Quo Vadis Judicial Reforms? The Quest for Judicial Independence in Central and Eastern Europe

REFERENCES

• Ajani, G. (1994) ‘La circulation de modèles juridiques dans le droit post-communiste’, Revue internationale de droit comparé, 46, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandru, I. (2004) Politicã, administraţie, justiţie (Bucharest, Editions All Beck)
   Google Scholar
• Asiedu, D. (2005) ‘Justice Ministry Examining Communist Past of Judges’, Radio Prague, 15 August, available at: http://www.radio.cz/en/section/talking/justice-ministry-examining-communist-past-of-judges, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. D. (2012) ‘A Europe of Values and Principles’, Speech 12/16, delivered at the Plenary debate on the situation in Hungary, Strasbourg, 18 January, available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-16_en.htm, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, A. (2004) ‘Romania Hits Back at Critics’, EU Observer, 5 February, available at: http://euobserver.com/enlargement/14341, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. & Castiglione, D. (2003) ‘Legitimizing the Euro-Policy and its Regime: the Normative Turn in EU Studies’, European Journal of Political Theory, 2, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bill Chavez, R. (2010) ‘The Quest for Justice in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, 52, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobek, M. (2007) ‘Iudex Ex Machina: Institutional and Mental Transitions of Central and Eastern European Judiciairies’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. (eds) (2007)Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries (Baden-Baden, Vanden Broele)
   Google Scholar
• Bodnar, A. (2010) ‘Poland: EU Driven Democracy?’, in Morlino, L. & Sadurski, W. (eds) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European Post-Communist Countries (New York, Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Bodnar, A. & Bojarski, L. (2011) ‘Judicial Independence in Poland’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.) Judicial Independence in Transition (New York, Dordrecht & London, Springer)
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. & Risse, Th. (2000) ‘When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change’, European Integration online Papers, 4, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. & Risse, Th. (2012) ‘From Europeanization to Diffusion: Introduction’, West European Politics, 35, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusis, M. (2005) ‘European Union Enlargement and the Europeanisation of Eastern Europe: Research Puzzles and Policy Issues’, in Mansfeldova, Z., Sparschuh, V. & Wenninger, A. (eds) Patterns of Europeanisation in Central and Eastern Europe (Hamburg, Krämer Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. (2007) ‘Government Unveils Ambitious Reform of Justice System’, Radio Prague, 20 November, available at: http://www.radio.cz/en/section/curraffrs/government-unveils-ambitious-reform-of-justice-system, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. (2007) ‘Media, Justice and Politics or How the Independence of the Judiciary Became an Issue on the Romanian Political Agenda’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. (2008) La carrier publique de la consolidation des garanties d'indépendance de la justice. Un phénomène social et politique dans la Roumanie post-communiste (Brussels, Université libre de Bruxelles)
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. (2009) Réformer la justice dans un pays post-communiste. Le cas de la Roumanie (Brussels, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles)
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. & De Waele, J. (eds) (2007) Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries (Baden-Baden, Van Broele)
   Google Scholar
• Coman, R. & Dallara, C. (eds) (2010) Handbook of Judicial Politics (Iasi, Editura Institutul European)
   Google Scholar
• Commission européenne (2001) ‘Rapport régulier 2001 sur les progrès réalisés sur la Bulgarie sur la voie de l'adhésion’, SEC(2001) 1744, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2001/bu_en.pdf, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Commission européenne (2002) ‘Rapport régulier 2002 sur les progrès réalisés par la Bulgarie sur la voie de l'adhésion’, SEC(2002), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2002/bu_fr.pdf, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dallara, C. (2007) ‘Challenges to the Democratic Judicial Reform in Serbia: Legacy of the Past, Political Actors Interests and the EU Vagueness’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. M. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Dallara, C. (2008) ‘Serbia: Borderline Democracy?’, in Morlino, L. & Magen, A. (eds) International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law: Anchoring Democracy? (Abingdon, Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Decean, M. (2006) Mãrturiile unui naiv corigibil sau singur printre securişti (Timişoara, Editions BrumaR)
   Google Scholar
• Delpeuch, T. (2000) ‘Le système pénal bulgare: un Etat de droit bricolé avec des éléments d'Etat policier’, Les Cahiers de la sécurité intérieure, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Delpeuch, T. (2006) ‘La coopération internationale dans les domaines du droit et de la justice au prisme du courant de recherche “droit et développement”’, Droit et Société, 62.
   Google Scholar
• Delpeuch, T. (2007) ‘Evaluation of Sociological Critiques of International Legal Reforms Transfers Based on an Analysis of American Judicial Assistance in Bulgaria’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. M. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Di Federico, G. (2010) ‘Political Relevance, Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary’, in Coman, R. & Dallara, C. (eds) Handbook on Judicial Politics (Iasi, Editura Institutul European)
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, P. (1999) ‘Judicial Independence and Judicial Reforms in Latin America’, in Schedler, A., Diamond, L. & Plattner, M. F. (eds) The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner Publisher Inc.)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2000) ‘Regular Report from the Commission on Bulgaria's Progress towards Accession’, 8 November, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2000/bg_en.pdf, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001) ‘Regular Report from the Commission on Hungary's Progress towards Accession’, SEC(2001) 1748, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2001/hu_en.pdf, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2002) ‘Regular Report from the Commission on Hungary's Progress towards Accession’, SEC(2002) 1404, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2002/hu_en.pdf, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2003) ‘Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Hungary's Preparations for Membership’, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/cmr_hu_final_en.pdf, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Romania: Technical Report, Commission Staff Working Document, COM(2012)410 final, 18 July, p. 25, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/cvm/docs/swd_2012_231_en.pdf, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission for Democracy through Law (2011) ‘Opinion on the New Constitution of Hungary Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 87th Plenary Session, Venice, 17–18 June 2011’, opinion 621/2011, available at: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2011)016-E.aspx, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission for Democracy through Law (2012) ‘Opinion on Act CLXII of 2011 on the Legal Status and Remuneration of Judges and Act CLXI of 2011 on the Organisation and Administration of Courts of Hungary, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 90th Plenary Session, Venice, 16–17 March 2012’, opinion 663/2012, available at: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2012)001-e.aspx, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2004) ‘Report on Romania's Progress towards Accession’, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy COM(2003) 676-C5-0534/2003-2003/2203(INI), 24 February, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef = -//EP//NONSGML+TA+P5-TA-2004-0182+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN, accessed 18 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011) ‘Debates of the European Parliament’, 19 January, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef = -//EP//NONSGML+CRE+20110119+SIT+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language = EN, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2012) ‘Recent Political Developments in Hungary (Debates)’, 18 January, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef = -//EP//TEXT+CRE+20120118+ITEM-021+DOC+XML+V0//EN, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T. & Radaelli, C. (2009) ‘Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanisation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T. & Radaelli, C. (eds) (2012) Research Design in European Studies. Establishing Causality in Europeanization (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Febbrajo, A. (2010) ‘Legal Cultures in Transition: A System-theory Approach’, in Febbrajo, A. & Sadurski, W. (eds) Central and Eastern Europe after Transition. Towards a New Socio-legal Semantics (Farnham, Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, Z. (2011) ‘Judicial Independence in Hungary’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B. (2004) ‘History, Politics and Judicial Independence’, in Andras, S. (ed.) Judicial Integrity (Leiden & Boston, MA, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Ganev, V. (2003) ‘The Bulgarian Constitutional Court, 1991–1997: A Success Story in Context’, Europe-Asia Studies, 55, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlicki, L. (2002) ‘The Experience of the Polish Constitutional Court’, in Sadurski, W. (ed.) Constitutional Justice, East and West (Dordrecht, Kluwer)
   Google Scholar
• Ghinea, C. & Stefan, L. (eds) (2011) EU Approach to Justice in Southeastern and Eastern Europe (Bucharest, Romanian Center for European Policies).
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. (2001) ‘Making Sense of Post-communist Central Administration: Modernisation, Europeanisation or Latinisation?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2001) ‘How does Europeanisation affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2002) ‘European Union Conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire’, International Political Science Review, 23, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2004) ‘What the New Member States Bring into the European Union’, in Nugent, N. (ed.) European Union Enlargement (Basingstoke, Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. & Taylor, R. (1997) ‘La science politique et les trois néo-institutionnalismes’, Revue française de science politique, 47, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerslev, O. (2007) ‘Reform Strategies around the Bulgarian Judicial Branch: Social Struggles Converted into Struggles about Court Reforms’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. M. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Hammerslev, O. (2011) ‘The European Union and the United States in Eastern Europe: Two Ways of Exporting Law, Expertise and State Power’, in Dezalay, Y. & Garth, B. G. (eds) Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization (London, Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T. (2007) ‘When Does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe’, Political Studies Review, 5, 2.
   Google Scholar
• International Bar Association, Human Rights Institute/Council of Bars & Law Societies of Europe (2007) ‘Justice Under Siege: A Report on the Rule of Law in Poland’, available at: http://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/NTCdocument/newsletter_20_enpdf1_1209980014.pdf, accessed 18 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. (2011) ‘Europeanisation by Decree? The Case of Police Reform in Bosnia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenov, D. (2004) ‘Behind the Copenhagen Façade. The Meaning and the Structure of the Copenhagen Political Criterion of Democracy and the Rule of Law’, European Integration online Papers, 8, 10, available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-010.pdf, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kosar, D. (2010a) ‘Judicial Accountability in the (Post)Transitional Context: A Story of the Czech Republic’, in Czarnota, A. & Parmentier, S. (eds) (2010)Transitional Justice, Rule of Law and Institutional Design (Antwerp, Intersentia Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Kosar, D. (2010b) ‘Judicial Accountability and Democratic Transition: Visegrad Story’, paper presented at the 8th World Congress of Constitutional Law, Mexico City, December, available at: http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/16/288.pdf, accessed 18 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, Z. (2004) ‘Worlds Apart: Western and Central European Judicial Culture at the Onset of the European Enlargement’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 52, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkins, C. M. (1996) ‘Judicial Independence and Democratisation: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhaes, P. C. (1999) ‘The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe’, Comparative Politics, 32, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelski, M. (2012) ‘EU-driven judicial reforms in Romania: A Success Story?’, East European Politics, 28, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Melone, A. P. (1996) ‘The Struggle for Judicial Independence and Transition Toward Democracy in Bulgaria’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2004) ‘“Good” and “Bad” Democracies: How to Conduct Research into the Quality of Democracy’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2009) ‘Qualities of Democracy: How to Analyze Them’, Studies in Public Policy, 465.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. & Sadurski, W. (eds) (2010) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European Post-Communist Countries (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Nalepa, M. (2010) Skeletons in the Closet. Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• OSI (2001) Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Judicial Independence (Budapest, Open Society Institute)
   Google Scholar
• OSI(2002) Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Minority Protection (Budapest, Open Society Institute)
   Google Scholar
• Palier, B. & Surel, Y. (eds) (2007) L'Europe en action. L'européanisation dans une perspective comparée (Paris, L'Harmattan)
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D. & Phinnemore, D. (2004) ‘Europeanization, Conditionality and Domestic Change: The Twinning Exercise and Administrative Reform in Romania’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parau, C. (2011) ‘The Drive for Judicial Supremacy’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.)
   Google Scholar
• Pederzoli, P. & Piana, D. (2010) ‘The Governance of the Judicial Systems in Europe’, in Coman, R. & Dallara, C. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Peter, J. (1998) Analysing Public Policy (London, Continuum)
   Google Scholar
• Piana, D. (2007a) ‘Judges and Legal Experts in the European Policy of the Rule of Law Promotion’, in Coman, R. & De Waele, J. M. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Piana, D. (2007b) ‘Unpacking Policy Transfer, Discovering Actors: The French Model of Judicial Education Between Enlargement and Judicial Cooperation in the EU’, French Politics, 5, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Piana, D. (2009) ‘Building Capacities Abroad to Solve Conflicts at Home. Preliminary Remarks on the European Policy of Legal Education and Judicial Training in CEECs’, Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 1, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Piana, D. (2010) Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice (Burlington, Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Pogany, I. (1993) ‘Constitutional Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary's Transition to Democracy’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 42, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. (2006) ‘Assessing Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe: The European Dimension’, Acta Politica, 41, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primatarova, A. (2011) ‘Country Report Bulgaria’, in Ghinea, S. & Stefan, L. (eds) The EU Approach to Justice Reform in Southeastern and Eastern Europe (Bucharest, Centrul Roman de Politici Europene)
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. & Pasquier, R. (2008) ‘Conceptual issues’, in Graziano, P. & Vink, M. P. (eds) Europeanization. New Research Agendas (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. & Saurugger, S. (2008) ‘The Europeanization of Public Policies: Introduction’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (2006) ‘Religion, Constitutional Courts, and Democracy in Former Communist Countries’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, J. (2011) ‘Top Courts Enable Inquiry into Judges’ Communist Past’, Radio Prague, 10 January, available at: http://www.radio.cz/en/section/curraffrs/top-court-enables-inquiry-into-judges-communist-past, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2005) ‘The Quality of Democracy’, Comparative Politics, 37, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajo, A. (1995) ‘Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. (2006) ‘The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU's Eastern Neighbours’, Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2003) ‘Constitutional Negotiations: Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe’, International Sociology, 18, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2006) ‘Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Europe’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. & Sedelmeier, U. (2004) ‘Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. (2004) ‘The Quality of Democracy. The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability’, Journal of Democracy, 15, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfelder, B. (2005) ‘Judicial Independence in Bulgaria: A Tale of Splendour and Misery’, Europe-Asia Studies, 57, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.) (2011) Judicial Independence in Transition (New York, Dordrecht & London, Springer)
   Google Scholar
• Seleny, A. (1999) ‘Old Political Rationalities and New Democracies: Compromise and Confrontation in Hungary and Poland’, World Politics, 51, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilov, D. (2010) ‘Bulgaria: Discontents and Frustrations of a Newly-Consolidated Democracy’, in Morlino, L. & Sadurski, W. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. C. (2008) ‘Models of Judicial Administration and the Independence of the Judiciary: A Comparison of Romanian Self-management and the Czech Executive Model’, Public Administration and Development, 28, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sticka, M. (2007) ‘Top-down Control Slows Czech Judicial Reform, Despite EU Impetus’, in Transparency International, Global Corruption Report, available at: http://www.google.be/url?sa = t&rct = j&q = &esrc = s&source = web&cd = 3&ved = 0CEEQFjAC&url = http%3A%2F%2Fwww.u4.no%2Frecommended-reading%2Fglobal-corruption-report-corruption-and-judicial-systems%2Fdownloadasset%2F2353&ei = pnEDU8KhILLOyAPmkoHwDA&usg = AFQjCNHADPja6VV95UU3p3p3qqOmygj6Kw&bvm = bv.61535280,d.bGQ, accessed 18 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Uitz, R. (2007) ‘Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe: What Makes a Question too Political?’, Juridica International, 13, 2, available at: http://www.juridica.ee/juridica_en.php?document=en/international/2007/2/132526.PRN.pub.php, accessed 1 March 2014
   Google Scholar
• Uitz, R. (2010) ‘Hungary: High Hopes Revisited’, in Morlino, L. & Sadurski, W. (eds)
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K. (2004) The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania (Ithaca, NY, & London, Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Voermans, W. & Albers, P. (2003) Councils for the Judiciary in EU Countries, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/textes/CouncilOfJusticeEurope_en.pdf, accessed 19 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2012) ‘Fighting for Respect of Democracy in Hungary =  Fighting for Respect of Democracy in EU’, 18 January, available at: http://www.renateweber.eu/en/detalii_media/389, accessed 18 February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wiatr, J. (1997) ‘Poland's Three Parliaments in the Era of Transition, 1989–1995’, International Political Science Review, 18, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K. (2007) ‘Constitutional Politics’, in White, S., Batt, J. & Lewis, P. G. (eds) Developments in Central and East European Politics (Basingstoke, Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Woll, C. & Jacquot, S. (2004) Les usages de l'Europe: acteurs et transformations européennes (Paris, L'Harmattan)
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. & Hilbink, L. (2009) ‘Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests’, Political Research Quarterly, 62, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocka, O. (2009) ‘Populism in Poland: In/visible Exclusion’, Institute for Human Sciences, available at: http://www.iwm.at/publications/junior-visiting-fellows-conferences/vol-xxvi/populism-in-poland/, accessed 18 January 2014.
   Google Scholar