Improved conceptualising of hybrid interference below the threshold of armed conflict

References

• Ametbek, D., 2017. What is the necessity of military parades? Ankara Center for Crisis and Policy Studies (ANKASAM). Available from: https://www.ankasam.org/what-is-the-necessity-of-military-parades/?lang=en [Accessed 6 Mar 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Anna Vachudova, M., 2020. Ethnopopulism and democratic backsliding in Central Europe. East European politics, 36 (3), 318–340. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebaum, A., et al., 2017. “Make Germany great again” – Kremlin, alt-right and international influences in the 2017 German elections. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD). Available from: https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/make-germany-great-again-kremlin-alt-right-and-international-influences-in-the-2017-german-elections/.
   Google Scholar
• Banfield, E., 2003. Political influence. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News, 2017. How a cyber attack transformed Estonia. BBC News, 27 Apr. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/39655415 [Accessed 28 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• BBC News, 2019. In pictures: China shows off military might at 70th anniversary parade. BBC, 1 Oct. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-49891769 [Accessed 30 Sep 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Beadle, A.W., 2016. Å forske på Forsvaret i fremtiden – muligheter, begrensninger og kognitive fallgruver. Kjeller Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Report number 16/01810. Available from: https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/a-forske-pa-forsvaret-i-fremtiden-muligheter-begrensninger-og-kognitive-fallgruver.
   Google Scholar
• Bellows, A., 2020. Defending against the geopolitical weaponization of corruption. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24913.5 [Accessed 24 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Bentzen, N. and Service, E.E.P.R., 2020. Foreign interference in democracies: understanding the threat, and evolving responses. European Parliament Briefing.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., 2019. Social network centric warfare – understanding influence operations in social media. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Report number 19/01194. Available from: https://www.ffi.no/en/publications-archive/social-network-centric-warfare-understanding-influence-operations-in-social-media.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, A., 2020. Understanding influence operations in social media – a cyber kill chain approach. Journal of information warfare, 19 (4), 110–131. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.uio.no/stable/27033648.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, A., et al., 2020. Cognitive warfare: an attack on truth and thought. NATO, John Hopkins University. Available from: https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/Cognitive%20Warfare.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berzina, K. and Soula, E., 2020. Conceptualizing foreign interference in Europe: the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). Available from: https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Conceptualizing-Foreign-Interference-in-Europe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blockmans, S., 2021. Lithuania, China and EU lawfare to counter economic coercion – breaking bad? Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, No 2021/20/December 2021. Available from: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/lithuania-china-and-eu-lawfare-to-counter-economic-coercion/.
   Google Scholar
• Bukkvoll, T., et al., 2017. 10 år med Russisk forsvarsmodernisering. Kjeller Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Report number 17/16860. Available from: https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/10-ar-med-russisk-forsvarsmodernisering.
   Google Scholar
• Buvarp, P., 2023. The space of influence: developing a new method to conceptualise foreign influence in social media. Journal of information warfare, 22 (2), 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. and Hansen, L., 2009. The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary, n.d. interfere.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, D., 2017. Hybrid warfare: aggression and coercion in the gray zone | ASIL. American society of international law, 21 (14). Available from: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/21/issue/14/hybrid-warfare-aggression-and-coercion-gray-zone.
   Google Scholar
• Carment, D., 2021. War’s future: the risks and rewards of grey-zone conflict and hybrid warfare. Canadia Global Affairs Institute. Available from: https://www.cgai.ca/wars_future_the_risks_and_rewards_of_grey_zone_conflict_and_hybrid_warfare [Accessed 16 Sep 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, K., 2022. Size of Nord Stream blasts equal to large amount of explosive, UN told. The Guardian, 30 Sep 2022. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/30/nord-stream-blasts-size-equal-to-large-amount-of-explosive-un-told [Accessed 7 Nov 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Corera, G., 2020. Salisbury poisoning: what did the attack mean for the UK and Russia? BBC News, 4 Mar. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51722301.
   Google Scholar
• Cormac, R. and Aldrich, R.J., 2018. Grey is the new black: covert action and implausible deniability. International affairs, 94 (3), 477–494. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, P.J. and Reichborn-Kjennerud, E., 2017. MCDC countering hybrid warfare project: understanding hybrid warfare. A multinational capability development campaign project. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647776/dar_mcdc_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diesen, S., 2018. Lavintensivt hybridangrep på Norge i en fremtidig konflikt, FFI-rapport 18/00080.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K.M., 2021. COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group processes & intergroup relations, 24 (2), 270–275. doi:10.1177/1368430220982068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, C., 2017. Lawfare 101 a primer. Military review: Duke Law. Available from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6434&context=faculty_scholarship.
   Google Scholar
• Dyrendal, A. and Emberland, T., 2019. Hva er konspirasjonsteorier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2022a. Democracy index 2022: frontline democracy and the battle for Ukraine. London: The Economist.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2022b. The world’s most, and least, democratic countries in 2022. The Economist. Available from: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/02/01/the-worlds-most-and-least-democratic-countries-in-2022 [Accessed 14 Mar 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Egloff, F.J., 2020. Public attribution of cyber intrusions. Journal of cybersecurity, 6 (1), tyaa012. doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyaa012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellehuus, R., 2020. ‘Strange Birds in the Archipelago: Finland’s Legislation on Foreign Real Estate Investment’, CSIC.org. Available from: https://www.csis.org/blogs/kremlin-playbook-spotlight/strange-birds-archipelago-finlands-legislation-foreign-real-estate.
   Google Scholar
• EUvsDisinfo, 2023a. Deny, deflect, distract, confuse. Repeat. euvsdisinfo.eu. Available from: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/deny-deflect-distract-confuse-repeat/ [Accessed 28 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• EUvsDisinfo, 2023b. Disinfo: Ukraninan refugees smuggle weapons and bring crime to Europe. euvsdisinfo.eu. Available from: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/ukrainian-refugees-smuggle-weapons-and-bring-crime-to-europe [Accessed 28 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Ewers-Peters, N.M., 2022. Positioning member states in EU-NATO security cooperation: towards a typology. European security, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2076558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farer, T.J., 1985. Political and economic coercion in contemporary international law. The American journal of international law, 79, 405–413. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2201710.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, L.P. and Kirchgässner, G., 2000. Direct democracy, political culture, and the outcome of economic policy: a report on the Swiss experience. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Forsby, A.B. and Sverdrup-Thygeson, B., 2022. China’s coercive diplomacy: why it’s on the rise and what it means for Scandinavia. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 6. Available from: https://www.nupi.no/en/publications/cristin-pub/china-s-coercive-diplomacy-why-it-s-on-the-rise-and-what-it-means-for-scandinavia.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House, 2022. Change in freedom score. freedomhouse.org. Freedom House. Available from: https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fiw&year=2023&mapview=trend [Accessed 14 Mar 23].
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, A. and Klann, N.-H., 2013. Paying a visit: the Dalai Lama effect on international trade. Journal of international economics, 91 (1), 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A.L., 1994. Coercive diplomacy: definition and characteristics. In: A.L. George, et al., eds. The limits of coercive diplomacy, 7–11. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L. and Bennett, A., 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennendy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopoulos, G., Smith, H., and Theocharidou, M., 2021. The landscape of hybrid threats: a conceptual model. EUR 30585 EN.
   Google Scholar
• Gjørv, G.H., et al., 2022. De siviles rolle i sammensatt krigføring. In: G.F. Rongved and P.M. Norheim-Martinsen, eds. Totalforsvaret i praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal Forlag, 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, F., 2018. Corruption and lobbying: conceptual differentiation and gray areas. Crime, law and social change, 70 (2), 197–215. Doi:10.1007/s10611-017-9727-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government, Affairs, M.o.F., 2020. Cyber operation against the Parliament (Storting).
   Google Scholar
• Hadzhiev, B., 2020. Enablers of hybrid warfare: the Bulgarian case. Journal of international studies, 13 (1), 28–43.
   Google Scholar
• Halas, M., 2022. NATO’s sub-conventional deterrence: the case of Russian violations of the Estonian airspace. Contemporary security policy, 43 (2), 350–381. Doi:10.1080/13523260.2022.2028464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugsgjerd, A. and Segaard, S.B. 2020. Politisk tillit, lokaldemokrati og legitimitet. Kunnskapsstatus og utviklingstrekk. Rapport 2020:6.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2002. Political analysis – a critical introduction. Political analysis. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Helal, M., 2019. On coercion in international law. New York University Journal of International Law and politics (JILP), Ohio State Public Law Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hénin, N., 2021. Foreign election interferences: an overview of trends and challenges. EU Disinfo Lab. Available from: https://www.disinfo.eu/publications/foreign-election-interferences-an-overview-of-trends-and-challenges/ [Accessed 20 May 22].
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, A., 2018. Finnish soldiers find ‘secret Russian military bases’ after raiding mysterious island. The Independent, 1 Nov 2018. Available from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/finland-russia-military-bases-sakkiluoto-putin-dmitry-medvedev-police-a8612161.html [Accessed 3 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Q.E., 2018. Understanding and countering cyber coercion, NATO CCD Coe publications. Tallinn: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hodos, P.N., 2022. Playing to extremes: Russia’s choices to support western political extremists and paramilitary groups. International journal of intelligence and counterintelligence, 1–23. doi:10.1080/08850607.2022.2109449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F.G., 2009. Hybrid threats: reconceptualizing the evolving character of modern conflict. Institute for National Strategic Studies: National Defense University. Available from: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/98862/SF240.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F.G., 2010. ‘Hybrid threats’: neither omnipotent nor unbeatable. Orbis, 54 (3), 441–455.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, F.G., 2014. On not-so-new warfare: political warfare vs hybrid threats. War on the rocks. Available from: https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/on-not-so-new-warfare-political-warfare-vs-hybrid-threats/ [Accessed 16 Oct 2023]
   Google Scholar
• Huss, O. and Pozsgai-Alvarez, J., 2022. Strategic corruption as a threat to security and the new agenda for anti-corruption. corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org. Available from: https://www.corruptionjusticeandlegitimacy.org/post/strategic-corruption-as-a-threat-to-security-and-the-new-agenda-for-anti-corruption [Accessed 28 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Janičatová, S. and Mlejnková, P., 2021. The ambiguity of hybrid warfare: a qualitative content analysis of the United Kingdom’s political–military discourse on Russia’s hostile activities. London: Contemporary Security Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, I., 2018. Scenario modelling with morphological analysis. Technological forecasting & social change, 126, 116–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juurvee, I. and Arold, U., 2021. Psychological defence and cyber security: two integral parts of estonias comprehensive approach for countering hybrid threats. ICONO 14, 14 (19), 70–94. doi:10.7195/ri14.v19i1.1628.
   Google Scholar
• Juurvee, I. and Mattiisen, M., 2020. The bronze soldier crisis of 2007. Revisiting an early case of hybrid conflict. Tallinn: Internatioanl Centre for Defence and Security (RKK, ICDS). Available from: https://icds.ee/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ICDS_Report_The_Bronze_Soldier_Crises_of_2007_Juurvee_Mattiisen_August_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, G.H., 2019. Divide and rule: ten lessons about Russian political influence activities in Europe. Palgrave communications, 5 (1), 19. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0227-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kittrie, O.F., 2016. Lawfare: law as a weapon of war. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristian Åtland, T.N. and Pedersen, T., 2022. Military muscle-flexing as interstate communication: Russian NOTAM warnings off the coast of Norway, 2015–2021. Scandinavian journal of military studies, 5, 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, C. and Tucker, D., 2019. United States special operations forces. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S., 1968. Det politiske menneske. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D.L.L., 1992. Coercive cooperation: explaining multilateral economic sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M., 2018. Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: the emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European security, 27 (3), 374–392. doi:10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz Mosquera, A.B. and Bachmann, S.D., 2016. Lawfare in hybrid wars: the 21st century warfare. Journal of international humanitarian legal studies, 7 (1), 63–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, B., 2022. Decaying national security and the rise of imagined tribalism. The RUSI journal, 1–13. doi:10.1080/03071847.2022.2072763.
   Google Scholar
• NATO, 2022. NATO’s approach to space. nato.int. Available from: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_175419.htm [Accessed 16 Nov 2022].
   Google Scholar
• NIST, n.d.-a. Cyberspace. NIST: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available from: https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/cyberspace [Accessed 3 Jan 1 2022].
   Google Scholar
• NIST, n.d.-b. Information environment. NIST: U.S Department of Commerce. Available from: https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/information_environment [Accessed 3 Jan 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nutter, J.J., 2009. The CIA’s black ops: covert action, foreign policy, and democracy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D.A.R. 2015. Back to the future? Russia’s hybrid warfare, revolutions in military affairs, and Cold War comparisons. Research paper No. 120. Available from: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/194718/rp_120.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pelechrinis, K., Iliofotou, M., and Krishnamurthy, S.V., 2011. Denial of service attacks in wireless networks: the case of jammers. Ieee communications surveys & tutorials, 13 (2), 245–257. doi:10.1109/SURV.2011.041110.00022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., 2005. From fuzzy sets to crisp truth tables. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona. Available from: http://compasss.org/wpseries/Ragin2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. and Goodman, M.P., 2022. China’s economic coercion: lessons from Lithuania. csis.org. Available from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-economic-coercion-lessons-lithuania [Accessed 10 Nov 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T., 2013a. General morphological analysis. A general method for non-quantified modelling. Swedish Morphological Society. Available from: https://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Ritchey, T., 2013b. Wicked problems. Modelling social messes with morphological analysis. Acta morphologica generalis, 2, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. and Webber, M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4, 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron, A. and Singer, A.A., 2020. Democracy, corruption, and the ethics of business lobbying. Interest groups & advocacy, 9 (1), 38–56. doi:10.1057/s41309-019-00073-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T., 1962. Forword. In: R. Wohlstetter, ed. Pearl Harbor: warning and decision. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, vii–xi.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Michael N. 2012. ‘Attack’ as a Term of Art in International Law: The Cyber Operations Context. In 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, edited by C. Czosseck, R. Ottis and K. Ziolkowski, 283–94. NATO CCD COE Publications. https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2019/03/CyCon_book_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shires, J., 2020. Damaging the opponent ‘the new way’ – understanding the tactics behind hack-and-leak operations. Atlantisch perspectief, 44 (4), 20–25. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48600566.
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, N. and Bakke, E., 2019. Democratic backsliding in the European Union. Available from: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/77401/2/Democratic%2BBacksliding%2Bin%2Bthe%2BEuropean%2BUnion%2B10%2BMay%2B2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, C., 2017. Constraints on the soft power efforts of authoritarian states: the case of the 2015 military parade in Beijing. Journal of current Chinese affairs, 46 (2), 111–134. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177186810261704600205.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, D. and Whiteside, C., 2020. Blurred lines: gray-zone conflict and hybrid war – two failures of American strategic thinking. Naval war college review, 73 (4), 1–37. Available from: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8092&context=nwc-review.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, M., 2017. Covert action in the Age of social media. Georgetown journal of international affairs, 18 (2), 94–103. doi:10.1353/gia.2017.0024.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA, 1970. Declaration on principles of international law friendly relations and co-operation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. Resolution 2625. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170?ln=fr [Accessed 6 Mar 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Waage, K., et al., 2021. Økonomiske virkemidler for å oppnå strategiske mål – en oversikt. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Eksternnotat 21/00140. Available from: https://publications.ffi.no/nb/item/asset/dspace:7080/21-00140.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waage, K., et al., 2022. Kinesisk økonomisk statshåndverk og implikasjoner for norsk sikkerhet. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Report number 22/00422. Available from: https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/kinesisk-okonomisk-statshandverk-og-implikasjoner-for-norsk-sikkerhet.
   Google Scholar
• Waage, K., Kvalvik, S.N., and Lindgren, P.Y., 2021. Utenlandske investeringer og andre økonomiske virkemidler – når truer de nasjonal sikkerhet? Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Report number 20/03149. Available from: https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/utenlandske-investeringer-og-andre-okonomiske-virkemidler-nar-truer-de-nasjonal-sikkerhet.
   Google Scholar
• Waage, K. and Lindgren, P.Y., n.d. Økonomisk statshåndverk og nasjonale sikkerhetsinteresser: hvordan kan Kina true Norge? Article under production.
   Google Scholar
• Walentek, D., et al., 2021. Success of economic sanctions threats: coercion, information and commitment. International interactions, 47 (3), 417–448. doi:10.1080/03050629.2021.1860034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook, T., 2019. The global positioning system and military jamming geographies of electronic warfare. Journal of strategic security, 12 (2), 1–16. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26696257.
   Google Scholar
• Wigell, M., 2019. Hybrid interference as a wedge strategy: a theory of external interference in liberal democracy. International affairs, 95 (2), 255–275. doi:10.1093/ia/iiz018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigell, M., 2021. Democratic deterrence: how to dissuade hybrid interference. The Washington quarterly, 44 (1), 49–67. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2021.1893027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wither, J.K., 2016. Making sense of hybrid warfare. Connections, 15 (2), 73–87. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26326441.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmer, L.A., 2013. Covert coercion: a formal analysis of unconventional warfare as an interstate coercive policy option. Thesis. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34764.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S., and Henke, O., 2018. The salisbury poisoning case and German–Russian relations: ambiguity and ambivalence. The political quarterly, 89, 702–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicky, F., 1969. Discovery, invention, research through the morphological approach. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar