Paper presented at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 6 December.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, Deborah D, 1994. Political institutions and military change: lessons from peripheral wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böller, Florian. 2021. Vandenberg vanished: US Congress and the politicisation of military interventions. Parliamentary Affairs (First View): 1-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, Hans, Wills, Aidan, and Buckland, Benjamin S. 2011. A comparative perspective of Ombudsman Institutions for the Armed Forces (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)).
   Google Scholar
• Born, Hans, and Hänggi, Heiner. 2005. The use of force under international auspices: strengthening parliamentary accountability (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces).
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Vincent, 2011. Le Sénat, Contre-pouvoir ou Bloc Majoritaire. Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 85 (1), 41–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Risa, 2019. Militaries and political activity in democracies. In: Suzanne C. Neilsen, and Don M. Snider, eds. American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a New Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 213–239.
   Google Scholar
• Cabirol, Michel. 2017. Mais que va faire le chef d’état-major des armées, le général Pierre de Villiers? La Tribune, 21 July.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C.C., and Auerswald, D.P., 2015. Congress and civil-military relations. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coticchia, Fabrizio, and Vignoli, Valerio, 2018. Italian political parties and military operations: an empirical analysis on voting patterns. Government and opposition, doi:10.1017/gov.2018.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coticchia, Fabrizio, and Moro, Francesco N., 2020. Peaceful legislatures? Parliament and military interventions after the cold War: insights from Germany and Italy. International relations, doi:10.1177/0047117819900250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cover, Oliver, and Meran, Sazan. 2013. Watchdogs: the quality of legislative oversight of defence in 82 Countries (Transparency International UK).
   Google Scholar
• Daho, Grégory, 2016. La transformation des armées: Enquête sur les relations civilo-militaires en France. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
   Google Scholar
• Daho, Grégory, 2019. A revenge of the generals. the rebalancing of the civil-military relations in France. Journal of intervention and statebuilding, 13 (3), 304–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, Pierre, 2017. Servir. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Dieterich, Sandra, Hummel, Hartwig, and Marschall, Stefan, 2015. Bringing democracy back in: the democratic peace, parliamentary war powers and European participation in the 2003 Iraq War. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (1), 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabre-Bernadac, Jean-Philippe. 2021. Pour un retour de l’honneur de nos gouvernments: 20 généraux appellent Macron à défendre le patriotisme. Valeurs Actuelles, 21 April.
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, Peter, 2003. Armed servants: agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge, Mass, London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonck, Daniel, and Reykers, Yf, 2018. Parliamentisation as a two-way process: explaining prior parliamentary consultation for military interventions. Parliamentary affairs, 71 (3), 674–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, Linda L, 2015. Watchdogs on the hill: the decline of congressional oversight of US foreign relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• France. 2013. Livre Blanc: Défense et securité nationale. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Gassilloud, Thomas. 2017. Avis sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2018 (n. 235), Défense, Préparation et emploi des forces: forces terrestres, 12 October.
   Google Scholar
• Gassilloud, Thomas. 2018. Avis sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2019 (n. 1955), Défense, Préparation et emploi des forces: forces terrestres, 12 October.
   Google Scholar
• Gautier, Jacques, et al. 2016. Interventions extérieurs de la France: renforcer l’efficacité military par une approache globale coordonnée, Rapport information no. 794, Commission des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armeés, 13 July.
   Google Scholar
• Gautier, Jacques, Reiner, Daniel, and Pintat, Xavier. 2015. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces, 19 November.
   Google Scholar
• Gautier, Jacques, Reiner, Daniel, and Pintat, Xavier. 2016. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces, 24 November.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, Jeanne, 2006. Legislatures and national defence: global comparisons. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim, 2017. NATO burden sharing in Libya: a fuzzy Set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of conflict resolution, 61 (10), 2235–2261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, Tim, 2018. Democratic participation in the air strikes against islamic state: a qualitative comparative analysis. Foreign policy analysis, 14 (2), 254–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikotani, Takako, 2018. The Japanese diet and defence policy-making. International affairs, 94, 791–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R., 2002. Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, Ariella, 2015. Executive privilege reaffirmed? Parliamentary scrutiny of the CFSP and CSDP. West European politics, 38 (2), 396–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joana, Jean, 2008. Armée et industrie de défense: cousinage nécessaire et liaison incestueuses. Pouvoirs, 125 (2), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, Juliet, and Kenealy, Daniel, 2016. No, prime minister: explaining the house of commons vote on intervention in Syria. European security, 25 (1), 28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, Juliet, and Kenealy, Daniel, 2017. Precedents, parliaments, and foreign policy: historical analogy in the house of commons vote on Syria. West European politics, 40 (1), 62–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagassé, Philippe, 2010. Accountability for national defence: ministerial responsibility, military command and parliamentary oversight. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lagassé, Philippe, and Saideman, Stephen, 2017. Public critic or secretive monitor: party objectives and legislative oversight of the military in Canada. West European politics, 40 (1), 119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagassé, Philippe, and Saideman, Stephen, 2019. When civilian control is civil: parliamentary oversight of the military in Belgium and New Zealand. European journal of international security, 4 (1), 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, Danielle L, 2017. Out of the service, into the house: military experience and congressional war oversight. Political research quarterly, 70, 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maire, Antoine, and Schmitt, Olivier, 2022. An unstable equilibrium: civil-military relations within the French ministry of defence. Journal of strategic studies. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2022.2127090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas, 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American journal of political science, 28, 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, Patrick, 2014. Democratic participation in armed conflict: military involvement in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Money, Jeannette, and Tsebelis, George, 1992. Cicero’s puzzle: upper house power in comparative politics. International political science review, 13 (1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morel, Benjamin, 2020. Variation in the role and impact of standing committees: the case of the French senate. Parliamentary affairs, 73 (4), 734–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann, Falk, 2017. France’s reluctant parliamentarization of military deployments. The 2008 constitutional reform in practice. West European politics, 40, 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, Cédric, and Conway-Mouret, Hélène. 2017. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces. 23 November.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, Cédric, and Conway-Mouret, Hélène. 2018. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces. 22 November.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, Cédric, and Conway-Mouret, Hélène. 2019. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces. 21 November.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, Cédric, and Conway-Mouret, Hélène. 2020. Rapport budgetaire: Équipement des forces. 19 November.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk, Wagner, Wolfgang, and Deitelhoff, Nicole, 2010. Parliaments and European security policy: mapping the parliamentary field. European integration online papers, 14 (1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk, and Wagner, Wolfgang, 2011. Between military efficiency and democratic legitimacy: mapping parliamentary War powers in contemporary democracies, 1989–2004. Parliamentary affairs, 64, 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk, and Wagner, Wolfgang, 2014. Executive privilege or parliamentary proviso? Exploring the sources of parliamentary War powers. Armed forces & society, 40 (2), 310–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzo di Borgo, Yves, and Demessine, Michelle. 2015. Rapport budgetaire: préparation et emploi des forces, 19 November.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzo di Borgo, Yves, and Demessine, Michelle. 2016. Rapport budgetaire: préparation et emploi des forces, 24 November.
   Google Scholar
• Raffarin, Jean-Pierre, and Reiner, Daniel. 2017. 2 pour cent du PIB: les moyens de la défense nationale, 24 May.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio, and Wagner, Wolfgang, 2017. Towards parliamentarisation of foreign and security policy? West European politics, 40 (1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio, and Wagner, Wolfgang, 2020. Party politics or (supra-)national interest? external relations votes in the European parliament. Foreign policy analysis, 16 (4), 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reykers, Yf, 2021. Strengthening parliamentary oversight of defence procurement: lessons from Belgium. European security, 30 (4), 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Davis R. B, 1969. Preparing for ulysses: politics and veterans during world War II. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roussellier, Nicholas, 2015. La Force de Gouverner: Le pouvoir exécutif en France, XIXe-XXIe siècles. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Meg, 2013. The contemporary house of lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakaki, Alexandra, and Lukner, Kerstin, 2017. Japan’s uncertain security environment and change in its legislative-executive relations. West European politics, 40 (1), 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Olivier, 2017. The reluctant atlanticist: France’s security and defence policy in a transatlantic context. Journal of strategic studies, 40 (4), 463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Paul, 2009. The senate of the French fifth republic. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, James, 2022. Did Theresa may kill the war powers convention? comparing parliamentary debates on UK intervention in Syria in 2013 and 2018. Parliamentary affairs, 75 (2), 400–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervé, Claire. 2017. ‘Je suis votre chef’: le recadrage d’Emmanuel Macron face à la grogne des militaires. Huffington Post France, 13 July.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, and Money, Jeannette, 1997. Bicameralism: the political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urvoas, Jean-Jacques, 2019. Le Sénat. Paris: Inédit.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, 2017. The Bundestag as a champion of parliamentary control of military missions. Sicherheit und frieden, 35, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, 2018. Is there a parliamentary peace? Parliamentary veto power and military interventions from Kosovo to Daesh. British journal of politics and international relations, 20 (1), 121–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, 2020. The democratic politics of military interventions: political parties, contestation, and decisions to use force abroad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, et al., 2017. The party politics of legislative-executive relations in security and defence policy. West European politics, 40 (1), 20–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, et al., 2018. Party politics at the water’s edge: contestation of military operations in Europe. European political science review, 10 (4), 537–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar