The Imperial Dimension of Russian Modernisation: A Multiple Modernities Perspective

References

• Arnason, J. P. (1993) The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (1995) ‘The Soviet Model as a Mode of Globalisation’, Thesis Eleven, 41, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (2002) ‘Communism and Modernity’, in Eisenstadt, S. (ed.) Multiple Modernities (London, Transaction Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (2003a) Civilisations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions (Leiden, Brill).
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (2003b) ‘Entangled Communisms: Imperial Revolutions in Russia and China’, European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (2010) ‘The Cultural Turn and the Civilisational Approach’, European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettiza, G. (2014) ‘Civilisational Analysis in International Relations: Mapping the Field and Advancing a “Civilisational Politics” Line of Research’, International Studies Review, 16, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2010) ‘Confrontations with Modernity: Openness and Closure of the Other Europe’, Eurozine Online, available at: www.eurozine.com/articles/2010-06-15-blokker-en.html, accessed 25 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, S. (1992) ‘Soviet Communism and Weberian Sociology’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 5, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2002) ‘The End of the Transition Paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1986) Weberian Sociological Theory (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• David-Fox, M. (2006) ‘Multiple Modernities vs. Neo-Traditionalism: On Recent Debates in Russian and Soviet History’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 54, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin, B. (2011) Rossiya nulevykh: politicheskaya kul’tura, istoricheskaya pamyat’, povsednevnaya zhizn’ (Moscow, ROSSPEN).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. (1963) The Political Systems of Empires (New York, NY, The Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. (1999) Fundamentalism, Sectarianism and Revolution: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. (2002) ‘Multiple Modernities’, in Eisenstadt, S. (ed.) Multiple Modernities (London, Transaction Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. (2003) Comparative Civilisations and Multiple Modernities, vol. 1–2 (Leiden, Brill).
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G. (2015) ‘Three Generations of Research on Post-Communist Politics—A Sketch’, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 29, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. (2000) ‘Introduction’, in Fitzpatrick, S. (ed.) Stalinism: New Directions (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M. & Bowen, A. (2014) ‘Putin’s Empire of the Mind: How Russia’s President Morphed from Realist to Ideologue—and What He’ll Do Next’, Foreign Policy, May–June.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1985) The Nation-State and Violence (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gudkov, L. (2009) ‘Priroda putinizma’, Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya: Dannye, analiz, diskussii, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gudkov, L. (2011) Abortivnaya modernizatsiya (Moscow, ROSSPEN).
   Google Scholar
• Gudkov, L. (2014) ‘Ressentimentnyi natsionalizm’, Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya: Dannye, analiz, diskussi, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S. (2010) Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany and Post-Soviet Russia (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hassner, P. (2008) ‘Russia’s Transition to Autocracy’, Journal of Democracy, 19, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedin, A. (2004) ‘Stalinism as a Civilisation: New Perspectives on Communist Regimes’, Political Studies Review, 2, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Istoriya (1938) Istoriya Vsesoyuznoi kommunisticheskoi partii (bol’shevikov): kratkii kurs (Moscow, OGIZ).
   Google Scholar
• Jowitt, K. (1992) New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kappeler, A. (2014) ‘Ukraine and Russia: Legacies of the Imperial Past and Competing Memories’, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (2010) ‘A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilisations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices’, in Katzenstein, P. (ed.) Civilisations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives (New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kivinen, M. (2002) Progress and Chaos: Russia as a Challenge for the Sociological Imagination (Helsinki, Kikimora Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Knoebl, W. (2010) ‘Path Dependency and Civilisational Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Theoretical Tasks’, European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. (1995) Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilisation (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. (2001) ‘Modern Times: The Soviet Union and the Interwar Conjecture’, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotkin, S. & Beissinger, M. (2014) ‘The Historical Legacies of Communism: An Empirical Agenda’, in Beissinger, M. & Kotkin, S. (eds) Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (2010) ‘Nation-States as Empires, Empires as Nation-States: Two Principles, One Practice?’ Theory and Society, 39, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laqueur, W. (2014) ‘After the Fall: Russia in Search of a New Ideology’, World Affairs, March–April.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. (2004) ‘The Two Faces of Contemporary Eurasianism: An Imperial Version of Russian Nationalism’, Nationalities Papers, 32, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. (2008) Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of an Empire (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. (2013) ‘Conservatism as the Kremlin’s New Toolkit: An Ideology at the Lowest Cost’, Russian Analytical Digest, 138.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. (2014) ‘Russian Nationalism and Ukraine’, Current History: A Journal of Contemporary World Affairs, 113, October.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, D. (2002) Empire: The Russian Empire and its Rivals (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. (1981) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. (1994) ‘The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited’, American Sociological Review, 59, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarkin, A. (2014) ‘Patriarkh Kirill i “postmaidannaya” Ukraina’, Pro et Contra, May–August.
   Google Scholar
• Malinova, O. (2008) ‘Tema imperii v sovremennykh rossiiskikh politicheskikh diskursakh’, in Miller, A. (ed.) Nasledie imperii i budushchee Rossii (Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2001) The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939 (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Maslovskiy, M. (2013) ‘Social and Cultural Obstacles to Russian Modernisation’, Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslovskiy, M. & Shangin, N. (2014) ‘Orthodox Religion and Politics in Post-Soviet Russia’, in Arnason, J. P. & Karolewski, I. P. (eds) Religion and Politics: European and Global Perspectives (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (2008) ‘Istoriya imperii i politika pamyati’, in Miller, A. (ed.) Nasledie imperii i budushchee Rossii (Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie).
   Google Scholar
• Mitrokhin, N. (2006) Russkaya pravoslavnaya tserkov’: sovremennoe sostoyanie i aktual’nye problemy (Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie).
   Google Scholar
• Motyl, A. (2010) ‘Russia’s Systemic Transformation since Perestroika: From Totalitarianism to Authoritarianism to Democracy to Fascism?’, The Harriman Review, 17, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, E. (2007) ‘Imperial Nationalism in Russia’, Russian Analytical Digest, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, E. & Verkhovskii, A. (2010) ‘Tsivilizatsionnyi natsionalizm: rossiiskaya versiya “osobogo puti”’, in Pain, E. (ed.) Ideologiya osobogo puti v Rossii i Germanii: istoki, soderzhanie, posledstviya (Moscow, Tri kvadrata).
   Google Scholar
• Rodkiewicz, W. & Rogoza, J. (2015) ‘Potemkin Conservatism: An Ideological Tool of the Kremlin’, Russian Analytical Digest, 171.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2008) ‘Two Camps? The Struggle to Understand Contemporary Russia’, Comparative Politics, 40, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2011) ‘The Future of Russian Democracy: Review Article’, Government and Opposition, 46, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2012) ‘Modernisation, Neo-Modernisation and Comparative Democratisation in Russia’, East European Politics, 28, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2013) ‘The Soviet Collapse: Contradictions and Neo-Modernisation’, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. (2007) ‘Post-Communist Russia: A Historic Opportunity Missed’, International Affairs, 83, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. (2015) ‘Forward to the Past in Russia’, Journal of Democracy, 26, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert, J. (2014) ‘The Return of Ideology—Russia’s New Sense of Mission’, Russian Analytical Digest, 148.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. (2010) ‘Political Sociology: Between Civilisations and Modernities: A Multiple Modernities Perspective’, European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. (2011) ‘World History, Civilisational Analysis and Historical Sociology: Interpretations of Non-Western Civilisations in the Work of Johann Arnason’, European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, C. & Killingsworth, M. (2011) ‘Stalin the Charismatic Leader? Explaining the “Cult of Personality” as a Legitimation Technique’, Politics Religion and Ideology, 12, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2012) Post-imperium: evraziiskaya istoriya (Moscow, ROSSPEN).
   Google Scholar
• Van Herpen, M. (2014) Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism (Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovskii, A. (2012) ‘Natsionalizm rukovodstva Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi v pervom desyatiletii 20 veka’, in Malashenko, A. & Filatov, S. (eds) Pravoslavnaya tserkov’ pri novom partiarkhe (Moscow, ROSSPEN).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (1994) A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (2008) Modernity as Experience and Interpretation. A New Sociology of Modernity (Cambridge, Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (2010) ‘Multiple Trajectories of Modernity: Why Social Theory Needs Historical Sociology’, Thesis Eleven, 100.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar