Rethinking representation: negotiating positionality, power and space in the field

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. 1986. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Lughod, L. 1988. “Fieldwork of a Dutiful Daughter.” In Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society, edited by S. Altorki, and C. Fawzi El-Solh, 139–161. New York: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J., K. Barry, and J. Esseveld. 1991. “Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist Research.” In Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as a Lived Research, edited by M. Margarate Fonow, and J. A. Cook, 133–153. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcalde, M. C. 2007. “Going Home: A Feminist Anthropologist's Reflections on the Dilemmas of Power and Positionality in the Field.” Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 7 (2): 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, R. In Press. “Empowerment Beyond Resistance: Cultural Ways of Negotiating Power Relations.” Women's Studies International Forum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.wsif.2013.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. 2006. “Analytical Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35 (4): 373–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou, eds. 2008. Doing Narrative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, L. 2001. “Inside Out: Narrative Autoethnography as a Path Toward Rapport.” Qualitative Inquiry 7: 504–518.
   Google Scholar
• Besio, K. 2005. “Telling Stories to Hear Autoethnography: Researching Women's Lives in Northern Pakistan.” Gender, Place and Culture 12 (3): 317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., and S. K. Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. New York: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. 1999. “Stages on Journeys: Some Remarks About Human Geography and Psycotherapeutic Practice.” The Professional Geographer 51 (1): 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. 2009. “Teaching Reflexivity: Undoing or Reinscribing Habits of Gender?” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (3): 327–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, D., and M. Walker. 2005. “Feminist Methodologies.” In Research Methods in the Social Sciences, edited by B. Somekg, and C. Lewin, 66–73. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaitin, J. 2004. “My Story, My Life, My Identity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 3 (4): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. 1999. The Ethnographic Self. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, A., and G. Knowles. 2001. Lives in Context: The Art of Life Histroy Research. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Gaitan, C. 1993. “Researching Change and Changing the Researcher.” Harvard Educational Review 63 (4): 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, N. L. 2004. “Positionality and the Pen: Reflections on the Process of Becoming a Feminist Researcher and Writer.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (6): 885–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2010. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12  Article 10 (1):
   Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. 1994. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research.” Professional Geographer 46 (1): 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enguix, B. 2012, 29 November. “Negotiating the Field: Rethinking Ethnographic Authority, Experience and the Frontiers of Research.” Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794112465635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppley, K. 2006. “Review Essay: David Weaver-Zercher (ed.) (2005). Writing the Amish: The Worlds of John A. Hostetler.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7 (3), Article 16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Essers, C. 2009. “Reflections on the Narrative Approach: Dilemmas of Power, Emotions, and Social Location While Constructing Life-Stories.” Organization 16: 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. 2010. Ethnograpghy Step-by-Step. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. 1984. “It's Great to Have Someone to Talk To: The Ethics and Politics of Interviewing Women.” In Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, edited by C. Bell, and H. Roberts, 70–87. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 1994. “Working with the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 70–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage/Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings by Michel Foucault, 1972–77. Translated by Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, M. 2002. “Feminism and Cross-Ideological Feminist Social Research: Standpoint, Situatedness, and Positionality – Developing Cross-Ideological Feminist Research.” Journal of International Women's Studies 3 (2): 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Santa Clara, CA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. 2008. Researching Social Life. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, K. 2011. “Tension in (Re) Presenting the Self in Reflexive Autoethnographic Research.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 6 (2): 134–149.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. 2005. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity and Autoethnographic Vignettes.” Qualitative Inquiry 11: 840–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanuha, V. K. 2000. “Being Native versus Going Native: Conducting Social Work Research as an Insider.” Social Work 45 (5): 439–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. 2003. “GPC Ten Years On: Is Self-Reflexivity Enough?” Gender, Place and Culture. 10 (4): 345–349.
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, D. 1986. “Dissolution and Reconsitution of Self: Implications for Anthropological Epistomology.” Cultural Anthropology 1 (1): 74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehnast, K. 2000. “Ethnographic Encounters in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Dilemmas of Gender, Poverty and the Cold War.” In Fieldwork Dilemmas: Anthropologist in Postcolonial States, edited by H. G. De Soto, and N. Dudwick, 100–118. London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, J. 1996. “Situating Locations: The Politics of Self, Identity and Other in Living and Writing the Text.” In Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, edited by D. Wolf, 185–214. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, J., and L. Lofland. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. London: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Luff, D. 1999. “Dialogue Across the Divides: ‘Moments of Rapport’ and Power in Feminist Research with Anti-Feminist Women.” Sociology 33 (4): 687–704.
   Google Scholar
• Michrina, B. P., and C. A. Richards. 1996. Person to Person: Fieldwork, Dialogue and the Hermeneutic Method. New York: Sunny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M. 1983. “Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research.” In Theories of Women's Studies, edited by G. Bowles, and R. D. Klein, 117–139. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P., ed. 2002. Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Motzafi-Haller, P. 1997. “Writing Birthright: On Native Anthropologists and the Politics of Representation.” In Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social, edited by D. E. Reed-Danahay, 195–222. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1981. “Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms?” In Doing Feminist Research, edited by H. Roberts, 30–61. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Obasi, C. 2012, 29 November. “Negotiating the Insider/Outsider Continua: A Black Female Hearing Perspective on Research with Deaf Women and Black Women.” Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794112465632.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, V. 1994. “Feminisms and Models of Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 158–174. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patai, D. 1994. “When Method Becomes Power.” In Power and Method, edited by A. Gitlen, 61–73. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A. 1994. “Practising Feminist Research: The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Research Process.” In Researching Women's Lives from a Feminist Perspective, edited by M. Maynard, and J. Purvis, 49–71. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. 2003. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Pini, B. 2004. “On Being a Nice Country Girl and an Academic Feminist: Using Reflexivity in Rural Social Research.” Journal of Rural Studies 20: 169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. 1995. “Narrative Configuration in Qualitative Analysis.” Qualitative Studies in Education 8 (1): 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Reed-Danahay, D. E., ed. 1997. Auto/Ethnography Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 1993. Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robben, A. C. G. M., and J. A. Sluka, eds. 2007. Ethnographical Fieldwork: An Anthropological Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1997. “Situating Knowledge: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2001. “Feminist Ethnography.” In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, 111–119. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, and L. Crossberg, 271–316. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. 1988. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography.” Women Studies International Forum 11 (1): 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6 (3): 374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, A. 2012, 16 May. “Reflexivity: Unmarried Japanese Male Interviewing Married Japanese Women About International Marriage.” Qualitative Research, doi:10.1177/1468794112442523.
   Google Scholar
• Thapar-Bjorkert, S., and M. Henry. 2004. “Reassessing the Research Relationship: Location, Position and Power in Fieldwork Accounts.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7 (5): 363–381.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 1999a. “Doing Household Research: Interviewing Couples Together and Apart.” Area 31 (1): 67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 1999b. “Being Seen and Heard? The Ethical Complexities of Working with Children and Young People at Home and School.” Philosophy & Geography 2 (2): 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villenas, S. 1996. “The Colonizer/Colonized Chicana Ethnographer: Identity, Marginalization, and Co-Optation in the Field.” Harvard Educational Review 4: 711–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, S. 2008. “Easier Said Than Done: Writing an Autoethnography.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (1): 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. L., ed. 1996. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar