Forms of Communication between Large-scale Farms and Local Administrative Authorities in Russian Villages: About Benefactors and Sponsors

References

• Altrichter, H. (1984) Die Bauern von Tver: Vom Leben auf dem russischen Dorfe zwischen Revolution und Kollektivierung (Munich, Oldenbourg).
   Google Scholar
• Amelina, M. (2000) ‘Why Russian Peasants Remain in Collective Farms: A Household Perspective on Agricultural Restructuring’, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 41, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Amelina, M. (2001) False Transformations. From Stalin’s Peasants to Yeltsin’s Collective Farmers, unpublished PhD thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H. (1997) ‘Voucher Privatisation in Russia: Structural Consequences and Mass Response in the Second Period of Reform’, Europe-Asia Studies, 49, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baecker, D. (1998) ‘Organisation und Gedächtnis in der Tranformationsgesellschaft’, in Baecker, D. (ed.) Poker im Osten: Probleme der Transformationsgesellschaft (Berlin, Merve).
   Google Scholar
• Baecker, D. (1999) Organisation als System (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Baecker, D. (2007) Form und Formen der Kommunikation (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. (1998) ‘What’s the Difference? Industrial Privatisation and Agricultural Land Reform in Russia, 1990–1996’, Europe-Asia Studies, 50, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belaya, V. & Hanf, J. H. (2010) ‘Foreign Direct Investment as an Agent of Change in Russian Agrifood Business—Consequences of the Export of Chain Management Concepts by Foreign Investors’, Post-Communist Economies, 22, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2008) Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in Qualitative Methoden (Opladen, Verlag Barbara Budrich).
   Google Scholar
• Bonazzi, G. (2008) Geschichte des organisatorischen Denkens (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2011) ‘Die Ökonomie der symbolischen Güter’, in Bourdieu, P. (ed.) Kunst und Kultur. Kunst und künstlerisches Feld. Schriften zur Kultursoziologie 4 (Konstanz, UVK).
   Google Scholar
• Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1993) ‘Privatizing Russia’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Fiscal Policy (2008) Analytical Work on Indicators of Effectiveness of Local Governments in the Context of Decentralization Reform in Russia (Moscow, Center for Fiscal Policy), available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/Resources/244362-1193949504055/4348035-1352736698664/INDICATORS_EFFECTIVENESS_LOCAL_GOVERNMENTS_DECENTRALIZATION_REFORM.pdf, accessed 15 August 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1994) Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, MA & London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davydova, I. & Franks, J. R. (2006) ‘Responses to Agrarian Reforms in Russia: Evidence from Novosibirsk Oblast’’, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, J. & Thielmann, T. (eds) (2008) Spatial Turn. Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften (Bielefeld, Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Fitch Ratings (2006) Reform of Local Self-Governance in Russia, Russian Federation Special Report (New York, NY, Fitch Ratings).
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, NY, Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. (2002) ‘The Politics of Local Government in Russia: The Neglected Side of the Story’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. (2007) ‘Von der lokalen Selbstverwaltung zur “Machtvertikale”’, Russlandanalysen, 135.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. (2009) ‘Leviathan’s Return. The Policy of Recentralization in Contemporary Russia’, in Ross, C. & Campbell, A. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Georgieva, K. (2007) ‘Foreword’, in World Bank (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Hard, G. (2008) ‘Der Spatial Turn, von der Geographie her beobachtet’, in Döring, J. & Thielmann, T. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Hayoz, N. (1997) L’étreinte soviétique. Aspects sociologiques de l'effondrement programmé de l’URSS (Genf, Droz).
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, B. (2006) ‘Spielräume der Weltgesellschaft: Formale Strukturen und Zonen der Informalität’, in Schwinn, T. (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C. (1998) Marx Went Away—But Karl Stayed Behind (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kourliandskaja, G., Nikolayenko, Y. & Golovanova, N. (2001) ‘Local Government in the Russian Federation’, in Popa, V. & Muntaenu, I. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. & Küppers, G. (eds) Emergenz: Die Entstehung von Ordnung, Organisation und Bedeutung (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Kühl, S. (2007) ‘Formalität, Informalität und Illegalität in der Organisationsberatung. Systemtheoretische Analyse eines Beratungsprozesses’, Soziale Welt, 58, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kühl, S. (2011) Organisationen. Eine sehr kurze Einführung (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. (2007) ‘Observing Communication: Niklas Luhmann and the Problem of Ethnography’, Soziale Systeme, 13, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. & Brosziewski, A. (2007) ‘Participant Observation and Systems Theory: Theorizing the Ground’, Soziale Welt, 58, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. & Brosziewski, A. (2009) Observing Society: Meaning, Communication, and Social Systems (Amherst, NY, Cambria Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, Z. (2002) ‘The Impact of Land Reform on the Rural Population’, in O’Brien, D. J. & Wegren, S. K. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, P. (2008) Der Kolchoz-Archipel im Privatisierungsprozess: Wege und Umwege der russischen Landwirtschaft in die globale Marktwirtschaft (Bielefeld, Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, P. & Moser, E. (2009) ‘(De-)Centralizing Rural Russia: Local Self-Governance and the “Power Vertical”’, Geographische Rundschau International Edition, 5, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, P. & Vorbrugg, A. (2011) ‘Die russische Landwirtschaft im Privatisierungsprozess: Vom Kolchos- zum Investorenarchipel?’, Russlandanalysen, 229.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, P. & Vorbrugg, A. (2012) ‘Wiederkehr der Landfrage. Großinvestitionen in Russlands Landwirtschaft’, Osteuropa, 62, 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1964) Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation (Berlin, Duncker & Humblot).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995a) Die Kunst der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995b) Social Systems (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2009a) ‘Organisationen im Wirtschaftssystem’, in Luhmann, N. (ed.) (2009b).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (ed.) (2009b) Soziologische Aufklärung 3. Soziales System, Gesellschaft, Organisation (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2009c) ‘Organisation und Entscheidung’, in Luhmann, N. (ed.) (2009b).
   Google Scholar
• Moser, E. (2015) Postsowjetische Transformationen in der Weltgesellschaft. Politische Dezentralisierung und wirtschaftliche Differenzierung im ländlichen Russland (Bielefeld, Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Moser, E. (2016) The Logic of the Socialist Organisational Society: Political Control, the Soviet Village, and World Society, FIW-Working Paper No. 4 (Bonn, University of Bonn), available at: https://www.fiw.uni-bonn.de/publikationen/FIWWorkingPaper/fiw-working-paper-no.-4, accessed 15 August 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nikulin, A. (2005) ‘Noveishaya gigantomaniya’, Politicheskii Zhurnal, 63, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Nikulin, A. (2010) ‘Oligarkhoz kak preemnik postkolkhoza’, Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya, 11, 1.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. J. & Wegren, S. K. (eds) (2002) Rural Reform in Post-Soviet Russia (Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2011) Ten Years of Water Sector Reform in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, OECD Studies on Water (Paris, OECD Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (2003) The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, D. (1990) ‘Das Ende einer Organisationsgesellschaft. Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zum gesellschaftlichen Umbruch in der DDR’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, D. (1998) ‘Die konstitutive Widersprüchlichkeit der DDR. Oder: War die DDR–Gesellschaft homogen?’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft: Zeitschrift für historische Sozialwissenschaft, 24, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, V. & Muntaenu, I. (eds) (2001) Developing New Rules in the Old Environment: Local Governments in Eastern Europe, Caucasus, and Central Asia (Budapest, Local Government Initiative of the Open Society Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Prosterman, R. L., Mitchell, R. G. & Bradley, J. R. (1997) ‘Prospects for Family Farming in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 49, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. J. (2005) ‘Editor’s Introduction’, Statutes and Decisions: The Laws of the USSR and its Successor States, 41, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. (2006) ‘The Tortuous Path of Local Government Reform in the Russian Federation’, Local Government Studies, 32, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. (2009) Local Politics and Democratization in Russia (New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. & Campbell, A. (eds) (2009) Federalism and Local Politics in Russia (London & New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rossiiskaya Gazeta (2005) ‘The Place of Local Power. Interview with Dmitry Kozak’, Statutes and Decisions: The Laws of the USSR and its Successor States, 41, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ryl’ko, D. (2002) ‘New Operators in Russian Agriculture’, Russian Politics and Law, 40, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rylko, D. & Jolly, R. W. (2005) ‘Russia’s New Agricultural Operators: Their Emergence, Growth and Impact’, Comparative Economic Studies, 47, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Schinke, E. & Wädekin, K.-E. (1985) Die sowjetische Landwirtschaft an der Wende zum 12. Planjahrfünft: Produktion, Verbrauch, Außenwirtschaft (Cologne, Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien).
   Google Scholar
• Schwinn, T. (ed.) (2006) Die Vielfalt und Einheit der Moderne. Kultur- und strukturvergleichende Analysen (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
   Google Scholar
• Shipov, V. (2003) ‘Foreword: Perspectives on the Development of Local Self-Governance’, in World Bank (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2005) Inklusion und Exklusion. Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie (Bielefeld, Transcript).
   Google Scholar
• Tacke, V. (2001) ‘Funktionale Differenzierung als Schema der Beobachtung von Organisationen. Zum theoretischen Problem und empirischen Wert von Organisationstypologien’, in Tacke, V. (ed.) Organisation und gesellschaftliche Differenzierung (Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (1992) ‘Die vielköpfige Hydra: Netzwerke als kollektive Akteure höherer Ordnung’, in Krohn, W. & Küppers, G. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Ustinova, J. (2010) ‘Time is Ripe to Develop Agribusiness’, The St Petersburg Times, 14 September.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, V. J. (2009a) ‘Agrarian Reform in Russia. Myths and Reality’, Problems of Economic Transition, 51, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, V. J. (2009b) Tendentsii razvitiya i mekhanizmy vzaimodeistviya krupnogo i malogo biznesa v agropromyshlennom komplekse (Moscow, Rossiiskaya Akademiya Sel’skokhozyaistvennykh Nauk).
   Google Scholar
• Visser, O., Mamonova, N. & Spoor, M. (2012) ‘Oligarchs, Megafarms and Land Reserves: Understanding Land Grabbing in Russia’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, O. & Spoor, M. (2011) ‘Land Grabbing in Post-Soviet Eurasia: The World’s Largest Agricultural Land Reserves at Stake’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wädekin, K.-E. (1969) Führungskräfte im sowjetischen Dorf. Ihre politisch-soziale Situation und Funktion in der Ära Chruščev (Berlin, Duncker & Humblot).
   Google Scholar
• Wädekin, K.-E. (1973) The Private Sector in Soviet Agriculture (Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wandel, J. (2011) ‘Business Groups and Competition in Post-Soviet Transition Economies: The Case of Russian “Agroholdings”’, The Review of Austrian Economics, 24, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Wegren, S. K. (2009a) ‘Das Lebensmittelproblem der russischen Landwirtschaft’, Russlandanalysen, 178.
   Google Scholar
• Wegren, S. K. (2009b) Land Reform in Russia. Institutional Design and Behavioural Responses (New Haven, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wegren, S. K. (2011) ‘Investment Trends in Russian Agriculture’, Russian Analytical Digest, 99.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, A. (1982) Verfahren der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Überblick und Alternativen (Frankfurt am Main & New York, NY, Campus).
   Google Scholar
• Wollmann, H. & Gritsenko, E. (2009) ‘Local Self-government in Russia. Between Decentralization and Recentralization’, in Ross, C. & Campbell, A. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (1992) Food and Agricultural Policy Reforms in the Former USSR: An Agenda for the Transition, Studies in Economies in Transformation 1 (Washington, DC, The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (ed.) (2007) Local Governance and Civic Engagement in Rural Russia: A World Bank Project (Moscow, The World Bank and CAF Russia).
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. F. & Wilson, G. N. (2007) ‘The View from Below: Local Government and Putin's Reforms’, Europe-Asia Studies, 59, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar