Self-Determination After Kosovo

REFERENCES

• Ahtisaari, M. (2007) Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo's Future Status (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• Antonenko, O. (1999) ‘Russia, NATO and European Security after Kosovo’, Survival, 41, 4, pp. 124–44.
   Google Scholar
• Barnsley, I. & Bleiker, R. (2008) ‘Self-Determination: From Decolonization to Deterritorialization’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 20, 2, pp. 121–36.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, R. (2011) ‘The Birth of South Sudan and the Challenges of Statebuilding’, Ethnopolitics, 10, 3–4, pp. 411–29.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E. (2009) ‘Re-Examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from “Kosovo Syndrome”’, Geopolitics, 14, 2, pp. 219–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, E. & Toomla, R. (2009) ‘Forms of Normalisation in the Quest for De Facto Statehood’, The International Spectator, 44, 4, pp. 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, G. (1992) ‘Case for Self-Determination, The Kaplan Lecture on Human Rights’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 29, 223.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, K. (1999) ‘NATO's Republic: Warnings from Kosovo’, Civil Wars, 2, 3, pp. 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Borgen, C. J. (2009) ‘Language of Law and the Practice of Politics: Great Powers and the Rhetoric of Self-Determination in the Cases of Kosovo and South Ossetia, The Symposium: Great Power Politics’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 10, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Borgen, C. J. (2010) ‘From Kosovo to Catalonia: Separatism and Integration in Europe Current Developments in International Law’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2, 3, pp. 997–1033.
   Google Scholar
• Brilmayer, L. (1991) ‘Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation Essay’, Yale Journal of International Law, 16, 177.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. (1996) Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (1995) ‘Federalism, Secession, and the Morality of Inclusion Symposium: Issues in the Philosophy of Law’, Arizona Law Review, 37, 53.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N. (2009) ‘Playing the Recognition Game: External Actors and De Facto States’, The International Spectator, 44, 4, pp. 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Castellino, J. (2007) ‘Territorial Integrity and the Right to Self-Determination: An Examination of the Conceptual Tools’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 33, 503.
   Google Scholar
• Chandhoke, N. (2008) ‘Exploring the Right to Secession’, South Asia Research, 28, 1, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2002) ‘Kosovo and the Remaking of International Relations’, Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1, 4, pp. 110–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, S. (2000) ‘NATO's Response to the Kosovo Crisis’, Strategic Analysis, 24, 6, pp. 1143–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cismas, I. (2010) ‘Secession in Theory and Practice: The Case of Kosovo and Beyond’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2, 2, pp. 531–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cocozzelli, F. (2008) ‘Small Minorities in a Divided Polity: Turks, Bosniaks, Muslim Slavs and Roms, Ashkalis and Egyptians in Post-Conflict Kosovo’, Ethnopolitics, 7, 2–3, pp. 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Cocozzelli, F. (2009) ‘Critical Junctures and Local Agency: How Kosovo Became Independent’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9, 1–2, pp. 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. (2002) ‘Russia and NATO toward the Twenty-First Century: Conflicts and Peacekeeping in Boznia–Herzegovina and Kosovo’, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 15, 2, pp. 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Danspeckgruber, W. F. (2002) The Self-Determination of Peoples: Community, Nation, and State in an Interdependent World (Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner)
   Google Scholar
• Daskalovski, Z. (2008) ‘The Independence of Kosovo and the Consolidation of Macedonia—A Reason to Worry?’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 16, 2, pp. 267–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, R. (2009) ‘Twenty-First Century Self-Determination: Implications of the Kosovo Status Settlement for Tibet’, Arizona Journal of International Law and Competition Law, 26, 3, pp. 547–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fawn, R. (2008) ‘The Kosovo—and Montenegro—Effect’, International Affairs, 84, 2, pp. 269–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. & Laitin, D. D. (1999) ‘Weak States, Rough Terrain, and Large-Scale Ethnic Violence since 1945’, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (Atlanta, GA, American Political Science Association)
   Google Scholar
• Gallup Balkan Monitor (2010) Focus on Kosovo's Independence (Brussels, Gallup)
   Google Scholar
• Gerard Ong, G. (2003) ‘Credibility over Courage: NATO's Mis-Intervention in Kosovo’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26, 1, pp. 73–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. (2009) ‘The Stabilization and Association Process in the Western Balkans: An Effective Instrument of Post-Conflict Management?’, Ethnopolitics, 8, 3, pp. 325–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hannum, H. (1993) ‘Rethinking Self-Determination’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 34, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hannum, H. (1996) Sovereignty and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights (2nd edn) (Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hannum, H. (1998a) ‘Right of Self-Determination in the Twenty-First Century, The Symposium on the Future of International Human Rights’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 55, 3, pp. 773–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hannum, H. (1998b) ‘Specter of Secession—Responding to Claims for Ethnic Self-Determination, The Comment’, Foreign Affairs, 77, 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F. P. (2006) ‘Getting NATO's Success in Kosovo Right: The Theory and Logic of Counter-Coercion’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 23, 2, pp. 139–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrard, K. (2000) Devising an Adequate System of Minority Protection: Individual Human Rights, Minority Rights, and the Right to Self-Determination (London, Martinus Nijhoff)
   Google Scholar
• Herring, E. (2000) ‘From Rambouillet to the Kosovo Accords: NATO's War against Serbia and its Aftermath’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 4, 3–4, pp. 224–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. J., Wilkenfeld, J. & Gurr, T. R. (eds) (2008) Peace and Conflict (Boulder, CO, Paradigm Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Heymann, K. (2003) ‘Earned Sovereignty for Kashmir: The Legal Methodology to Avoiding a Nuclear Holocaust’, American University International Law Review, 19, 1, pp. 153–200.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. A. & Eastwood, L. S.Jr (1995) ‘What the Principle of Self-Determination Means Today Essay. Secession: State Practice and International Law after the Dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia Note’, ILSA Journal of International Law and Competition Law, 1, 119.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J. & Williams, P. R. (2003) ‘Earned Sovereignty: The Political Dimension’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 3, pp. 355–72.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. (1992) ‘Irredentas and Secessions: Adjacent Phenomena, Neglected Connections’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33, 1–2, pp. 18–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice (2010) Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (The Hague, International Court of Justice)
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, T. (2010) ‘A Case for Kosovo? Self-Determination and Secession in the 21st Century’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 15, 6, pp. 926–47.
   Google Scholar
• Jamar, H. & Vigness, M. K. (2010) ‘Applying Kosovo: Looking to Russia, China, Spain and beyond after the International Court of Justice Opinion on Unilateral Declarations of Independence Kosovo in the ICJ—The Case’, German Law Journal, 11, 7–8, pp. 913–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jenne, E., Saideman, S. M. & Lowe, W. (2007) ‘Separatism as a Bargaining Posture: The Role of Leverage in Minority Radicalization’, Journal of Peace Research, 44, 5, pp. 539–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, S. (2004) ‘Nato, the Kosovo War and Neoliberal Theory’, Contemporary Security Policy, 25, 2, pp. 252–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kemoklidze, N. (2009) ‘Kosovo Precedent and the Moral Hazard of Secession, The Special Issue: Borders and Boundaries: Secession in the 21st Century’, Journal of Law and International Relations, 5, 2, pp. 117–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009a) ‘From Autonomy to Independence: The Evolution of International Thinking on Kosovo, 1998–2005’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11, 2, pp. 141–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, J. (2009b) Kosovo: The Path to Contested Statehood in the Balkans (London, I.B. Tauris)
   Google Scholar
• King, C. (2008) ‘The Kosovo Precedent’, NewsNet: Newsletter of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, 48, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, N. P. (2007) ‘Making Bread from Broken Eggs: A Basic Recipe for Conflict Resolution Using Earned Sovereignty’, Whittier Law Review, 28, 4, pp. 1131–66.
   Google Scholar
• Klabbers, J. (2006) ‘Right to Be Taken Seriously: Self-Determination in International Law’, Human Rights Quarterly, 28, 1, pp. 186–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, B. (2007) ‘Kosovo's Endgame and Its Wider Implications in Public International Law Symposium: International Post-Conflict Governance’, in Klabbers, J., Creutz, K. & Wallendahl, A. (eds) (2007) Finnish Yearbook of International Law (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff)
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, B. (2008) The Legal Status of Territories Subject to Administration by International Organisations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, B. (2009) ‘Fuzzy Statehood: An International Legal Perspective on Kosovo's Declaration of Independence. A Theoretical Framework for Minority Protection Along New Trends of National and Public International Law’, Review of Central and Eastern European Law, 34, 4, pp. 361–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, P. (2006) ‘The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’, Journal of Peace Research, 43, 6, pp. 723–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozaryn, L. D. (1998) ‘United Nations, NATO Issue Warning on Kosovo’, American Forces Press Service, 24 September.
   Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C. (1990–1991) ‘The Unipolar Moment’, Foreign Affairs, 70, 1, pp. 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (2000) ‘Federalism and Secession: At Home and Abroad’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 13, 2, pp. 207–24.
   Google Scholar
• Laitin, D. (1998) Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Lauwers, G. & Smis, S. (2000) ‘New Dimensions of the Right to Self-Determination: A Study of the International Response to the Kosovo Crisis’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 6, 2, pp. 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Liotta, P. H. (2003) ‘Spillover Effect: Aftershocks in Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia’, European Security, 12, 1, pp. 82–108.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, S. (2008) ‘Rethinking the Boundaries of Democratic Secession: Liberalism, Nationalism, and the Right of Minorities to Self-Determination Constitutionalism in an Era of Globalization and Privatization: II. Fundamental Rights in Light of Globalization and Privatization: A. Rights at the Intersection of International, Transnational, and Private Legal Regimes’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6, 3–4, pp. 553–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2000) ‘Ethics of Secession and a Normative Theory of Nationalism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 13, 2, pp. 225–50.
   Google Scholar
• Muharremi, R. (2008) ‘Kosovo's Declaration of Independence: Self-Determination and Sovereignty Revisited. Special Issue: Kosovo’, Review of Central and Eastern European Law, 33, 4, pp. 401–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushkat, M. (1972) ‘The Process of Decolonisation: International Legal Aspects’, Baltimore Law Review, 2, 1, pp. 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, V. P. (1996) ‘Revisiting Self-Determination as an International Law Concept: A Major Challenge in the Post-Cold War Era. The New Dynamics of Self-Determination’, ILSA Journal of International and Competition Law, 3, 2, pp. 443–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, Z. & Megiddo, T. (2009) ‘Lessons from Kosovo: The Law of Statehood and Palestinian Unilateral Independence. Special Issue: Borders and Boundaries: Secession in the 21st Century’, Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5, 2, pp. 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C. A. (2009) ‘The Kosovo Precedent and the Rhetorical Deployment of Former Yugoslav Analogies in the Cases of Abkhazia and South Ossetia’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9, 1–2, pp. 171–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, B. (2007) ‘Analysing Partition: Definition, Classification and Explanation’, Political Geography, 26, 8, pp. 886–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavkovic, A. & Radan, P. (2003) ‘In Pursuit of Sovereignty and Self-Determination: Peoples, States and Secession in the International Order Theme: Self-Determination, Secession and the Creation of States’, Macquarie Law Journal, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, D. (2008) ‘Self-Determination Movements and Their Outcomes’, in Hewitt, J. J., Wilkenfeld, J. & Gurr, T. R. (eds) (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Radan, P. (2012) ‘Secessionist Referenda in International and Domestic Law’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 18, 1, pp. 8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, N. (2008) ‘Breaking Up Doesn't Have to Be So Hard: Default Rules for Partition and Secession Comment’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 9, 2, pp. 685–718.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (1999) ‘NATO's “Humanitarian War” over Kosovo’, Survival, 41, 3, pp. 102–23.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, B. R. (2011) ‘New Developments in Public International Law: Statehood, Self-Determination, and Secession Roundtable’, NTU Law Review, 6, 2, pp. 639–72.
   Google Scholar
• Saideman, S. M. & Ayres, R. W. (2000) ‘Determining the Causes of Irredentism: Logit Analyses of Minorities at Risk Data from the 1980s and 1990s’, Journal of Politics, 62, 4, pp. 1126–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N. (2000) ‘Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature’, World Politics, 52, 4, pp. 437–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, M., Ryngaert, C. & Griffioen, C. (2011) ‘Normative Status of Self-Determination in International Law: A Formula for Uncertainty in the Scope and Content of the Right, The Relevance of the Right to Self-Determination in the Kosovo Matter: In Partial Response to the Agora Papers, The Agora: Kosovo (Part 3)’, Human Rights Law Review, 11, 4, pp. 609–44.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, M. P. (2003) ‘Earned Sovereignty: The Juridical Underpinnings’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 3, pp. 373–85.
   Google Scholar
• Seshagiri, L. (2010) ‘Democratic Disobedience: Reconceiving Self-Determination and Secession at International Law Note’, Harvard International Law Journal, 51, 2, pp. 553–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, S. G. (2005) ‘Addressing Ethnic Divisions in Post-Conflict Institution-Building: Lessons from Recent Cases’, Security Dialogue, 36, 3, pp. 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanova, R. (2003) ‘New Security Challenges in the Balkans’, Security Dialogue, 34, 2, pp. 169–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterio, M. (2010) ‘On the Right to External Self-Determination: Selfistans, Secession, and the Great Powers' Rule’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 19, 1, pp. 137–76.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. J. (2005) ‘Right of Self-Determination and Nationalism in International Law’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 12, 4, pp. 325–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tancredi, A. (2008) ‘Neither Authorized nor Prohibited—Secession and International Law after Kosovo, South Ossetia and Abkhazia’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 18, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Tir, J. (2002) ‘Letting Secessionists Have Their Way: Can Partitions Help End and Prevent Ethnic Conflicts?’, International Interactions, 28, 3, pp. 261–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toft, M. D. (2003) The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests and the Indivisibility of Territory (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Toft, M. D. & Saideman, S. M. (2010) ‘Self-determination Movements and Their Outcomes’, in Hewitt, J. J., Wilkenfeld, J. & Gurr, T. R. (eds) (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Troebst, S. (1998) Conflict in Kosovo: Failure of Prevention? An Analytical Documentation, 1992–1998 (Flensburg, European Centre for Minority Issues)
   Google Scholar
• Tziampiris, A. (2005) ‘Kosovo's Future Sovereignty: A Role for the European Union’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 5, 2, pp. 285–99.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations (San Francisco, CA, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly (1960) Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General (2007) Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement. Addendum to the Letter dated 26 March 2007 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council (New York, United Nations Security Council)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council (1992) Resolution 777 (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council (1998a) Resolution 1160 (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council (1998b) Resolution 1199 (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council (1999) Resolution 1244 (New York, United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• Vidmar, J. (2009) ‘International Legal Responses to Kosovo's Declaration of Independence’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 3, pp. 779–851.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G. & Bolton, G. (2011) ‘The Complex Nature and Implications of International Engagement after Kosovo's Independence’, Civil Wars, 13, 2, pp. 189–214.
   Google Scholar
• Weidmann, N. B., Rød, J. C. & Cederman, L. (2010) ‘Representing Ethnic Groups in Space: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research, 47, 4, pp. 491–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (1999) ‘The Rambouillet Conference on Kosovo’, International Affairs, 75, 2, pp. 211–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2005) ‘The Self-Determination Trap’, Ethnopolitics, 4, 1, pp. 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2008a) Escaping the Self-Determination Trap (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff)
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2008b) ‘Settling Self-Determination Conflicts: An Introduction’, in Weller, M. & Metzger, B. (eds), pp. xi–xvii), (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2009a) Contested Statehood. Kosovo's Struggle for Independence (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2009b) ‘Settling Self-Determination Conflicts: Recent Developments’, European Journal of International Law, 20, 1, pp. 111–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, M. & Metzger, B. (eds) (2008) Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power Sharing in Theory and Practice (Leiden & Boston, MA, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, N. J. (2000) ‘Reflections on the Legality and Legitimacy of NATO's Intervention in Kosovo’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 4, 3–4, pp. 144–63.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. R. (2003) ‘Earned Sovereignty: The Road to Resolving the Conflict Over Kosovo's Final Status’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 3, pp. 387–425.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. R. & Heymann, K. (2004) ‘Earned Sovereignty: An Emerging Conflict Resolution Approach’, ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 10, 2, pp. 437–45.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. R., Hooper, J. & Scharf, M. P. (2003) ‘Resolving Sovereignty Based Conflicts: The Emerging Approach of Earned Sovereignty’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 31, 3, pp. 349–53.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. R. & Pecci, F. J. (2004) ‘Earned Sovereignty: Bridging the Gap between Sovereignty and Self-Determination’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 40, 2, pp. 347–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A. & Feinstein, Y. (2010) ‘The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001’, American Sociological Review, 75, 5, pp. 764–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2001) ‘“Bilateral” Ethnopolitics after the Cold War: The Hungarian Minority in Slovakia, 1989–1999’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 2, 2, pp. 159–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2003) ‘The Limits of Non-Military International Intervention: A Case Study of the Kosovo Conflict’, in Bieber, F. & Daskalovski, Z. (eds) (2003)Understanding the War in Kosovo (London, Frank Cass), pp. 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2011a) ‘Consociationalism: Power Sharing and Self-Governance’, in Wolff, S. & Yakinthou, C. (eds) (2011)Conflict Management in Divided Societies: Theories and Practice (London, Routledge), pp. 23–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2011b) ‘Managing Ethno-National Conflict: Towards an Analytical Framework’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 49, 2, pp. 162–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2011c) ‘A Resolvable Frozen Conflict? Designing a Settlement for Transnistria’, Nationalities Papers, 39, 6, pp. 863–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. & Weller, M. (2005) ‘Self-Determination and Autonomy: A Conceptual Introduction’, in Weller, M. & Wolff, S. (eds) (2005) Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies (London, Routledge), pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yesson, E. (1999) ‘NATO and Russia in Kosovo’, The RUSI Journal, 144, 4, pp. 20–6.
   Google Scholar